bit-tech.net

Sparkle coats GPU coolers with diamond-like carbon

Sparkle coats GPU coolers with diamond-like carbon

Sparkle says that a diamond-like carbon membrane reduced the temperature of a GeForce 9500 GT from 88°C to 83°C

If you’ve ever performed a search for ‘thermal conductivity’ then you’ll know that a diamond encrusted heatsink is the Holy Grail of coolers, and not because it would have more bling than a gansta rapper’s necklace collection. The precious material has a thermal conductivity of up to six times that of copper when measured in watts per metre-Kelvin , and it’s robust too. This is probably why Sparkle has gone for the next best thing in its latest ‘Diamonds Sputtering’ heatsink technology, which involves coating the GPU’s heatsink in diamond-like carbon (DLC).

Of course, diamond-like carbon hasn’t been anywhere near a diamond; it’s just an amorphous form of carbon that has some of the same characteristics. Sparkle says that these include ‘high heat conduction,’ and claims that a coating of the material on a heatsink reduced the temperature of a GeForce 9500 GT from 88°C to 83°C in its own tests – a drop of 5°C.

Explaining the technology, Sparkle pointed out that diamonds dissipate heat in four times the speed as copper because the heat is transferred by phonons, which are produced by vibrations in the crystal lattice of the stones. This differs from heat conduction via a standard metal heatsink, which relies on the movement of electrons in the metal. The company says that DLC can replicate this effect, dispersing heat via a ‘graphite metal bond and a diamond insulation bond (the covalent bond).’

Sparkle also notes that the coating has other advantages, including its ‘super-hard carbon coating,’ which the company says can ‘protect the radiator metal from scratching.’ The company also says that the DLC membrane isolates air from the heatsink, which avoids any reduction in thermal conductivity that occurs due to oxidation, as well as protecting the heatsink from water vapour and erosion.

Sparkle hasn’t announced any graphics cards based on the technology yet, saying that the cost of is currently too high, but says that it will now ‘consider the appropriate application step-by-step’ before announcing new products.

Could DLC-coated heatsinks be the next big thing in cooling technology, or is it a misguided publicity stunt? Let us know your thoughts in the forums.

16 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
V3ctor 17th February 2009, 13:32 Quote
that's just bullocks...
[USRF]Obiwan 17th February 2009, 14:04 Quote
A few days ago I read a story about a "carbon like material" that was 58% times stronger then diamond. So this can be truthful.
Psytek 17th February 2009, 14:24 Quote
I don't doubt that this compound has higher thermal conductivity then copper... but will it ever be affordable enough. Making usual carbon compounds like these, carbon fibre, nanotubes and graphene all suffer from limited growth because of their prohibitive manufacturing costs.

A solid silver heat sink would be better than copper, but it doesn't matter because its too expensive.
Psytek 17th February 2009, 14:25 Quote
that should say *unusual carbon compounds
Kúsař 17th February 2009, 15:13 Quote
So basicaly - it transforms heat to light? I love physics :D
Krikkit 17th February 2009, 15:41 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kúsař
So basicaly - it transforms heat to light? I love physics :D

No, the transfer is from phonons, not photons. They're different things, although they are rooted in the same mathematical description from statistical mechanics. A phonon is best though of (as long as you don't want to start bustin' some science on it) as the vibration of a molecule within a lattice vibrating. The "connection" with the other lattice sites allows for a fast transfer of vibration, much faster than the poor old conduction electrons.

This sounds like an interesting material and if it can be made cheaply enough, a great alternative to an all-copper heatsink. After all, carbon is pretty damn abundant, whereas copper will inevitably run out sooner or later.
DXR_13KE 17th February 2009, 16:42 Quote
metals prices have started to go up... this is a logical step in the right direction.
Jack_Pepsi 17th February 2009, 16:59 Quote
Paying through the teeth for 5°C which isn't set in stone... pfft!
ChielScape 17th February 2009, 19:09 Quote
"This differs from heat conduction via a standard metal heatsink, which relies on the movement of electrons in the metal."
Electrons? What? When did the Laws of Nature change without anyone telling me?

heat is the energy that particles posses by vibrating, passing that vibration onto other particles is how heat transfers trough solids and fluids. (it can pass trough a vaccuum and transparent materials as radiation)

I dont know if Ben just copied it or wrote this himself, so i wont automatically direct this at him, but the guy who came up with that is a class A idiot.
E.E.L. Ambiense 17th February 2009, 19:32 Quote
Meh. I take 30° off my cards simply by putting them on water. :p

In all seriousness, I'll believe it when I see the proof.
HourBeforeDawn 17th February 2009, 19:59 Quote
so is this like that IC 7 Diamond thermal compound but just even more refined?
alpaca 17th February 2009, 22:05 Quote
no it is some carbon fooled into thinking it is diamond... and it acts like it too, so it (should) conduct heat better
The_Beast 17th February 2009, 22:45 Quote
I'm going to need proof of it first before even thinking of buying it
Horizon 18th February 2009, 01:49 Quote
why don't they make heatsink out of the stuff they used to wildfireproof a house from smash lab, it was amazing it resembled plexi but it doesn't even burn and transfers heat almost instantly, they put it under a torch for a few minutes and was able to be handled with bare hands almost immediately. they need to make heatsinks out of that stuff.
desertstalker 18th February 2009, 02:40 Quote
That "stuff" is an insulator, it work very poorly as a heatsink. The reason you could handle it straight away is because it doesn't absorb any heat.
sui_winbolo 18th February 2009, 07:37 Quote
This sounds expensive.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...