A senior official at Nvidia has said that they're confident GeForce products based on Fermi will ship this year.
A senior official inside Nvidia has said that they're "confident" that the high-end GF100 Fermi-based graphics cards will be released this year.
Nvidia's top executives have tried to remain tight-lipped about its release plans for its next-generation GeForce products, refusing to even talk about the graphics capabilities of the new Fermi chip in any great detail.
The execs have continually stated that the first cards will launch "on Tuesday", but weren't even ready to commit to a Q4 2009 or Q1 2010 launch officially. This is because the GPU is still in the bring up phase, which is where the engineering team checks for bugs and begins the process of productisation, which involves working out potential clock speeds, writing and optimising drivers and more.
It's good to hear some positive news about Fermi after
the visual stunts on stage during the opening keynote.
There's no word on pricing or specific availability dates, but we'll keep digging for more. I've got quite a lot of information to decipher and sift through after many hours of probing Nvidia execs for more intricate Fermi architectural details. We'll be publishing a more detailed look at the new architecture (complete with some educated speculation on the graphics architecture based on the hints I've had this week) on
bit-tech very soon.
Discuss
in the forums.
Such can be done cheaper, more efficiently and simpler with ATI approach.
Are we to expect Fermi based motherboards,without x86 processors?
They aren't going to sell that many at £800 each...
Not to say I won't be happy if they do get them out, but I smell paper launch with possibly a few cards going to review sites, then no real availability for end-users until late January/February next year.
The 285's idle board power is the same as the 5870's, so they're pretty efficient at idle (i.e. most of the time). See here: http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2009/09/30/ati-radeon-hd-5870-architecture-analysis/17
who cares about idle, its not to hard to make something use less power when not under load, its load that Im more concerned about which causes the need for higher wattage power supplies, thats what really counts on my books, dont get me wrong idle is important too but its the overall size of the psu needed at load that Im more concerned about.
Which bye the way the 285 has a horrible load compared to the 5870
ur point? Im sure under furmark it would push a card past its designed operating spec/normal load conditions, regardless even still it draws less then the 285, so what did the 285 draw at that particular scene in Vantage?
By the way, more often than not the card is idle, you don't spend every living moment gaming you know.