EA posts $1 billion loss

EA posts $1 billion loss

Electronic Arts has posted a huge loss this year, despite an effort to bring new titles to market.

Electronic Arts has just published the figures for its year-end finances and revealed that the company had a net revenue of more than USD 4.2 billion dollars, up by 15 percent compared to last year.

Unfortunately though, the mega-publisher also managed to accrue a net loss of USD 1.1 billion, which is another increase for the company. Electronic Arts only lost USD 454 million last year.

Despite trying to bring new franchises to market in the last few years, EA has struggled to find financial security in the face of the global recession and has had to close some studios and fire some staff in an effort to streamline the business.

Despite some of the hardships faced by the publisher, CEO John Riccitiello has remained optimistic and assures gamers that the company will persevere through the economic crisis successfully. Recession, says Riccitiello, is a good thing for gamers.

"EA's strong cost actions in Q4 FY09 together with our investments in our digital service businesses will set us up for a stronger" Riccitiello said to Eurogamer. "EA is well positioned with the right strategies in a growing industry."

How do you think EA will fare in the years to come? Let us know your thoughts in the forums.


Discuss in the forums Reply
Brooxy 6th May 2009, 11:44 Quote
I'm sure if they put more effort into the games they make, they would be getting more profits, and less loss *sigh*
Whalemeister 6th May 2009, 11:47 Quote
Makes the rumors of the Apple buyout all the more interesting...
yakyb 6th May 2009, 12:13 Quote
does this net loss also incorporate the companies they have bought this year?

but i agree a bit more time and care over games goes a long way
mjm25 6th May 2009, 12:38 Quote
It doesnt matter what company you are, that is a LOT of debt to have hanging over you... hopefully the cost cutting measures this year will make it look more respectable next year... but not at the expense of the quality of games. it seems whever EA gets something right it gets kicked in the teeth (Dead Space, Mirrors Edge etc)
EvilRusk 6th May 2009, 13:23 Quote
Must be all those pirates robbing the EA treasure ships off Somalia...
UrbanMarine 6th May 2009, 13:23 Quote
I don't feel sorry for EA considering they strong armed and raped (wallets, buyouts etc) their way to the top. They (past 2 CEOs) took a dump on the consumer claiming they're making/publishing master pieces. When in reality they're still making/publishing piece of crap games with a shinny box.
Tokukachi 6th May 2009, 13:48 Quote
Ea have done this to themselves, they've ruined there reputation with gamers wolrdwide, first it was just releasing plan old crap, but these day it's more to do with releasing what should be a good game, but is buggy/broken in some way and them just abandoning it instead of fixing it.
It's got to the point now that I won't buy a EA game until I know its working as it should, I always wonder why reviews gloss over game breaking bugs in games, like mirrors edge.
pizan 6th May 2009, 13:50 Quote
Originally Posted by EvilRusk
Must be all those pirates robbing the EA treasure ships off Somalia...

SMIFFYDUDE 6th May 2009, 13:56 Quote
Recession, what recession? I just bought a ROFLCOPTER!
Will EA increase quality, hoping that will entice gamers, or will they dumb down further with cheap tat franchise games? I predict the latter. The Sims 3 anyone?
The_Pope 6th May 2009, 14:04 Quote
So hang on - they had sales of $4.2 billion but it cost them $5.3 billion to produce?? Talk about accountancy fail :(
Turbotab 6th May 2009, 14:24 Quote
Originally Posted by The_Pope
So hang on - they had sales of $4.2 billion but it cost them $5.3 billion to produce?? Talk about accountancy fail :(

I always say, turnover is worthless, if you get turned over.
Sh00ter 6th May 2009, 14:34 Quote
too many people have been screwed over, too frequently, i know loads of people that just will not buy an EA game - far too many promises, that never come off.

poor ole EA.....
Mach1.9pants 6th May 2009, 14:43 Quote
I'd buy more of their games if they made them work properly in wide screen; most of their games require hacks to work properly.
D-Cyph3r 6th May 2009, 17:42 Quote
I'm in the heartless "serves them right" camp. Though my reason for hating EA is not because they continually churn out buggy/crap games, but because those games are being developed by studios who, when they were independent, were full of talent.
UrbanMarine 6th May 2009, 18:31 Quote
Westwood used to be one of my favorite companies, then EA stepped in and half the dev team quit.
Otto69 6th May 2009, 20:01 Quote
Please don't use the term "fire" when referring to layoffs. Traditionally being "fired" means you screwed up. Being "layed off" means the company screwed up.
ZERO <ibis> 6th May 2009, 20:36 Quote
Oh I know how about they put secure rom on there future games too and I will proceed to not buy or play those as well.

Also westwood was awesome, I died a little inside when they got take over.
LordPyrinc 7th May 2009, 01:53 Quote
Westwood was awesome. In some ways I almost hope the juggernaut that is currently EA fails. They is gettin too big for their britches.

Big conglomerate developers such as EA can lead to crappier games, in my opinion. Small companies will spend the extra time to put a quality product out the door because they know a good game can mean their ultimate survival or utter failure.

EA can afford to churn out crappy games for a time, but perhaps they've been doing this too much. They are reporting a loss that would make any company cringe. A company's purpose is to make money. If it continues to lose money at an increasing rate, there is something wrong.
naokaji 7th May 2009, 08:00 Quote
No real surprise.

Pretty much every game they release has turned into a annual improvement free orgy of sequels.

Then there is another issue, games are too often released full of bugs, also they don't release enough patches to fix whats broken and often those patches are late.

On top of that, they have a digital distribution system which does not work in most cases.
rhuitron 7th May 2009, 10:42 Quote
Yeah....But please, no Go and sell out to Apple.
impar 7th May 2009, 12:00 Quote

Some has to be blamed on the DRM infection.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.

Discuss in the forums