bit-tech.net

Collins launches Mini DisplayPort screens

Collins launches Mini DisplayPort screens

The Collins CinemaView range of Mini DisplayPort-equipped monitors borrows from Apple's own displays.

A third party manufacturer has finally taken up the challenge posed by adopting Apple's Mini DisplayPort specification with a range of monitors aimed firmly at the Mac user on a budget.

As reported over on Electronista, Collins America has launched a range of LCD displays dubbed CinemaView – no relation to Apple's own range of Cinema Displays, of course – and in doing so has become one of the select few manufacturers beside Apple to adopt the Mini DisplayPort.

“Borrowing” design cues from the official Apple range of monitors, the CinemaView models are unlikely to offend anyone's aesthetic sensibilities. The displays use cheaper – and, unsurprisingly, lower-quality – panels compared to Apple's own range, but for the buyer on a budget it's a reasonable alternative to procuring a standard PC monitor: furthermore, it means that the native Mini DisplayPort output found on modern Macs can be used without needing an extra adaptor.

The range is broken in to three models: a 19” version with a 1440x900 resolution which will retail at $299, a 20” running at a 1680x1050 resolution for $399, and a top-end 1920x1080 full-HD 24” panel rounds the range off at $499. All the monitors are equipped with Mini DisplayPort, audio input, and three USB ports.

The pricing is certainly competitive when compared with original Apple equipment: the $499 24” model competes directly with the 24” Apple LED Cinema Display at a whopping $899. While the Apple version gets you some added bonuses – including higher quality panel, MagSafe power connector, and a 1920x1200 resolution – many will be wondering if it's really worth the extra.

The range is due to go live online – at a site, incidentally, which bears more than a passing resemblance to the Apple Store – at the end of August this year, customers in the US and EU being offered a pre-order bonus of free shipping.

Any Mac users tempted into a cheap Mini DisplayPort equipped extra monitor, or are these displays nothing but cheap and nasty rip-offs of original Apple designs? Share your thoughts over in the forums.

11 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
B1GBUD 15th April 2009, 15:48 Quote
Seeing as most Mac users buy them for the "brand"... I doubt they'll be many that can force themselves to settle for anything less.

I don't know how much difference there is in cost when compaired to a similarly spec'd Apple display but I'm sure the Elitist's won't be buying them.
Johnny Bravo 15th April 2009, 16:04 Quote
Considering the striking similarities to both the displays AND the website I have to wonder if this company will survive the ever watching eye of Apples law team?
shigllgetcha 15th April 2009, 16:08 Quote
^^ will they not be paying rolaties for using apples port, so apple wont care
will. 15th April 2009, 16:15 Quote
Display port isn't apple's invention is it? They are just the first to adopt it I think...

They look cool, but I bet they are incredibly tacky feeling. If apple gets one thing right with their products, it's how solid they all feel.
Farting Bob 15th April 2009, 16:30 Quote
what is the advantage in using mini displayport over normal displayport in a desktop monitor?
mclean007 15th April 2009, 16:56 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by shigllgetcha
^^ will they not be paying rolaties for using apples port, so apple wont care
Even if they are paying royalties, Apple will care deeply if they consider sales are being diverted from their own products to lookalikes which infringe Apple's design rights.
Cei 15th April 2009, 17:22 Quote
@will
DisplayPort isn't Apple's invention, but MiniDisplayPort is. They've opened up the license so anybody can make MDP equipment without paying a royalty, so it's actually quite useful for providing tiny tiny display ports on such things as laptops.


The big difference between these cheap TN+ screens and Apple's S/H-IPS panels is exactly that, the panels. Oh, and the LED backlight on the Apple, which also ramps the price up over a CCFL. Apple's 24" ACD is expensive, but compared to other LED, IPS screens it is actually competitive.
fodder 15th April 2009, 18:07 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Farting Bob
what is the advantage in using mini displayport over normal displayport in a desktop monitor?

If you own a newer apple laptop that uses the miniport you don't have to pay apple to get an adapter to use every other monitor in the world. You do still have to buy one if you want to use a projector though.
frojoe 15th April 2009, 22:37 Quote
You can bash on apple all you want, but their displays are gorgeous. Whether or not they are worth the money is just like non apple screens. Some people just want the pixels, others care about color accuracy and black levels among other things. I don't have an apple screen because I can't afford it, but I've seen them and they look great. Now apple users can pick a crap screen just like pc users. For the record I use both platforms about 50% of the time.
LordPyrinc 16th April 2009, 02:58 Quote
I've not seen an apple screen in action, I haven't even been on a MAC in about 10 years (and that one was not mine). I am typically willing to spend a premium these days on better quality screens, but there are many people out there that are on a budget. I think its a good idea for a company to provide cheaper/larger screens (albeit at a lower quality) than those sold by Apple.
pizan 17th April 2009, 13:59 Quote
Just a warning that this might be a scam. Link It seems that arstechnica also had this story and its from some guy who is wanted in the US for scamming people for apple accessories or something
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...