Packard Bell last night pulled the curtains back on its entry into the netbook market at an event in Central London.
Packard Bell last night pulled the curtains back on its entry into the netbook market at an event in Central London.
The dot is an 8.9-inch netbook which Packard Bell says is the first that's apparently specially designed for mainstream consumers. That's a pretty bold claim to make, but Packard Bell is late to the netbook party currently controlled by Asus with its hugely successful Eee PC line.
Packard Bell said last night that it has been watching the netbook market with interest, but believes that nearly all of the models on the market have been designed with business users--and not consumers--in mind.
It packs everything you'd expect an Atom based notebook to have - a 1.6GHz N270 Atom processor, 1GB of RAM, a 1,024 x 600 8.9-inch display are all present. What's more there's a 160GB hard drive, three USB 2.0 ports, a five-in-one card reader, 802.11b/g wireless, an integrated webcam and an optional 3G module.
The manufacturer has decided to offer Windows XP as the only operating system choice on the dot - there's no Linux OS for the community to dig their teeth into this time around.
Packard Bell says that the machine will start at £299--what's not clear are the optional upgrades since there is no OS choice--and it'll be available from PC World in January 2009.
What do you think to Packard Bell's entry into this market? Let us know
in the forums.
Also at £299 it will have stiff competition from PCworlds own Advent series (4211 being a rebranded MSI wind).
Also I note that its specs are identical to most of the netbooks already out so how can Packard bell claim this is focused only at the consumer (if its the same as the others on the market?!)
incidentally its not an entry into the market they already had a rebranded via nanobook out a while back....
someone really needs to make a netbook with a different spec one of these days... as it it you may as well buy on price (or looks if youre shallow) as there is nothing else to differentiate them
That would be the extra price they charge. ;)
Beside, Packard Bell's were crap back when they made Pentium PCs.
Actually (if you set aside Asus, their 901H has a smaller HDD) the only thing that differs is the battery. The Acer, MSI etc. all use a 3 cell battery which basically sucks, who'd want a Netbook if the battery still lasts for only 3 hours or less?
The Asus 1000H has a 6 cell battery, the battery life is much longer (about twice that time obviously) as I know from personal experience.
Ah, thanks for that. I read the title and thought to my self "WTF? Didn't they go out of business quite a long time ago?"
I bought one a few weeks ago....but I didn't get any cookies :(
Couldn't find this on their websites though.
Why don't netbooks have 1000 Ethernet? Its not really more expensive anymore?
To fill 160GB over 100 Network takes ages.
http://www.case-modder.de/wcf/images/smilies/cookie.png
As soon as one appears with tv out then I am replacing my laptop with a netbook. It's a shame none of them even offer tv out over the vga socket
The Samsung would be my choice at this price point purely for better appearance.
Puuuuh *wipebrow* I thought I was the only one using TV out here :D