bit-tech.net

AMD announces first Richland APU parts

AMD announces first Richland APU parts

AMD's new Richland APUs come with yet another rebranding, with the top-end A10 chips getting the "Elite Quad Core" moniker.

AMD has formally announced its Richland accelerator processing units (APUs,) promising a jump in performance across the A10, A8, A6 and A4 families when they launch later this month - but, thus far, is only talking about the laptop parts.

Originally teased at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) earlier this year, the Richland APUs are claimed to offer a 20 to 40 per cent boost in performance over current-generation APU products, and will be appearing this year on both desktops and laptops. For now, however, AMD is only detailing the laptop parts, which use the company's latest FS1r2 socket type for embedded and laptop designs.

Based on the Richland APU design, the new products see a single part introduced at all four levels: An A10-5750M, an A8-5550M, an A6-5350M and an A4-5150M. Each comes with a 35W thermal design profile, matching that of previous-generation Trinity-based designs, and include a boost in clock speed over their existing counterparts - likely a large portion of the claimed 20 to 40 per cent performance boost AMD was showing off at CES.

The top-end chip, the A10-5750M, includes an integral AMD Radeon HD 8650G graphics processor with 384 stream processing cores running at 533MHz and boosting to 720MHz, while the four Richland general-purpose cores run at 2.5GHz and hit 3.5GHz in Turbo Core conditions. 4MB of L2 cache is included, split as is usual into two blocks of 2MB for the paired cores, while support for DDR3-1866 memory is included along with DDR3L-1600 and DDR3U-1333 support for lower-power designs.

The A8-5550M, meanwhile, drops the integrated graphics to a Radeon HD 8550G with 256 stream processors running at 515MHz but capable of boosting to the same 720MHz as the A10-5750M, while the Richland cores get a clock speed dip to 2.1GHz and 3.1GHz in Turbo Core mode. The same 4MB of L2 cache is included, but support for DDR3-1866 is lost, with 1,600MHz effective memory the fastest the A8 family can offer.

Dropping to the A6-5350M results in sacrificing significant graphics performance, with the integrated Radeon HD 8450G offering only 192 stream processors albeit at the faster speed of 533MHz boosting to 720MHz. The Richland CPU cores, meanwhile, run at an impressive 2.9GHz boosting to 3.5GHz, but there are but two - and just 1MB of L2 cache between them. Finally, the entry-level A4-5150M drops to a Radeon HD 8350G GPU with 128 stream processors running at 514MHz and boosting to 720MHz, while its dual Richland CPU cores run at 2.7GHz boosting to 3.3GHz with the same 1MB of L2 cache. Both chips top out with DDR3-1600 memory, while also supporting low-power and ultra-low power DDR3L-1600 and DDR3U-1333 modules.

The Piledriver basis for the Richland processors is shared with Trinity, meaning the parts will be a simple drop-in replacement for laptop makers - hence AMD's hopes of seeing the first products based on the chips hitting the market as soon as the end of the month.

When the parts do finally hit retail, they'll come with yet another rebrand for AMD's APU line. Now, the APUs - formerly known as Fusion, then Vision - will come with revised logos that detail the A-series family to which the chip belongs along with the number of processing cores included. The A10 family will also be differentiated from its cheaper brethren with an exclusive 'Elite Quad Core' branding flash.

Formal performance figures for the parts have yet to be confirmed, but AMD is sticking with its claims that chips offer up to 50 per cent greater performance than equivalent Intel parts - including the somewhat disingenuous claim that the A10-5750M is 50 per cent faster than the far more expensive Intel Core i7-3520M, based purely on their respective performance in the DirectX 11 3DMark Fire Strike benchmark using only integrated graphics processing.

The Richland APUs are also the first to support AMD's new library of user experience tweaks, including Face Login, Gesture Control, and Screen Mirror DLNA-compatible display sharing capabilities. If you're wondering whether that's worth getting excited about, have a shufti at the brief demo video below.

5 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
Hustler 13th March 2013, 11:20 Quote
"the Richland APUs are claimed to offer a 20 to 40 per cent boost in performance over current-generation APU products"

Presumably they're referring to graphics performance.?

Whilst improvement to gaming performance is welcome, CPU performance is where these chips will still be lacking compared to Intel, IPC per core will no doubt still be as second rate as the desktop parts.
Gareth Halfacree 13th March 2013, 11:34 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hustler
Presumably they're referring to graphics performance?
Given that it's graphics performance that leads AMD to claim the new A10 is "50 per cent faster" than a Core-i7, I'm going with "yes." We'll know more once actual benchmark results are available.
Marquee 13th March 2013, 12:22 Quote
From what I understand the new Richland APU will have ever more refined graphics core, better memory controller (I guess some one is listening), better energy efficiency and best of all you can pair it up with different architectural generations for Crossfire.

This is like the 2013 version of current APU. Couple tweaks, some mods and hopefully it should hold us off til Kaveri comes at the end of the year.

I don't think this will send hordes of people for an upgrade but any one buying soon will still keep the APU in mind. As we all know Haswell is due this June, Richland is a beefed up better competitor for Haswell to face till the end of the year.
runadumb 13th March 2013, 12:37 Quote
I am keeping an eye on Richland but seeing as my problem with the A10-5800K is mainly CPU bound (emulators) I think I will hold off for Kaveri.
MSHunter 14th March 2013, 00:53 Quote
And here I thought the might actually do something useful like up the stream cores to IDK 500 this is basically the same amount of iGP power as before.

AMD really need to focus on what they do best low cost alternatives. with more stream cores they would really have a contender for general purpose gaming PCs. Either that or return to handcrafted CPU designs and give Intel a run for the money again. This makes me sad I really wish they would invest more in R&D.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums