Intel Nehalem workstation and server boards were also on show
Despite the fact that we had the corporate "we can neither confirm nor deny Tylersberg will be called X58" speech from Intel itself, it seems pretty obvious from the plenty of manufacturers on show at its own stand that it will be the intended name.
First off, the Abit IX58-MAX - don't take the cooling (on any board) too seriously yet, we're sure it'll get heatpiped eventually. Abit looks to have gone for a standard eight phase power regulation rather than digital PWMs this time although the rest of the board looks typically Abit in style - blue PCB and black slots.
Both Foxconn and Asus had their mainstream boards on show - no doubt wanting to keep their respective gaming series under wraps until nearer the time of launch. Many boards are now featuring four x16 lanes because the X58 chipset has 36 PCI-Express 2.0 to play with, so four x8 slots and an x4 is certainly viable now.
Gigabyte again makes a familiar looking board, however there are a couple of odd SATA placements at the bottom. The Intel reference design has a quite strange northbridge placement but otherwise looks as unremarkable as usual. We're seeing less and less PCI slots on these motherboards in favour of PCI-Express x1 instead - how soon until they are phased out entirely like EISA was back in 2001 with Socket A Athlons and later Socket 370 Intel Coppermines?
There are also many server boards on display - X58 will feature on the very high end so the performance also overlaps here. Because of the direct connect nature of the CPU to memory there is more PCB space and these boards look similar to AMD Opteron now.
Do you
really want one? Do they look how you'd expected? Let us know your thoughts in the forums.
22 Comments
Discuss in the forums Replyhope we'll still have as much freedom in heatsink mounting direction as the current square ones.
Uh, otherwise the heatsink mount holes look to be square... good, any orientation.
Don't be too sure - these are very very early boards.
RE: FB-DIMMs, you know, I completely forgot to ask but I would say no - they are simply Registered ECC DDR3 because they've no need to be fully buffered anymore as there's no central MCH and no need to reduce the trace count.
Think about it this way - if Intel asks your for support, you will want to be there. However, by being there all the competition knows what you are doing, so this is the only way Asus gets to win at both keeping its cards close to its chest and providing support.
That they neither deny nor confirm that x58 will be called x58 is rather stupid though, especially considering they have boards with x58 in the name at their own stand.
And I suppose x58 will be cooler running now it doesn't have to do memory controlling.
edit: the post doesn't seem to link here, though I may be being stupid.
That was my line of thought, too. If Intel still can't get the power consumption of their chipsets down after removing the vast majority of the logic from their northbridge, that's pretty sad.
Cool! :) As they wasted a lot of energy IMAO...
That's not true - X58 uses MORE power because of the super fast high frequency QPI links. At least, in its current revision it does - this could change.
ssj12 - it's not about Intel Licensing SLI, it's about Nvidia letting Intel license it.
It's not a limitation due to Intel, its nvidia not allowing it.
I'm a little surprised that recent Intel mobo's are able to carry Crossfire, but there's no agreement in place for SLi.