Seitz launches 160MP camera

The Seitz Phototechnik 6x17 160-megapixel camera: pocket-size it ain't.

In the market for a new digital camera, but want something with a decently high resolution? Well, Seitz Phototechnik has exactly what you're looking for in its new 6x17 camera: 160 megapixels of glorious colour.

I'll say that again: one hundred and sixty megapixels. Yes, that's insane. You'll need a fairly hefty PC, too though: each image in 48-bit uncompressed TIFF format comes out at a rather hefty 900MB. The resolution of each photo is 7,500x21,250: that's almost 77 times the resolution of a 1080p high-definition video.

Looking like some kind of steampunk prop, the camera has a pair of chromed hand grips at either side of the body. I'm not entirely certain why, if I'm honest: at a whopping 45cm width and weighing 4.5 kilogrammes you're unlikely to be taking snapshots with it when you're out-and-about.

It's not much cop for taking action shots of fast-moving subjects either; the camera manages to capture such a prodigious resolution through 'scanning back', which works in much the same way as a flatbed scanner, moving the sensor along a predetermined route to capture a series of smaller images which are automatically pieced together into a larger whole. Although the new camera has one of the fastest scanning backs around, capable of capturing a full-resolution 6x17 image in a single second, it's still too long to capture fast motion.

There's no compatibility with memory cards, either: instead, the camera comes equipped with a gigabit Ethernet port for zipping the photos off to a host PC. If you really need to be out and about – and you've been building your muscles – the company offers a tablet PC which can strap to the back to make it 'portable'. Hmm.

If you're needing the ultimate in high-res photography you probably won't let the drawbacks put you off. The cost of joining the ultra-high-def set? £21,817, lens extra - and that's just the base model. Better start saving up now, then.

Ever had the chance to play with really high-tech kit, or are you stuck with a QVGA cameraphone? Give us a shout over in the forums.
Quote rhuitron 21st January 2008, 12:27
160 Mega Pixels of Picture.

making Pron From Great. To High Def Pron.

Anything better than That?.
Quote antiHero 21st January 2008, 12:27
I really wonder what the market is? Who the hell needs this?
I have a 7.1 mp casio exilim for taking snapshots and I only use 5mp of it. I know that there are semi professional photographers around here who need more res but I don't.
just my 2 cents
Quote AlexB 21st January 2008, 12:40
its not for taking snaps with though, is it guys, its for proper photography, weather thats from in planes or whatever.
Quote samkiller42 21st January 2008, 13:06
Hum, could be tempting:D
Just worked out, you would need about 40 30" Widescreen monitors to view a pic at full size, so at £1000 each roughly, thats roughly £61,000 for the screens and camera, not including the machine to power that amount of screens, heh

Sam

P.S: it was rough calculation, so my maths maybe out a little.
Quote mclean007 21st January 2008, 13:40
For mapping, geological surveying etc. this is perfect. You generally don't need high speed for that kind of work, but you do often need to capture a wide area that you can then zoom in to very high detail. For example, the planes that take the overhead shots used in Google Earth / Maps likely use something like this, as do satellites used for ground surveys. I'd imagine telescopes / microscopes are often fitted with ultra-high res sensors as well. For a snapshot of your nearest and dearest on holiday, 7-10MP as offered by current compact cameras is more than enough, and the limiting factor is generally to do with the lens and the quality of the sensor, rather than its resolution.
Quote identikit 21st January 2008, 14:23
Quote:
Originally Posted by mclean007
For mapping, geological surveying etc. this is perfect. You generally don't need high speed for that kind of work, but you do often need to capture a wide area that you can then zoom in to very high detail. For example, the planes that take the overhead shots used in Google Earth / Maps likely use something like this, as do satellites used for ground surveys. I'd imagine telescopes / microscopes are often fitted with ultra-high res sensors as well. For a snapshot of your nearest and dearest on holiday, 7-10MP as offered by current compact cameras is more than enough, and the limiting factor is generally to do with the lens and the quality of the sensor, rather than its resolution.

