The new range of SSDs from OCZ and SandForce haven't been detailed, but are known to include models with 6Gb/s SAS interfaces.
If you're still not convinced that solid-state storage has hit the performance levels you'd like, a collaboration between OCZ and SandForce might just change your mind with a range of 6Gb/s SSD devices.
The devices, which will use SandForce's SF-1500 and SF-1200 SSD processors depending on the model, will be available both in the more traditional consumer-level 3Gb/s SATA interface along with the decidedly enterprise-grade 6Gb/s SAS interface - potentially offering the fastest burst rate of any drive currently available.
Storage hasn't been forgotten, either: OCZ's SandForce-based SSDs will be available in sizes ranging from 50GB to an impressive 400GB, although the company has yet to confirm pricing for any models in the range. The company has, however, promised to firm up the details and offer some concrete information on the product range before presenting the devices atCES in 2010.
Ryan Petersen, chief executive officer of OCZ said of the partnership that "
OCZ is committed to delivering SSD solutions to our enterprise clients and also has a strong following for our consumer solid state products; partnering with SandForce enables us to offer an even more robust offering to both these markets."
Although actual performance information for the devices hasn't yet been released, the use of the new 6Gb/s interface holds the promise of an extremely fast drive - although the use of 6Gb/s SAS rather than 6Gb/s SATA indicates the desire to sell the product to the enterprise market, which may well - at least at first - price it out of the reach of your average consumer.
Will you be trying to get your hands on a 6Gb/s SSD, or is this purely one for enterprise-grade rapid-access database servers? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
16 Comments
Discuss in the forums Reply+1 :)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/11/sandforce_c_round/
Very true
becasue i like a lot of people convert videos on my pc and then transfer them over to another device and make backups of my pc's hdd i can't keep multiple backups of thee c drive with a ssd this small becauce i have a couple games on it and i only have 4 sata ports on pc motherboard (without pci card to add more) so you can only get at most 2tb why is it so small when we have 1.5/2tb hdd and we have 64gb usb memory sticks and they are small you can even get 32gb sd cards?
am i wrong or if you can get 32gb on an sd card why can't you fit at least a tb on an ssd it shouldnt be that hard?
Huge SSDs would be great but all you need, as you say, is the OS on it to make Windows and the apps used really nice and responsive and load pretty much instantly. You don't need to put games on it really either as it doesn't improve FPS, it just saves a few seconds loading times.
I got the Crucial 128GB SSD for £219 and I'm glad I did. I install most of my games to an F3 and they all load quick enough anyway to not need to fill my SSD.
but instead of this im waiting for sata 3 which should be better and i have a terrabite hdd and a 200gb for a backup of c drive
(partioned in to 3)
1. 200 gb (c drive)
2. about 700+ (d drive)
3. arround 200gb (f drive)
becasue they dont affect registry
sorry for double post missed some stuff out