Intel Nehalem and X58 are just six weeks away.
Tentatively set your calenders because week 44, or late October, since this is when X58 and Nehalem's Bloomfield boards will arrive for us consumers.
Well, maybe. Between
hearing the news and
writing the news there was an insinuation that Intel might push it back because the new chipset and architecture
might have a few issues, although we've yet to confirm anything for sure.
We're not talking G45 delays, but we're aware some motherboard engineers are upset with Intel because even this late in the day it's suggesting component changes, which could affect design and sampling schedules. With only a short while to go Intel might be giving the Taiwanese a few ulcers!
We've also been told that Intel's premium X58 chipset alone will cost $70, making the boards quite expensive, but this is not unexpected and by no means completely insane like Nvidia launching the nForce 790i Ultra SLI with a chipset that cost $100+. Instead just expect new technologies to charge a happy premium for the time being.
If you're the big business type and want workstation and server parts, you're in luck because those should launch four weeks earlier in week 40. Single socket Xeons are where we'll get the first idea of Nehalem performance over Penryn, however it makes us wonder
why Intel are moving so early to its new architecture with Penryn doing so well.
Too quick, too expensive, not here fast enough? Let us know your thoughts in
the forums.
11 Comments
Discuss in the forums Replynot bad for next generation system.
I want my 32 core, 22nm Sandy bridge NOW!
I do hope AMD do pull another Athlon64 on them.
That'll force more innovation, more price drops and quicker.
you only need one because in that sentence you know
want a editor? :P
Not just one because, but an almost entire re-wording.
So, um... week 44 is the very end of October, not September. :)
8 weeks before the end of the year, and all that...
And the interval of week 40 to week 44 is basically the month of October.
sigh replacing a because with since doesn't make sense either.
Tetatively set your calenders FOR week 44, or late September, since this is when ..... etc etc..
Tentatively set your calendars, (not the comma) because week 44 - or late september - is when..... etc etc....