Diablo 3 may have initially seemed unlikey for consoles, but Blizzard haven't yet ruled the idea out.
Those of you wanting to play Blizzard's upcoming
Diablo 3 on a console may be pleased to hear that Blizzard could be actively pursuing the idea instead of just leaving it as "
theoretically possible", which is how the company described the idea last year.
In fact, according to Blizzard's Paul Sams, Blizzard isn't just hypothetically interested in bringing the dungeon romp to consoles and has actually entered into discussions with the first-party console makers. That's according to GameTrailers TV presenter Geoff Keighley, who uncovered the news recently.
"
Paul Sams of Blizzard says they haven't ruled out Diablo III for consoles, and are currently talking to the first parties,"
tweeted Keighley.
The news of a possible console version comes shortly after Blizzcon and GamesCom 2009, where Blizzard unveiled a new Monk character for
Diablo 3 and confirmed a number of new details for the game, including new efforts to block cheat and item duplication hacks, as well as a system to stop loot stealing in multiplayer games.
All of this was just a little bit over-shadowed by the announcement of a new
World of WarCraft expansion though, dubbed
Cataclysm and the fact that Bruce Campbell is being teased for the role of Leeroy Jenkins in the upcoming
World of WarCraft movie that'll be directed by Sam Raimi.
Which platform would you prefer to play
Diablo 3 on? Let us know your thoughts in
the forums.
due to mods
unless ms and sony allow them to run, Most of the mod people will still buy the pc version only. And from whats been said in hte past sony and ms dont want code that they didnt evaluate running on there consoles.
EDIT: Just a thought, but will the release day be pushed back abit further if this console deal goes though; due to devs being pulled away from coding the PC version?
Would be good if they could also integrate PC/Xbox cross-platform multiplayer
OH GOD NO! NO! NO! **** NO!
If this console bullshittery ends up delaying the game even more, and if they even so much as hint at thinking about crossplay, I'll go Postal in their offices myself.
If they do this - don't even start porting until the PC version is already on shelves. Better yet, outsource it like Valve did L4D for POS3 and then forget about it. The Blizzard team is needed for patches and awesome expansions.
I also welcome the Grand Unified Battlenet, so that console clowns can realize that their PC masters are better at this and any other game.
In a serious note, if they do, for the love of god, keep up with the patching.
I blame Microsoft and it's Crapbox 360.
I can Only hope i am wrong...
Diablo for the PS2 was quite a lot of fun to be honest but "walking" with the cursor keys or the stick will suck if they do it again.
It was for PS1
No game controller will substitute for a fully functioning mouse and a keyboard of hotkeys.
for the record, i'll still be buying it for pc, but i'm not bothered in the slightest it might be coming to consoles too -- i'm sure it'd only be those ones that would be "watered down" to become playable on a console. i'm quite pleased it's coming out on console too, if only to see peoples reactions over it ;)
+1
I'd like to see them shaft the consoles for at least a year (peferably 3) after the official PC release. . . . kinda like what the console makers do to the PC. . . .
I so wish they would have finished Starcraft Ghost and just done it on the PC as a shooter or something, I thought it looked like it was going to be a lot of fun. *sad*
I'm so sick of every game coming out going onto every sodding console going.
"Batman Asylum, out now for PS3, 360, Wii, DS, Gamboy, neogeo, iphone etc etc"
...besides think of the packaging...a big green/yellow 360 symbol on the front of the Diablo3 case will make it look like a cheap whore in make-up.