Intel Configures Antennas for a Multi-Radio Future

Intel Configures Antennas for a Multi-Radio Future

Configurable antennas should make the future a wireless heaven.

Too Many Wire..lesses?

IDF SPRING 2007 By 2009 you could probably have something like six to ten radio devices inside your chosen mobile device. Not that you don’t already have 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth, 3G etc, but it’s going to get worse with the introduction of Wireless USB, DVB-HDTV, GPS, WiMAX and the release of the 60GHz band.

Intel is developing a configurable antenna technology to cope with this influx of new wireless technologies, and it's expected to be used in future notebooks and UMPCs.

By using a switching technology that quickly alternates the transmission components of the various wireless modules inside the device, it's possible to completely minimise interference between competing components and, at the same time, provide a transparent user experience.

Timing the use of the various radios allows the devices to operate and transmit in bursts in order to not have them both on simultaneously and interfere with each other. High level switching allows each one to talk in due process, but also not miss receiving packets and compromising speed.

The Bluetooth specification includes adaptive hopping to different channels which allows Bluetooth and WiFi to co-exist. However, with more radios and bands these specific pairing solutions get harder to solve and coexistence is more limited.

Intel highlighted that mix-matching products only creates further problems and working across the industry means that the interference will be easier reduced, while compatibility is increased. This also means that Intel aims to hold the standard, and therefore control it at the platform level. We guess this will mean Intel will license the technology out to other vendors.

We already have platforms like Centrino and Viiv that do this to an extent, but the platforms are more to do with a branding and use combinations of Intel-only components. What it doesn't mean is added functionality. Whilst this does potentially decrease consumer choice and therefore the free market, it does highlight a guarantee of use. This was also the attraction to platforms like Centrino in the first place and that's what made Centrino such a great success for Intel.


The 60GHz band is set to become a next generation personal area network, products will be looking to arrive around 2011 or 2012 at the cost effective consumer level. Why is it interesting? Pretty much every world government has an area of around 60GHz left unlicensed. This is a very large bit of unused spectrum that offers significant potential considering how cramped our airwaves already are.

60GHz is extremely high frequency, so building a radio capable is very challenging for silicon. Also, high frequency is very directional rather than omni-directional like standard 2.4GHz WiFi so it should be interesting how this develops, whether we see a personal area network inclusion into clothes or items that you carry around with all the time like mobile phones or keyrings.

Discuss in the forums


Discuss in the forums Reply
DarkLord7854 16th April 2007, 07:45 Quote
So wait.. is it a good thing or a bad thing? O.o
DougEdey 16th April 2007, 07:50 Quote
IMO it's a good thing, the 2.4GHz band is currently flooded with everything, it has 2.4GHz wireless, 2.4GHz AV signals and a lot more. And the Wireless band only has 5MHz increments between channels

2.6GHz is a relatively "clean" spectrum so you'll get less interference meaning less parity errors and a stronger signal strength.
sinizterguy 16th April 2007, 08:09 Quote
They need more antennas just to handle all the current stuff - leave alone this 60 GHz stuff.
Miser 16th April 2007, 09:37 Quote
Originally Posted by article
you could probably have something like
That's a little rough reading. ;)
Otherwise, great article!
Bindibadgi 16th April 2007, 14:33 Quote
It was rushed between keynotes tbh. Ive a LOT more detailed information on it but I'm seeing the wireless people later in the week so, given time, will put it all into a round up article when I get back (or on the plane, YAY for 10.5 hr flight but only a 3 hour battery).
Tim S 16th April 2007, 15:52 Quote
you need a ThinkPad X60s -- 10 hours baby!! :D
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.

Discuss in the forums