Solar energy is the main power source behind Solar Host's servers.
Right now, going "green" is a major thing happening throughout the technology industries. From
low power HDDs,
bamboo monitors and
wooden cases all the way to
environmentally friendly laptops, it seems as if everyone out there is trying to be as environmentally friendly as possible. (Well, except for
these guys.)
Heck, here at bit-tech we try to leave as little of a carbon footprint as possible even when dealing with the latest in bleeding edge technology. When he is not busy keeping the site up and running, Rich Taylor (RTT) is kept locked in a gigantic hamster wheel where he has to constantly run to keep the lights from going out and Joe Martin has even admitted to just how environmentally friendly he is
over in the forums.
Normally we don't pimp many web services or the like, but when forum member
Mother-Gooser pointed us towards his mate's carbon-free web hosting, I couldn't pass up the opportunity to let all you out there know about it.
Solar Host is a web hosting service that runs completely off solar power and even its datacentre is certified energy efficient. Not just carbon deals and energy rebates efficient - we mean
totally solar. It even stores the juice in biodegradable batteries! And with prices ranging from £20 a year for an email only package to £95 a year for 2Gb of webspace, it's wallet-friendly too.
100 percent uptime and reliability are primary dedications for the company and its servers are powered by AMD Opterons; but other then that, we don't know many more details. Hopefully though, I'll soon have a chat with Tom Williamson, the owner and operator of Solar Host, and find out more about the hardware and power structure behind this carbon free web host.
Meanwhile, however, let us know if you'd be willing to migrate your site over to an eco-friendly web host in the comments below or
over in the forums.
Sam
I thought solar panels were so harmful to the environment during manufacture, you'd need to use them for longer than their servicable life to offset the damage caused by their production.
Maybe newer techniques have resolved this?
If their web servers can be as efficient as my laptop at idle (20-30 watts) and only peak at 90 watts, my guess for one server the solar demand would be 800 watts solar per server.... or $4000 USD and thats without the cost of tracking mounts, charge regulators, inverters or batteries! A 5KW bank of batteries (*fuzzy memory on this, correct me if I'm wrong!) will cost about $10,000 USD and to spare your batteries an early death you should only use the top 75% of their capacity. Sooooo to run a small server farm will probably cost in the range of $100,000 +
kudos to that company for taking on such a financial burden to go green!
I wonder if they use any wind power...? would depend on how much wind they get annualy.
Lukily where I live I get a decent amount of wind. For my repeater station I'm also going to buy a 400 watt wind turbine to offset those long nights and cloudy days in the winter.
"we are equipt with 60 days worth of battery backup - yes we can run in the night time and winter! We have a backup generator that runs on propane gas. Propane gas is cleaner burning than diesel, which is found at most other hosting companies. Propane does not emit large amounts of carbon dioxide and produces no sulfur dioxide or particulates which is the primary causes of the greenhouse effect and acid rain. In fact, propane also meets the standards set by the federal Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) for reducing acid rain and controlling air pollution in urban areas. The CAAA heralds propane as one of the solutions to a cleaner, healthier environment. And since propane vaporizes rapidly, it won't contaminate soil or groundwater. The generator is for emergency use only and is tested weekly."
"£95 a year for 2Gb of web space"
i know a host (that i usually use) that $6/mo ($60/year) for 200gb space, 2000gb bandwidth per month (inc unlimited email address and unlimited sql databases, users, etc etc)
Still if you want to do your bit for the environment, i guess if you want to pay the premium
http://blog.dreamhost.com/2007/04/20/were-green/
(I'm sorry, but I couldn't resist.)
I don't agree with the whole carbon credits thing.
It becomes an extra income source for some companies and lets other companies get away with not reducing pollution even one iota.
completemadness: Have you approached these limits on your account? Because they're over-selling. You get what you pay for and with webhosts that's exactly right.
*sigh* that figure may be 60hrs.. not 60 days.
but other people who use them definitely recommend them too, and IMO they are very good
Its pretty hard to upload 200GB of stuff and use 2000GB of bandwidth, Ive had about 50 SQL databases with them with no problems, and quite a few email accounts
They claim 99% up time, which is a little lower then "the best" (which usually quote 99.9%) but IMO still more then acceptable
Disclosure: I have a vested interest in Carbon trading being accepted, as I co-own Carbon360.
[/OT]
And it fact it must have, the price per tCO2 is now at its lowest ever at €0.08 when its high was €29.78!
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely support reductions, as much as possible, but it's very difficult for some companies to do so. Aluminium smelting for example produces huge amounts, and there's not much that can be done there.