Sixteen Interior Ministers in Germany have asked the Bundestag to ban the production and sale of violent games.
In response to a recent school shooting in Winnenden, Germany sixteen Interior Ministers have asked the Bundestag to put a ban on violent videogames within Germany - one which would totally prevent the distribution
and development of violent games within German borders.
GamesPolitics reports that the ministers are hoping to get the ban fully enforced before the next German elections, which take place on September 27th.
If the proposal is accepted then any developers making violent games within Germany would be forced to either relocate entirely or to outsource all development to other countries - the biggest of the potentially affected developers being Crytek, who only just announced a new game,
Crysis 2. Oh dear.
While a proposal of this type might not gain much of a following in most countries, it's worth remembering that the German rating system is already pretty strict with violent videogames - with the German ratings body going so far as to require alterations to the cover art for
Left 4 Dead.
The proposal is also gaining a lot of attention as it comes in the wake of a school shooting in which sixteen people were killed, with the killer being revealed as a
Far Cry 2 and
Counter-Strike fan - though our personal feeling is that, if a widely-played computer game was enough to make you go on a killing spree, then it's likely there was a deeper problem to begin with.
What are your opinions on violent computer games and censorship? Let us know your thoughts in
the forums.
62 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyOn the other hand here's something I don't get: If a game is rated 18+ because it has sexual content, the parents will be all like "ZOMG I won't buy it for my kid". However, if it is a violent game with the same rating, they won't even bother, until something bad (and probably unrelated) happens. When it does, no one questions home education, only the game. I mean, how many people have played the game and haven't gone berserk?
Just baffling. :|
Nice one!
Perfect post. :D
*Added to sear's reputation. May the relix be with you.*
Obviusly there were even deeper reasons to do something like that, not videogames, Germany already has Violence in-game rules that are pretty hard. wich sucks big time for us the non psychopats :P(since it doesnt help in anything).
BTW, watch this video, its the future of video games in germany :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB6fq9Aadwk
No wonder the world's going to **** tbh :(
We all know (including them) that games are not the cause but merely a trigger if anything at all. But, as mentioned before, it is way easier to blame something like games or movies than to actually spend money on something so "useless" as schooling for parents of kids who show aggressive behaviour or who live in brutal environments.
And there's something else I don't understand:
How has that ANYTHING to do with Nazi Germany or the Holocaust?! I was born in 84, 39 years after the war and I still hear people ranting about "the Germans" being Nazis and what we did. ****ing hell, yes, it was bad! Most likely the worst thing anybody ever did since the settlers in America had their own genocide with the natives.
But please stop these amazingly stupid comments! The kids born today are 4th or 5th generation after the war! My father was born in 46, my mother in 52. What do I or my generation have to do with these Nazi pigs?
Sorry for the rant but it just makes me angry...
+1
Bringing something like the holocaust as a politicians reason for their decision (Even if it a incredibly mis-informed one) isn't appropriate.
@perplekks45 I love and respect Germany, Germans and German culture and I meant no offence. I am sorry if it was taken like that. My vitriol is at the politicians not the German people who I have more respect for than the British, thats for sure. The politicians in Germany and the UK for that matter need to stop with this blaming of video games. It is a cheap shot and I am sure Germany would rather have the taxes on games than not? I reckon Gordon Brown will try to follow suit.. that is if he still has a job by the end of the week ;)
did this guy never do anything else in his life .if somebody is a boxer or mma fighter and he shoots a guy is it because of his hobby
i think not its just away to blame something or somebody for someone else`s problems .there must be apart of them that wants to kill and nothing to do with his hobby (ie gaming)
i game and i`m not looking to shoot anybody does that make me wrong (i hope not)
Surely there are a couple more people playing Far Cry and CS in a country of some 80 M people, how come there isn't a school shooting every day? Because the games don't make people go nuts!
Now if only the politicians didn't have their heads too high up their arses to see the fact. Too much asked, I'm afraid.
Ridiculous!
If they go too far with these bans, then who will join their army and protect their country and the freedom they live in, if their population become over sensitised to any violence? Their army will become softer than the futuristic film Demolition Man. That's IF it will have an effect on the population and people's mentallity. :)
On a serious note, who are they trying to kid? Are they really saying that the video game made the person commit the crime? Don't they think the crime would have been commited regardless. If a natural born psychopath is found with a game on his PC, such as, Left 4 Dead, you can easily argue that the game vented his frustration on a daily basis and saved lives. What these politicians should do is focus on the real job of dealing with certain persons mental or social problems etc instead of looking for scapegoats and fooling the public to oversimplistic ways of analysing problems.
When the live action TV series of Batman and, later, Spiderman first ran on TV, people tried to ban them after certain 'copycats' decided to jump out of tall buildings, convinced they were said superheroes. Nobody in their RIGHT MIND would ban a TV show for this kind of reason. The route problem needs to be dealt with rather than trying to spoil the 'show' for the majority audience that know the consequences of putting on a cape and jumping out of a 12th floor building. What are they teaching people by banning the show? They would be teaching them that the show is the evil thing and that 'responsible' and intelligent humans should pass their responsibility for their own actions onto the makers of a TV show.
