No more PR+ ratings! I suppose "6000+" was a touch over optimistic anyway.
Do you remember when AMD reintroduced the PR rating back when it launched the Athlon XP (Thoroughbred "A") range? Or perhaps you've been around a bit longer and can remember the initial introduction back on Socket 7?
Well with the impending release of the Phenom processor and revamp to its whole line up in the next month or so, AMD will kit its new processors with a new naming scheme consisting of two letters and four numbers,
according to to Leslie Sobon, Director of Product and Brand Management at AMD.
The breakdown of the new code is as follows:
- First letter = Product Target Market: G = Premium, B = Intermediate, L = Value;
- Second Letter = Power Consumption: P = greater than 65W, S = around 65W, and E = less than 65W;
- First Digit = Product Family: 1xxx = Sempron or single cored Athlon, 2xxx = dual core Athlon, 6xxx = dual core Phenom, 7xxx = quad core Phenom;
- Second Digit = Core Frequency: The specifics are as yet undisclosed;
- Last two Digits = Future upgrade functions and specific differentiations
.
Since 32/64-bit coherence is now the norm for both Intel and AMD's ranges, and it's been quite a while since socket A Athlons were discontinued, AMD has decided to drop the 64 nomenclature entirely favouring just a simple "Athlon X2" instead.
The whole change over will take place over the next six months and we're already wondering what the new logo will look like, because
the 64-bitness has been a massive part of AMD's marketing for at least three years.
Do you think the new new naming scheme is more informative and will help with future processor decisions? Or do you just think it's more complicated for the sake of it and AMD will try to use it to make Bees sound like Gees? What is "
around 65W" -- hand wavy science? Let us know your thoughts
in the forums!
23 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyLeet user 2--Oh yah when its nothing compared to my GP7500
Me --- wait your chip is BS?
user 1 ---- yeah.
Me--- OK just checking.
Like Intel is doing with the "50s" and "20s" of their Core 2s.
that would be much better :D
what about working in the word "boobs" to the name?
Because hearing AMD marketing execs talking about "Boobs processors" makes my inner-12 year old chuckle with glee :D
fine fine.. I'll add something constructive ... I'm not really sure if this will really simplfy their brand recognition at all.. sounds like it will be confusing at first
great idea :D
They just don't want people to be able to easily compare their product to the competition.
LOL The BS CPU is a stupendous idea for AMD to implement
*grins as his tiny super PC plans actually seem to be working*
B-40W-1Core-1.5Ghz-2nd Rev. Die
How hard can it be to just make a simple naming scheme like that instead of using BS crap like G, B, L, and P, S, E or whatever. This whole technology world needs to get ahold of itself.
not that either of them are easy for the layman to understand
Mid = Banana
Low End = Door knob.
Granted, for the simplistic ones amongst us, I suppose it will be a little more effort to make the direct omfg, l33t, my 5000Mhz0r is so much bettAr than your t3h-suck 3000Mhz one lolz0R' ... comparisons, heh.
That was the nice thing with the 3200+ system or whatever, as long as AMD only made 1 chip with that spec, you knew what they had