You won't need these - the EC is hoping to offer wireless broadband to all European citizens.
The EC has outlined its plans to bring wireless broadband to the entirety of Europe using the space cleared by the closure of the analogue TV service.
According to an article over on
V3.co.uk, the European Commission is looking to offer the radio frequency spectrum freed up by the closure of Europe's analogue TV service to "
innovative providers of technology services," which it hopes will help the European Union meet its target of offering broadband coverage to all citizens by 2013.
As well as offering high-speed Internet connectivity to all, the EC believes that use of the freed spectrum will generate between £18 billion and £45 billion for the European economy - figures that are certainly not to be sniffed at as many countries are still limping out of recession.
In order to fully free the important part of the spectrum - the range between 790MHz and 862MHz, which offers both improved penetration of buildings and excellent range when compared to higher wavelengths - the EU commissioner for information society and media Viviane Reding is encouraging all EU member nations to pick up the pace with the digital TV roll-out and complete the transition to digital TV by the start of 2012.
With the technology already in place to offer a stable 12Mb/s connection wirelessly - as Nokia has proven with its
Long Term Evolution project - re-use of the old TV spectrum in this manner could finally bring affordable broadband to those in rural areas not covered by cable or ADSL providers.
Do you believe that the EU's plan to offer wireless broadband to all is a great use of the analogue TV spectrum, or would you rather they simply increased the availability of ADSL? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
Was wondering that myself, would everyone need to have their own RF transmitter?
I think its a great idea - give it a go anyway.
Can't see upstreaming being any different then it is now..
I believe it works the same way data on a cell network works, just on a different spectrum. So yes you would need a radio for upsream.
It's all very well and groovy the EU coming up with these ideas but it's our pockest it eventually comes out of, so how much is it going to cost me?
It's only when you're allowed free reign across frequencies in the UK that you personally need to be a licensed operator.
I like the idea of re-using the analogue signal for this (or at least part of it) and LTE should make great use of it now and into the future, but I was still looking forward to having more HD channels over DVB-T2 in all fairness! There's always FreeSAT I suppose. :)
As for the rest of the world. ill stick with me sat internet for the time being, reliable and stable. I like the 3.5G dongle i have but it just cant compete when your stuck in the desert with no phone signal (which isnt THAT often to be honest these days).
I'd much rather they improved the hard-wired infrastructure to improve ADSL speeds.
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. This is just another step towards making the internet available to everyone, whether that is wirelessly or through the various wired alternatives. I certainly don't think Virgin media or other ISP are going to say "Well, nevermind our wired network which we spent billions developing. We'll let that rot and move to wireless." :-P . I think there will always be companies and individuals who prefer the greater speed and reliability achievable through wired networks. However, for your average citizen it makes it that much easier to start crossing the digital divide.
ed