A video game is the same. You're unlikely to see a natural psychopath with 'My Little Pony' game insttalled on his PC. Instead he will have violent games. So will 'normal' people have violent games. Normal people don't walk outside and kill people because a videogame made them do it.
We all know that usually there are deeper psychological issues when something unfortunate like this occurs (mental illness, loneliness coupled with being bullied, horrid home life, etc/et all).
My question is-- what are the gun laws in Germany? How did the shooter obtain their weapon? Per chance the authorities should be pursuing that question?
It's pretty strict, The gunmans farther was a member of a gun club and therefore he had a pistol, unfortunately not properly secured. I don't know the specific weapon used, but I doubt it was bought for competition shooting as those mostly are a low calibre 22.
p.s there also trying to get rid of Paintball another supposedly violent game that were protesting for the same reason... it's just people link violence game to guns and crimes... if your trying to limit the violence restrict the gun laws....
I do, especially when Mario keeps falling into the hole in the same spot! Oh well, that's Mario Bros.. sorry, wrong game! :p
all the usual shooters yes, but then there are others that could be included as violent like, boxing games, ultimate fighter games, wresteling games, driving games like burnout (rewarded for causing huge accidents), even games like World of Warcraft can be viewed as violent and how exactly would they plan to ban that?
The banning of violent games could easily see 50% of games being taken of their shelfs, I cant see manufecturers being too happy about that.
I'm not sure it's something that will ever happen, it's just too absurd, even for politicians
wolfenstein, medal of honor, call of duty, etc...
no more leipzig games convention
games dont kill people, guns do
btw they should also ban violent MOVIES, have they ever seen a horror movie?
No, people kill people - the gun is a tool that can be used or abused, like any other tool. A person with violent tendencies does not need a gun to kill someone - a pipe, a baseball bat, a piece of wood or even your fists are all capable of killing someone. If you ban firearms, then people who are inclined to kill will find a different way of doing it, or just obtain firearms illegally.
Don't blame the tools, blame the people.
Edit: I'm not a particularly "pro-gun" person, either.
They should ban the bible ( one of the most senselessly violent books known to man )
Everything you've said is true... But give a murderer a more effective tool and he/she becomes a more effective murderer... Guns enable the weak (mentally or physically) to dominate the strong.
I didn't mean to offend anyone, I just felt like I had to say something.
THEREFORE take the guns and bullets away and control the use of Knives. (mobile metal detector stations all over the place) or even......
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8089959.stm
* Stop the gun and bullet being in public places and you stop violent gun crime......
* Remove the confidence that walking around the streets with a knife is unlikely to be detected and you also reduce the potential for knife crime...
* Remove the use of glass bottles and glasses in all pubs with plastic bottles and drink glasses and guess what you stop a further 50 people loosing and eye, being scarred for life or killing someone...
* Control the (abuse) of alcohol in public places and you aslo remove the main casue of violance.
* Allow a drug addict to be prescribed and consulted by a Dr and remove the Drug economy (instead of killing loads of Afgans).
* Because the Police are "thick" when it comes to Cyber traffic of guns, bullets and knives - fine eBay and the like "BiG STYLE" for selling sh1t and turning a blind eye....
One idea I have is give people who are searched a £5 voucher to spend on a charity.....!
WHY is the situation like it is.....?
1) Money (people who make and sell guns, knives, alcohol and drugs)
2) Incompetent politicians and the PC brigade (searching people is not nice - Bollocks I say)
FREEDOM............
QFT.
Besides, you can kill someone with a spoon if you want to, so should we not be banning spoons?:D
Indeed, but making firearms illegal doesn't mean that no one can access them. All it does is force firearms solely into the hands of criminals. I'm not naive enough to think that there will never be an illegal arms trade, but the hand gun ban in Britain hasn't stopped criminals from obtaining and using them anyway. In fact if anything it's glamorised the use of hand guns, so more people will want to try and get hold of them.
Guns do make for more effective murderers, but the chances are they were always inclined to murder anyway.
Your keys might be next - you could probably kill someone with a car key, if used effectively (not sure if that's really the right term!).
So if 5 murders take place during a bad year, all making use of HDMI cables, would they ban HDMI cables?
Did the cable turn the attackers into murderers? Or did the 'murderers' make use of a HDMI cable?
Right? Right?! RIGHT?!?!?!? WHO THE FU*K SAYS I'M WRONG?!?!?! IT'S THESE GAMES THAT MAKE YOU A SOCIOPATH!!!! FU*KING KIDS ARE GETTING FU*KING AGGRESSIVE DUE TO THEM!!! WE SHOULD BAN ALL FU*KING GAMES TO SAVE OUR FU*KING CHILDREN!!!
Or maybe I should just try one of the games before I try banning something I don't even understand...
:(
And don't forget to ban tetris, someone might assume they can acquire building skills with it and try to build a house (that would end up collapsing just like the blocks fall down in tetris).:D
We should ban the kiddie gamers instead. Problem solved.
Oh wait, we did that already. :|
I've never got the concept behind banning M rated material to protect children who are not supposed to get hold of it anyway. Duh, it's called mature for a reason. Oh well, time to move on. Switzerland is supposed to be beautiful, or so I've heard.