BioShock copy protection fix released

"SecuROM fixed? Is safe to come out now? Kthnxbai!"

BioShock was a great game, but if there was one fly in the beautifully greasy ointment then it was the copy protection system, which used a system called SecuROM to limit the number of installs players could use.

SecuROM was a little flawed to say the least and we had to launch our own little investigation to find out exactly what was going on. We were even prepared to sacrifice a copy of the game in order to test the protection system by doing multiple install/uninstalls across multiple systems.

Now though, a fix has finally been released. Just as Ken Levine promised, a tool is now ready for download that will free up an 'install token' as long as the game has been installed legally.

Put simply, the BioShock Activation Revoke Tool will allow you to install and uninstall your game as many times as you want on a single system as long as there are no significant hardware changes. I know - it's hardly ideal, but at least it's there.

The tool can be downloaded from the official Cult of Rapture site and there's a full FAQ available too just in case you have any questions.

With that out of the way, it seems like now would be the ideal time to ask you how you feel about BioShock. It has been a while since release now, so has the appeal of the game gone the distance or did you quickly grow tired of Rapture? Drop your answers in the forums and discuss the matter at depth.
Quote cjoyce1980 15th October 2007, 10:00
I glad i got the 360 version, just plug and play! and I think the best single player campaign since the original Halo!
Quote Jinjue 15th October 2007, 10:04
Thats all well and good.

I wonder when they are gonna get their fingers out and fix the PROBLEMS that many many people are facing with the actual gameplay of Bioshock.

My problem is that the game crashes at the start of level 2 regardless of the many fixes i have been provided by the tech staff.

There are hundreds of cases like this and many more.

That is nearly 2 months now and for 30 quid...I have got 1 level. Really pathetic!

Andy (N.Ireland)
Quote quack 15th October 2007, 10:52
I managed to break the copy of Vista I had BioShock installed on, so I had to reinstall it, losing an BioShock activation in the process. Now I should be able to revoke that one, and be returned to 0. Yay.
Quote slugs 15th October 2007, 11:45
finished it playing on my xp machine. was going to play through on my vista machine. to see the "bad" endingand the difference directx10 made. But theres no suprises i got bored very quickly.
Quote AcidJiles 15th October 2007, 12:19
using securom is enough for me not to buy a game unless its one i must have
Quote slugs 15th October 2007, 12:22
kind of someone to change my post above. should people who cannot spell be banned from the forums. i draw the line at buying games with starforce protection. i waited until flatout2 was released with securarom
Quote Ghys 15th October 2007, 12:55
good news !
Quote [USRF]Obiwan 15th October 2007, 13:18
Too late, I played the whole game almost a month ago. Although I wished it would lasted more then the 6 evenings i played it. Unlike Jinjue i played without any error or other strange game bugs on a 8800gtx running on a 64bit vista.

Have you tried to reninstall it, or run it on a different system. Or do you have a very old system?
Quote Jordan Wise 15th October 2007, 13:33
6 evenings? Ha! i did it in one, but suffered at work the next day for doing so. Totally worth it!
Quote RTT 15th October 2007, 13:47
Quote:
Originally Posted by slugs
kind of someone to change my post above. should people who cannot spell be banned from the forums.

No one edited your post, it's just a joke - the forum software does it automatically :)
Quote Jinjue 15th October 2007, 13:55
Obiwan : i have tried EVERYTHING.........trust me.........my last bit of awesome advice was to wait for a patch.

And my machine while far from top spec is far from old (read as X2 3800, 2 Gig and 7900GTX)

I have to say that 2K support is really gash.

HOW LONG.............does a patch take?


Add to the fact i cant refund it becuase it is "opened"

Brilliant.

Andy
Quote wuyanxu 15th October 2007, 14:02
meh, i've already lost 2 of my installs due to Vista decided to go flop.

i really hate this, Steam is a better idea compared to this. (not saying playing single player requires online activation is good, hence HL2) but they should just stick to the old method, or at least do it right the first time round.
Quote fargo 15th October 2007, 14:03
I for one will not be buying any bioshock sequeal, 2k can stick securom where the sun doesn't shine
there are too many good games coming out to put up with that crap!!
Quote Tyinsar 15th October 2007, 15:12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Article
...will allow you to install and uninstall your game as many times as you want on a single system as long as there are no significant hardware changes. ...
Kinda useless "fix" if you ask me - one MB upgrade and ... Then again, if the game is as short as some people say, who cares to reinstall?
Quote Gunsmith 15th October 2007, 17:51
shame its not going to fix the dumbed down console feel of it, when will game companies learn that console and pc gamers are two different breeds and dont mix.

bit-tech is a pc based site so why is it when i see a gaming review i have to question what format its on?
Quote GoodBytes 15th October 2007, 18:04
I'm with AcidJiles,
I don't need rootkits!
Quote mclean007 15th October 2007, 18:07
Quote:
Originally Posted by slugs
should people who cannot spell be banned from the forums.
Now there's a thought... :D
Quote pendragon 15th October 2007, 18:26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyinsar
Kinda useless "fix" if you ask me - one MB upgrade and ... Then again, if the game is as short as some people say, who cares to reinstall?

meh, i've re-played games many many years later. On principle ,I feel that if you buy it, it should be install&hardware independant. At least this is better than nothing I guess? :|
Quote wuyanxu 15th October 2007, 19:34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunsmith

bit-tech is a pc based site so why is it when i see a gaming review i have to question what format its on?

i agree, what's Halo 3 doing on the games review section. take that linear, bog-standard, dumb console game off the PC based site!
Quote Kipman725 15th October 2007, 20:08
meh I just played a pirate version.. no copy protection at all. :)

I'm pretty sure a good deal of bit-tech readers did but just don't want to say it. I actualy woudl have bought the game once it had gone down in price a little as it looked quite interesting and I do frequantly buy games (when I have money)... this time no.

