bit-tech.net

Former Rock employee stole £220,000 of stock

Former Rock employee stole £220,000 of stock

Rock's former head of sales, Paul Bicknell, was in "something of a fantasy world" after he stole computers to fund a lifestyle of fast cars and gambling.

Yesterday it became apparent that Rock, once one of the UK's leading specialist notebook manufacturers, had gone into administration.

In the statement issued on its website, the failure was partly blamed on a former employee who was involved in stock misappropriation. Today, it's come to light that 24-year-old Paul Bicknell, former head of sales, stole more than £200,000 worth of computers over a period starting in 2005 and continuing through past his resignation in July 2007.

Bicknell was hired by the firm at the age of 16 and worked his way through the ranks to become head of sales and the main contact for CFA Trading, one of Rock's regular customers.

CFA said that it found Bicknell to be "helpful and always willing to assist" with its purchases, however in 2006 the company noticed that its payments weren't making it through to Rock's accounts.

At the same time, the former head of sales started driving expensive sports cars and became addicted to gambling online, living in "something of a fantasy and unreal world," according to his solicitor.

Bicknell began to chase losses and a month after he left the company in July 2007, he broke into Rock's warehouse and stole computers worth £11,497 – he then sold these machines.

The total loss to Rock is reported to be in the region of £220,000, but when courts attempted to recoup some of the losses, the court could only make a nominal £1 payment because Bicknell was penniless. Bicknell is now serving a three-year sentence after admitting to nine charges of theft brought upon him in court.

Although this is a massive amount of money—and it was enough to cause Rock to lose its credit and cause cashflow problems—I don't believe it's the only thing that caused the £5 million turnover-per-year company to crash. Custom PC reports that people close to Rock have said not all the blame should be placed on Bicknell, although no allegations have been confirmed.

Discuss in the forums.

22 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
Hg 9th May 2008, 18:33 Quote
one word 'dick'
M4RTIN 9th May 2008, 19:23 Quote
theres got to be more to it than this. i can understand losing £220,000 would cause some serious probblem for them, but to just fold lke this seems a bit much.
MrWillyWonka 9th May 2008, 19:50 Quote
I'm even more surprised that the finance department did not even notice missing money for over two years or if they did why did they not attempt to resolve it sooner!
RTT 9th May 2008, 19:51 Quote
Sounds like just the tip of the iceberg
Atomic 9th May 2008, 20:27 Quote
No wonder they've gone into administration! That's alot of money to loose for any company.
hughwi 9th May 2008, 21:06 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic
No wonder they've gone into administration! That's alot of money to loose for any company.

Yeah, it is an even larger amount of money to not realise has gone missing over a 2/3 year period!
Glider 9th May 2008, 21:10 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughwi
Yeah, it is an even larger amount of money to not realise has gone missing over a 2/3 year period!

It's not like it dissapeared at once... It cumulated over the years I recon... Stealing 200000 at once is noticed by everyone, stealing 1 a day is much more... subtile...
Rum&Coke 9th May 2008, 21:10 Quote
nothing to see here
Cupboard 9th May 2008, 21:34 Quote
If I had anything to do with Rock, I would want to wring his neck at the moment.
Its a real shame they have died. On the bright side it does show this guy up and make him look like a right *******.
sotu1 9th May 2008, 21:37 Quote
there is no way the theft of 200,000 can cause a company to go under. there's more to this, thats a definate
julianmartin 9th May 2008, 21:46 Quote
well actually that is quite possible, if the shareholders first found out about this they would probably bail on the company...no investment = crippled company.

they are probably all asking the same question and wondering how it never got detected, hence their faith in the company gone. quite plausible really...

if their turnover is only 5 million, 200,000 is ALOT in terms of profit.
Ryu_ookami 9th May 2008, 21:46 Quote
How does losing 220,000 over a 2 to 3 year period cause a company that has 5 million pound turn over PER YEAR cause it to go into administration? There's something dodgy there, no two ways about it.

Especially when 11,000 odd of that is in computers that were stolen but presumably insured.
TheCherub 9th May 2008, 22:18 Quote
Insurance doesn't necessarily pay out that quickly, and cashflow is always a killer in business.

Whilst £200,000 doesn't sound like a lot on roughly £15million turnover (over 3 years), when you consider how tight the margins are in the PC business it isn't actually all that surprising.
docodine 9th May 2008, 22:59 Quote
Rock is that big of a company? I've never seen ads outside of Bit-tech. :?
ChaosDefinesOrder 9th May 2008, 23:18 Quote
Turnover does not equal profit. There may have been a 5M turnover per year, but if the margins are sufficiently tight, that could equate to maybe 1M or maybe even less in yearly profit...

200K is therefore a lot to lose in this sort of circumstance. The main killer, however, seems to have been with the company's credit. Can't secure the parts for a reasonable cost, can't make the profit...

It is a shame that Rock has gone down, but at the same time, gaming notebooks are still very much a niche thing and therefore by its very nature a rather turbulent sector... (possibly going to explain the tight margins)
LordPyrinc 10th May 2008, 01:11 Quote
If the company could miss this level of theft from one of their employees, its no wonder that they are on the rocks. If they can't manage their own assets and employees, then how could they continue to compete in the business world? There is a fine line between knowing what is going on and micro-managing your staff, but seriously, this theft should not have been overlooked.
Tim S 10th May 2008, 07:44 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by julianmartin
well actually that is quite possible, if the shareholders first found out about this they would probably bail on the company...no investment = crippled company.

they are probably all asking the same question and wondering how it never got detected, hence their faith in the company gone. quite plausible really...

It's a PLC, so shareholders wouldn't have bailed since there are no 'public' investors.
Tim S 10th May 2008, 07:47 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChaosDefinesOrder
Turnover does not equal profit. There may have been a 5M turnover per year, but if the margins are sufficiently tight, that could equate to maybe 1M or maybe even less in yearly profit...

200K is therefore a lot to lose in this sort of circumstance. The main killer, however, seems to have been with the company's credit. Can't secure the parts for a reasonable cost, can't make the profit...

It is a shame that Rock has gone down, but at the same time, gaming notebooks are still very much a niche thing and therefore by its very nature a rather turbulent sector... (possibly going to explain the tight margins)

That's very true. Turnover doesn't equal profit and margins are incredibly tight in the IT sector (thanks to people like Dell). The lack of credit will be a killer, but I think there is more to it than just Bicknell's thefts.
phuzz 10th May 2008, 09:56 Quote
I used to work at Evesham Micros and their profit margin was something like 6% on each PC, I'm guessing Rock's wasn't much better.

(just don't ask where half the components in my last pc came from...)
Phil Rhodes 10th May 2008, 10:24 Quote
What's a "habbit?", other than a cross between something one does habitually and a small, big-footed Tolkein creature?
p3n 10th May 2008, 14:01 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic
No wonder they've gone into administration! That's alot of money to loose for any company.

Far more serious is the fact no-one on the internet can spell lose!
Kipman725 10th May 2008, 14:05 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotu1
there is no way the theft of 200,000 can cause a company to go under. there's more to this, thats a definate

hmm I have heard of other companies going bust because of massive emplyee stealing to fund gambling habits before. Quite often if somone is very high up in a medium sized company then no one is checking up on them. Suddenly the company has £1m missing they thought they had which can put them in the red.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums