Smaller and faster - the new SAS Savvio series is aimed at the server market, but we bet we could find some uses.
Those of you familiar with server designs know how important a good RAID array can be. However, you also know what a pain it is to fit one in a decent rack setup. The sheer size and heat production of a 3.5" SCSI three-disk array for Raid 5 is one of the many things that make the technology hard to use - well,
Seagate has just fixed that.
The company has announced its new Savvio 15k line this week, and it's aiming straight at the heart of the server market (not that a few of us desktop afficionados wouldn't make use of it, too). The Savvio drives are SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) 15k RPM drives designed entirely for RAID setups. They come in only two sizes - 36GB and 73GB. So why do we care? Because they're only 2.5" drives.
The new Savvio drives are designed to fit
six drives in that same space as two 3.5" drives, allowing you a host of options all the way up to RAID 6 (or two full sets of RAID 5) where you formerly had only RAID 0 or 1. They will start appearing in the HP ProLiant server line first, and both IBM and Sun are also looking to get them in their lineups.
Of course, the space-saving features and speed of the drives beg the question - could we see these starting to appear in some modders' desktop setups as well? A SCSI RAID card just isn't that expensive anymore....
Would you consider playing around with drives like these? Let us know
in our forums.
Maybe seagate has finally decided that they can't make up their performance deficit with tech and has gone for making it up by quantity. :D
They will be expensive I am sure but so were 15k 3.5" not so long ago. Now we always get 15K 3.5" as there is very little if any price difference.
Not too long before we are putting these in dektops for sure.
Wikipedia's SAS article has the answer:
Still, an amazing feat of engineering if it's what you need. :D
they are very nice but unfortunatly cost a fortune, you can nearly get 2 standard 3.5" arrays for the same price.
also being SAS to take full advantage you need decent array controllers which push the price up further.
Sam
These drives are specifically targeted at enterprise level serving. We're talking hundreds of them in an array. For home uses, raptors would likely be faster, or offer the same speed as these drives just aren't optimised for single-user access patterns. For enterprise use, these (or any other 15k unit for that matter) would run circles around raptors, not to mention offering far better scaleability.
I doubt they'll be quite as high as £700... even data centre managers have budgets. I've just specced up a server with 2.5" SAS drives, although they weren't 15k. The 73Gb drives were only £165 (only...), so I wouldn't expect a £500 premium for a 33% increase in spin speed.
never the less, you're probably right. £700 is a bit steep. I suppose SAS/SCSI flagships usually retail at closer to £500.
Datacentre managers get better prices though. We just picked up around 1000 146GB 15k units, maybe we got a bulk discount ;)
Jaz_knos
Most co-locations charge on a per-U basis so the smaller you can make your server the cheaper your hosting costs.
You can't easily use 6 raptors in a 1U server, certainly not if you want to be able to hot-swap the drives.
6x 2.5" drives on the other hand is no problem.
So although you spend more on the HDDs initially you'll likely save that on the cost of hosting a smaller server. :)