But the exposure time for this camera is 1 second, far too slow for use in planes.
Quote Bluephoenix 21st January 2008, 14:59
not entirely true.

if you're at altitude in a slower plane, this would still allow for VERY precise imagery.

I fly for the CAP on weekends, and do some aerial photography for them.

also this is good for large-scale geological research.

if you have it mounted on a helicopter or on foot you can take very high resolution images for later study, and even use multiple images to create 3 dimensional meshes.
Quote chicorasia 21st January 2008, 15:31
All types of commercial photography: vehicles, consumer products, food, fashion, architecture... Not to mention scientific/forensic/artwork photography... Oh, and plate shots for movie special effects....

Though you'd need some really good lenses to make the best use of all that resolution.

You can also crop out most of the picture and use only the area nearest to the lenses center axis - where you'll have the least distortion...
Quote Joeymac 21st January 2008, 15:39
Paparazzi will be strapping a humongo lens' on one of these babies and taking pictures from the horizon as we speak... celebrities beware.
Quote Jebus.exe 21st January 2008, 16:03
and i thought the 8mp cam on my LG phone was good...
Quote MrWillyWonka 21st January 2008, 16:12
Meh, only 20 times better than my camera.
Quote chrisb2e9 21st January 2008, 16:33
give it a year, that thing will be smaller than my watch.
Quote sotu1 21st January 2008, 16:56
definately a science research camera. not much use other than that. good to see technology pushin the boundary tho. gonna need a monstrous hard drive to store all those holiday snaps tho!
Quote Naked_Dave 21st January 2008, 17:38
It's not that special compared to some scanning backs used on large format cameras. The sensor is smaller for a start.
Quote outlawaol 21st January 2008, 18:51
A one second exposer time? Thats basically useless.... And why would you need something with that kinda of resolution?

Sounds like a toy really...

Give me a Canon 5D anyday....
Quote completemadness 21st January 2008, 19:29
What market is this _actually_ aimed at?
Quote proxess 21st January 2008, 19:38
its obviously aimed for softcore porn... where everything is sloooooooooow~
Quote Naked_Dave 21st January 2008, 21:33
Scanning backs are usually used for copying existing artwork, or for fine art landscapes or still life. They've been around for a long time! The quality of the photos from this, essentially a large format camera, will make even the most expensive DSLRs look like cameraphones.
Quote Amon 22nd January 2008, 03:01
Someone needs to make a neckstrap for this...
Quote Duste 22nd January 2008, 03:41
I'll have two!
Quote evox 22nd January 2008, 03:44
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhuitron
160 Mega Pixels of Picture.

making Pron From Great. To High Def Pron.

Anything better than That?.

with 160MP, they are going above xHD. more like Microscopic Porn O_o
Quote Aankhen 22nd January 2008, 08:05
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlawaol
A one second exposer time? Thats basically useless.... And why would you need something with that kinda of resolution?

Sounds like a toy really...

Give me a Canon 5D anyday....
Was ignoring every single post before yours a conscious decision, or did you just do it out of habit?
Quote supermonkey 22nd January 2008, 14:18
Quote:
Originally Posted by outlawaol
A one second exposer time? Thats basically useless.... And why would you need something with that kinda of resolution?

Sounds like a toy really...

Give me a Canon 5D anyday....
Before a shuttle is attached to the stack, one of our photo groups uses a scanning-back camera to take an ultra-high-resolution image of the shuttle's belly. This gives engineers an extremely detailed picture of the shuttle before launch. They use this as a reference photo to compare with photos taken from the ISS during shuttle approach as a method to check for possible tile damage.

This camera is not designed for the casual photographer. As others have said, engineering, high-end product, and art photography are the realistic uses for this camera.

-monkey
Quote gpw111 22nd January 2008, 20:22
160mp? check out gigapixl http://www.gigapxl.org/gallery-Peoria.htm ....
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.







Mobile Phones

LG Arena ReviewHTC Magic Review

Compare over 250 mobile phones &
52,000 deals!



Broadband

Mobile Broadband

Compare over 100 broadband & mobile broadband deals online!