bit-gamer.net

Australian attorney blocks new rating system

Australian attorney blocks new rating system

The debate about Australia's rating systems has been reawakened by Left 4 Dead 2 being refused classification.

The most adult rating that the Australian government can give out is a MA15+ rating, meaning that if a game or movie is considered unsuitable for 15 year olds then it is often refused classification and effectively banned. This happened to Left 4 Dead 2 recently, sparking a nationwide debate about whether the rating system in Oz should be changed.

Apparently though, the South Australian attorney-general, Michael Atkinson, is very much opposed to the introduction of an R18+ certificate that would be used for more gory and adult content, mainly because he doesn't like the interactive nature of violent games.

"People are participating and 'acting-out' violence and criminal behaviour when they are playing a video game," he explained in a comment to News.au.

"[The current rating system] certainly does restrict choice to a small degree, but that is the price of keeping this material from children and vulnerable adults. In my view, the small sacrifice is worth it," he added later.

According to reports Michael Atkinson is one of the only voices within the government opposing the idea of a new rating system for the Australian Office of Film and Literature and his sole vote is holding everything up. Atkinson was previously also in the news for trying to censor a public survey that would have been used to guide the OFLC on the issue - which, as Joystiq points out, means he tried to censor a survey about censorship and prevent the government from polling the populace. Crazy.

While we can certainly understand Australian's hard line on violent media and it's efforts to protect children from certain things, if the ratings system is policed and maintained correctly then the games shouldn't affect children anyway? Introducing a new R18+ rating would theoretically only give consenting adults more choice and would still give the OFLC the option to refuse classification to objectionable and truly offensive media.

That's just our two cents though - let us know yours in the forums.

11 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
Gremlin 1st October 2009, 12:07 Quote
Over here for us to get the new rating system approved each state Attorney-General must agree, but he has been the one holding back the 18+ rating for a long time now every other minister would approve it

It's fair to say he is the most hated man in Australia by gamers
Cobalt 1st October 2009, 12:22 Quote
This is the problem with democracy. Someone will always get into power somehow and then not fulfil their obligations to the people that put them there.
Almightyrastus 1st October 2009, 13:18 Quote
Personal opinions, like religion should have no place in politics
ChaosDefinesOrder 1st October 2009, 13:59 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Article
he tried to censor a survey about censorship and prevent the government from polling the populace

Meaning "No, don't listen to your voters, listen to ME - I'M RIGHT, NOT THE GENERAL POPULATION!"

people like that (as in Jack Thompson for example) should not be in politics!
leexgx 1st October 2009, 14:04 Quote
why cant the public just vote him out, one man should not be able to stop an vote as well, as its making voting for options pointless with him may had just give it to him and he say yes or no
pizan 1st October 2009, 14:11 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Article
he tried to censor a survey about censorship and prevent the government from polling the populace

Meaning "No, don't listen to your voters, listen to ME - I'M RIGHT, NOT THE GENERAL POPULATION!"

people like that (as in Jack Thompson for example) should be silenced!
airchie 1st October 2009, 14:24 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by the tard
People are participating and 'acting-out' violence and criminal behaviour when they are playing a video game
Not quite, should read "People are controlling digital models of fictional people who are participating and 'acting-out' violence and criminal behaviour in a virtual and consequence-free environment when they are playing a video game."
Normal, well-adjusted people can differentiate from wasting hundreds of zombies in all kinds of interesting ways within a game and going out in public with weapons and the intention to kill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Tard
The current rating system certainly does restrict choice to a small degree, but that is the price of keeping this material from children and vulnerable adults. In my view, the small sacrifice is worth it.
The point is, things shouldn't be (effectively) banned when they're only 'bad' for a certain minority of the populace. Alcohol, tobacco etc have nothing good about them other than the enjoyment they bring to some but plenty of negatives yet they're still allowed but controlled. Games should, at least, be treated the same since they're not linked with lung cancer etc and there's no conclusive proof that they do actually affect children negatively.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Article
which, as Joystiq points out, means he tried to censor a survey about censorship and prevent the government from polling the populace.
The word Zealot springs to mind... :(
Adnoctum 1st October 2009, 16:00 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by leexgx
why cant the public just vote him out, one man should not be able to stop an vote as well, as its making voting for options pointless with him may had just give it to him and he say yes or no

I hear people whinging about "Nu-Labour" and whatnot all the time. Why don't you vote them out? Sadly, in a democracy, you get asshats voted in by other asshats.

@ All.
We've already had this conversation with the banning of Fallout 3 in AU.
See here about situation in AU and why it is difficult changing game classification laws.
http://forums.bit-tech.net/showpost.php?p=1773756&postcount=35
http://forums.bit-tech.net/showpost.php?p=1776932&postcount=42
DarthDVD_AU 1st October 2009, 18:46 Quote
G'Day,
ummmmm... this isnt quite right....

Quote:

The most adult rating that the Australian government can give out is a MA15+ rating, meaning that if a game or movie is considered unsuitable for 15 year olds then it is often refused classification and effectively banned. This happened to Left 4 Dead 2 recently, sparking a nationwide debate about whether the rating system in Oz should be changed.

UnQuote:

We have: E, G, PG, M, MA+15, 18+, and XXX* ratings in australia,,,,, for TV, Films and other media, the problem is their isnt for games..
G, PG, M, MA15+ and thats it... for games

So you can watch the most violent Zombie Horror movie (with chainsaws) but you cant play a game that has the same level of violence as it....

That isnt realy a "fair go" now is it? and we Aussie's are all about a "fair go".
Nor is it consistent. Hell Doom1/2/3 ("oh lookit it has chainsaws and zombies and demons") is legal and L4D:1 got rated MA15+, L4D:2 may up the Gore and violence a little bit, but not enough to Jack it all the way up to 18+

Oh and W.O.W. maybe consided a illegal game (its not rated), publishers say there is a legal loophole saying its a online only game (true but its sold at retail).

Oh wait... that sounds like L4d:2 so maybe its legal if i purchase from steam?

Hey and if they want to pull the "protect the children" line, Inact laws to make it illegal to sell 18+/violent/adult games to persons under 18 (oh wait.... they have for other media).

What ever happend to the locked topshelf of your room, or password protected Personal computers... or ratings lockouts on consoles like the xbox360, PS3, etc its not hard to protect children form "unwanted materal". its just hard to get the polly's to understand technology.

Dont want your kids to view a violent movie or play a violent game.. dont buy it or lock it away.

Its only difficult because 1 Attorney-General is playing the "church card"
1 Attorney-General saying no... and 7 others saying yes... that dont sound very democratic does it? :?

Its sounds easier to change the Australian Constitution by Referendum. :(:(

and I cant vote him out... I'm in the wrong state.
And my Attorney-General has no problem with it ;)
But he is still labour :(:(

*In the Northern Territory & Australian Capital Territory it is legal to purchase "xxx Adult media(no games)"
Star*Dagger 2nd October 2009, 02:33 Quote
"and vulnerable adults", he calls them that, I call them girlfriends!

LOL. Morons telling other people how to live their lives, get a grip.

S*D
airchie 2nd October 2009, 09:40 Quote
I think a problem we're facing is that the older generation, the one controlling laws etc now, never had computer games as kids and they see them strictly as entertainment for children.
They don't seem to understand that the first generation of gamers like myself are now all grown up and still enjoy games as a form of entertainment, just like a movie or book.

I think with time that the laws will be changed, hopefully before I move to Oz...
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...