ALso the game was nowhere near the hype... the only thing that impresed me was the water and the sequance where you are forced to beat a man to death. Certanly not worthy of 90%+.
Quote quack 15th October 2007, 20:45
Quote:
Originally Posted by quack
I managed to break the copy of Vista I had BioShock installed on, so I had to reinstall it, losing an BioShock activation in the process. Now I should be able to revoke that one, and be returned to 0. Yay.
Doesn't quite work as I hoped. I think that particular activation is lost forever. Oh well.
Quote Jodiuh 15th October 2007, 22:42
sruprise

edit: hmmm...
Quote outlawaol 17th October 2007, 06:04
I personally despise the *activate to play* systems on all these games. If they were smart, they should have done it like BF2. You can install the game on any number of systems ect, but once you log in the net only that one key is valid at any given time while logged on.

To me thats intelligent setup. Not this BS setup. Since I've had the game Ive done a complete computer replacement, and before that I reinstalled the game several times on the old system because of issues. Hope this round works without non-sense (havnt installed yet).

Can any one say "CD/DVD drive redesign time"? Cause off the cuff I can think of about 20 ways to make a drive read the disc in a copyrighted manner, without internet connection. Kinda hard to hack/crack a drive that reads a blip/microchip on the CD/DVD that is embedded.
Quote GoodBytes 17th October 2007, 06:14
Quote:

Can any one say "CD/DVD drive redesign time"? Cause off the cuff I can think of about 20 ways to make a drive read the disc in a copyrighted manner, without internet connection. Kinda hard to hack/crack a drive that reads a blip/microchip on the CD/DVD that is embedded.

Isn't that DRM? Like on the blue-ray and HDDVD player and sound card and video card?
Quote outlawaol 17th October 2007, 06:27
^^ I have no clue actually. But why just one series of media? Just start with the new drives/media and have back support for old media. DRM at current (that Im aware of) is software based. What I am suggesting is a firmware drivin system using intergrated parts. Think of a clock and master gear, no master gear no working clock.

And on a side note, actually finding this tool on bioshocks website sucks.... I ended up searching for activation fixes and ended up relinking through here! >:|
Quote mclean007 17th October 2007, 10:27
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlawaol
^^ I have no clue actually. But why just one series of media? Just start with the new drives/media and have back support for old media. DRM at current (that Im aware of) is software based. What I am suggesting is a firmware drivin system using intergrated parts. Think of a clock and master gear, no master gear no working clock.

And on a side note, actually finding this tool on bioshocks website sucks.... I ended up searching for activation fixes and ended up relinking through here! >:|
So the new drive (let's call it N-ROM) will read DVD and CD but will only read N-ROM discs where the proper radio tag is present? I can see several ways around it straight away:

(1) crack the game and burn it to DVD/Blu-Ray/whatever
(2) crack the firmware so that it ignores the requirement for a tag in N-ROM discs
(3) build an N-ROM writer which can write data to N-ROM discs and write an appropriate radio tag as well

Lots of clever hardware manufacturers have tried and failed to implement bullet proof DRM, and the simple reason they fail is that DRM by its very nature is fundamentally flawed. In order for a consumer to legitimately use digital content, they have to be able to read the content. To do this, you have to give them either unencrypted content or encrypted content with the key and the decryption algorythm. With these three things you can create a perfect copy.

Now, with internet connected devices you can track who is using which copy where, and can revoke a copy which is being used in multiple places at the same time. You can also mandate online registration and provide the decryption key online only once the product is properly validated. This is about as good as it gets for now, and is reasonably successful (e.g. Windows Vista). However, there are ALWAYS vulnerabilities and given enough time and enough people with the desire to crack it, any DRM will eventually be broken, especially if it is to work 'offline'.
Quote Viscera 17th October 2007, 14:05
This doesn't solve the problem. If you are a steam user, then this process is bullshit.

read all about it here

http://digg.com/pc_games/Bioshock_on_Steam_Max_installs_and_no_way_to_unlock_it

Trust me, I had to whinge like crazy to have it fixed.
Quote Viscera 17th October 2007, 14:08
Sorry, Double post
Quote steveo_mcg 17th October 2007, 15:21
Meant to buy when this came out, but tbh it still doesn't solve my immediate gripe. Any way there are lots more games out now might get it when its cheap in the shops or on fleabay next summer, the inevitable games drought during the British monsoon season. So sorry 2k you've lost a full price sale, too little too late.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.