Mainstream Nehalems not due for 18 months

Mainstream Nehalems not due for 18 months

The Nehalem core - you might not be seeing it for another 18 months though.

We've discussed the potential details of Nehalem before, as well as seen it running at IDF last September, but further details released today by Taiwanese media, Digitimes, cites that Intel's Nehalem will not see mainstream adoption until mid-2009.

The single socket, quad core "Bloomfield" CPU will be launched in Q4 this year, which will introduce a new socket: LGA1366. It is suggested to have a 270mm² die size - about the same as current Kentsfield’s 65nm 286mm² die - but it’ll have nearly 150m more transistors at 731m.

Mainstream parts will roll out several months later - some of which will be on yet another different socket and have an integrated GPU. Bloomfield, however, will not have an IGP.

Penryn dual core CPUs, Wolfdale, will still be available at the budget end of the market meaning that there will be no less than three Intel sockets with a mixture of technologies and performance propagating the market at the same time - no doubt this will likely be exceptionally confusing for the layman consumer.

The likelihood is that Intel is playing the marketing game again - nailing AMD into the ground with the fastest possible system almost as a proof of concept to help its marketeers, then gauging the competitions reaction before rolling out the rest of the product line. If Fusion is early (and genetically engineered pigs end up flying) and fantastic then we might see Nehalem rolled out early to compete, but if it's another Phenom launch all over again we could be in for a boring start to next year.

There's also no word on the release date for the next enthusiast platform to replace Skulltrail either; Nehalem-EX or, Beckton, which is cited to feature 8 cores each, dual processor, triple channel DDR3 and over 24MB of cache per CPU.

Intel's Nehalem looks good, at least on paper, just like AMD's Fusion, but we hope they are comparative competitors this time around - the market (and AMD's bottom line) certainly needs it.

Excited about Nehalem or Fusion? Or do you think it'll just be an over-complicated mess? Let us know your thoughts, in the forums.


Discuss in the forums Reply
yakyb 7th January 2008, 12:38 Quote
this isn't good news really shows a lack of competition as far as i'm concerned maybe it will allow them to spend more time on larrabee instead (all intel systems for 2010)
oasked 7th January 2008, 13:40 Quote
So when is the replacement for the Q6600 coming out? 7th January 2008, 14:25 Quote
man i am behind, is this the new 45nm core thats meant to replace the 65nm one or a new one :S?
[USRF]Obiwan 7th January 2008, 15:32 Quote
Yeah i'am confussed. Is this a all new 45nm quad or are the in november anounced chips delayed? ( i mean the cheap(er) 45nm quad) not the Extreme edition 45nm quad
rewind 7th January 2008, 16:11 Quote
Isn't that Wolfdale?
Demon Cleaner 7th January 2008, 17:54 Quote
The 45nm Yorkfield processors (that replace the Q6600) are out in Feb/March 2008. I thought they were coming out this month but I guess they got delayed.
Bindibadgi 7th January 2008, 17:59 Quote
Penryn 45nm (mainstream) is due out this year - Yorkfield and Wolfdale.

Nehalem has integrated memory controller and mainstream processors have integrated video too (aka AMD Fusion like). Nehalem will come with "up to 8 core" but really only one processor will have that. Most will have quad and some dual core. All will be 45nm.
oasked 7th January 2008, 18:21 Quote
Check out this article on [H]ardOCP. In particular, check out this slide.
Bindibadgi 7th January 2008, 18:33 Quote
Wow a 3.16GHz dual core is the same price as a 2.5GHz Quad core. The one you want is the 3GHz chip for $183 though.

Bargain++?? Should make a great gaming chip good for 4+GHz.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.

Discuss in the forums