Now, storing all of your important data won't use as much energy.
On Monday,
Western Digital introduced its new family of hard drives that will use up to 40 percent less energy then comparable products.
The new GreenPower line will ship in capacities available from 320GB up to 1TB with a desktop version of the Caviar scheduled for an August release. Enterprise and consumer electronic versions of GreenPower SATA drives are expected to ship later this quarter. Estimates from Western Digital show that the new line of drives could save £5 per drive, per year in electricity and help reduce CO2 emissions by up to 600 metric tons per 100,000 drives.
With some data centres having thousands of hard drives, potential savings could be up in the hundreds of thousands of pounds a year range if the entire centre ran GreenPower drives. Home users could shave a couple of pounds a month off their home energy bills by migrating over to the less power hungry drives.
The new technologies behind the power savings are
IntelliPower,
IntelliPark, and
IntelliSeek. These named features fine-tune the balance of spin speed, transfer rate and cache size, automatically unload the heads during idle to reduce the aerodynamic drag, and calculate the optimum seek speeds to help lower noise, vibration, and power usage.
With lower CO2 emissions due to less energy requirements, would you be willing to switch over to the new GreenPower drives to reduce your
carbon footprint? Discuss
in our forums.
If you want to use less power, get solid state!
But where does it get to the point where we're not allowed to fart without planting a tree?
Good luck getting big capacities then.. for the time being :D
You know it will come down in price, look how cheap USB/stick memory is.
True, speeds need to increase too though. Bit-tech's own review of that SSD drive the other day didn't impress me much.
Uh, well, unless i'm missing something, that's exactly what'll happen. Efficiency aside, it isn't like the PSU is constantly sucking 500W (or whatever) and burning off anything you aren't using in heat/noise etc.
More than happy to be corrected/proven wrong though :)
Moreover, people are forgetting another benefit (besides laptop applications) of a 40% drop in power requirements: a 40% drop in heat generated. Think about it.
FRAM memory chips have memory cells that contain a specific ferroelectric material such as a crystal of zirconium or titanium, or oxygen and lead. FRAM is much faster than Flash, and has a near-unlimited number of write-erase cycles. Unfortunately chips produced are still at the Mbit, rather than Gbit stage...
Now given my experience, where heat (and maybe a touch of noise) were the only complaints I had about the WD hdd, I'm not too surprised that they seem to have put some effort into getting the heat down :)
Compared to linear regulators, the switch-mode power supplies in computers do not have a linear relationship between power and efficiency. It looks something like this (image stolen from Coding Horror):
http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c3/hitman012/psu.png
You can see that at lower output levels the efficiency drops quite significantly, whereas the peak efficiency sits at around 50-60% of the rated output.
Nerd. :)
I agree with Jamie, its BS. If we focused on developing renewable sources of energy quicker we wouldn't be making a carbon footprint. If we had 10 trillion wind turbines and had 1000 times more power than we could ever need, wouldn't we all be leaving our computers and lights on constantly?
Electricity is not bad, the way we make it is. People need to keep that in mind to avoid marketing gimmicks.
The most important thing here is that these drives may go somewhere to reducing the time I spend screaming when reading my electricity bill every quarter. Although I don't deny the environment issue needs to be addressed - who can argue about reduced energy bills? Mass storage afterall doesn't need to be placed in a Raptor RAID array.