SP1 is coming in late 2007..I mean early 2008. Hold on, it'll be out by the end of the year. Oops, sorry, now it's next year. Oh nevermind already, I give up.
Based on some leaked emails to testers, we reported last month that Service Pack 1 for Vista
would be out by the end of the year. Unfortunately, that one isn't coming true but it won't be long after it before it's released. Microsoft has given an official statement saying that it will be out in the
first quarter of 2008.
SP1 won't be bringing any new features to the flagship OS, but expect to see plenty of improvements to existing features and security.
"
I should start by saying that one thing people shouldn’t expect to see is new features, although some existing components and features will be enhanced." said Jon DeVaan, senior vice president of the Windows Core Operating System division. "
For example, we’ve added support in BitLocker Drive Encryption for encrypting multiple volumes on the PC, and have improved printer management by simplifying printing to a local printer from within a Terminal Server session. Service packs typically are not vehicles for new features, and the same will be true with Windows Vista SP1."
According to the SP1
white paper, the key features in the release will be quality improvements, improvements to the administration experience and support for emerging hardware and standards.
Beta versions of the Service Pack will be made available to more than 10,000 within the next couple of weeks so the rest of us can expect a torrent in the same time frame.
Have you been waiting on SP1 before you made the migration? Let us know over
in the forums or in the comment section below.
25 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyI lol'ed
Google Vista ram management and educate yourself ;)
Slagging vista off when equipped with he facts is ok, when you just blindly abuse it.. that is just wrong
For actual background processes it hogs up around 30-50%. Notice I used %, because this is virtually true no matter what amount of RAm you have. 4GB, 50%. 2GB, 50%. 1GB, 50%.
Also, it drops that usage faster than a green snake up a sugarcane when an app actually needs it.
hope SP1 fix the "start menu search 'word' can't launch Word 2007 issue".
Works fine for me, unless you're on about something other than pressing winkey > typing 'word' then hitting enter?
it has to be a shortcut. if you open word's property, it's not a shortcut, it's just says "target: Microsoft Office Professional 2007"
How much does it occupy? By design Vista is made to use your ram to give you a better user experience rather than just doing nothing with it.
Kimbie
Thanks for this information. CK.
Tim, it looks like you may need to retest to see if high end gaming improves
The more I use Vista the more I love it. Except for the RAM issue I honestly cannot find a problem (well a problem to me) with it. I don't consider games compatibility issues an OS thing it's more that the game company just needs to release a Vista-Compatability patch.
IDK maybe I'm just to lenient :P
RAM is there to be used!
But it upsets me :'(
It's a shame because Microsoft have forced people into this belief that lower memory usage is better.
so there's no problem with Vista's RAM managment, in fact, it's very good. the desktop still feels very fluent after a heavy gaming section. in XP SP2, you will feel sluggish after every gaming section.