Red Alert 3 may be using SecuROM, but there are some reasons to look forward to it.
EA has announced an intention to continue using the controversial SecurROM copy protection software with the upcoming
Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3, despite the massively negative reaction the DRM software has met with in previous products.
Companies such as Take-Two and Electronic Arts have received backlash from users after including the draconian copy protection system SecuROM. The system has been used in games such as
BioShock and
Mass Effect, with
Spore currently taking a customer-review bashing on Amazon for its inclusion of the software.
EA has now confirmed that it won't be dropping the system however and will include it in
Red Alert 3, though the SecuROM system will be tweaked. Players will now be allowed five active installs of the game at any one time, the software only authenticate on first-run and you will not need the disc in the drive to play according to a
discussion on the EA forums.
"
Red Alert 3 is shaping up to be a world-class RTS game that will give you many hours of enjoyment," said an EA spokesperson.
"
I think it would be a shame if people decided to not play a great game simply because it came with DRM, but I understand that this is a very personal decision for many of you and I respect that. As you might imagine, I’m a lot less respectful of those people who take the position that they will illegally download a game simply because it has DRM,"
In other words: not good news and this is something that some people will obviously use as a flimsy excuse for piracy.
Are you one of those people, or will you be showing displeasure through sales figures? Let us know what you think in
the forums, or check out our hands on impressions of the game in our
Red Alert 3 preview.
61 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyCouldn't be more true, seriously...
The only thing DRM does is make you a little bit more concious about carefully installing/uninstalling your software (and thats a VERY good thing, for overall system health and computer awareness).
I for one have never had problems with Spore/Mass Effect/Bioshock/Windows XP activations. And why the hell do you think calling for an activation is hard work ? >_>
The man from EA is totally right, people who actually prefer NOT to buy a game due to DRM are 98% of the time just ppl who want free games and need an excuse for themselves >_>.
I will never buy a Securom game and I invite others to boycott them until EA (and other fools that use it) until they clue in.
The clowns at EA should take a trip to Stardock and learn how to treat their customers.
Yours in Anti-Corporate Plasma,
Star*Dagger
I don't think thats the true at all, I generally format my hard drive quite a bit mostly thanks to Creative drivers and SP3 updates which seem to cause me problems.
The idea of someone legally buying a game, then having to limit their installs before calling to activate it is a ridiculous idea, regardless of the ease by which it is accomplished. As mentioned before in other threads its treating genuine buyers as potential pirates and really has no advantages. pirates will torrent the game, install it and bypass activation, people that buy it will have to activate it after x amount of installs, its intrusive and useless.
It may be the case that the game remains the property of the company releasing it, but reminding people of this is just bad business practice, this is why it alienates people, its nothing to do with the random '98%' of people that want free games,
99% of people already know this
Because there's absolutely no reason why I should have to. It's intrusive, unnecessary, and smacks of selfish luddism. I've bought the license to play the game once, so why I do I have to ask permission to play it again?
Those in The Scene who want to distribute the product will get their hands on a copy before the release date, it will be leaked to P2P, and those who don't want to pay for it will be able download it with the DRM already cracked.
DRM only affects (and annoys) PAYING customers.
I personally won't touch any StarForce based products as I've had coutless issues with them in the past. The installation of device drivers to affect the operation of my optical drives is not the best way to impress me. There have been several StarForce protected games that I just couldn't play. The install went fine, but after that I couldn't actually get the game to run.
Compared to that, I think SecurROM is a fairly friendly system!
EA has lost my money on all 3 of those games they packaged with secuROM (well... maybe not Spore as reviews have been pretty lukewarm) - RA3 is now just the latest addition to that list. I'm not going to pirate it just because EA messed it up - I'll treat it as any other game that was messed up in some way (whether that had been gameplay, graphics etc) and go and find something else to entertain me, it's not like there is a shortage of choice after all...
Yes, it doesn't stop people pirating - but they would have anyway...the people who for some reason think they are entitled to something for free.
All you idiots think your waving a huge banner against some kind of injustice and I just don't see it. Its not like you've got 3 installs and that's it, you have to buy it again - and, exactly how many machines can you run a console game on concurrently? Don't hear anyone complaining about that....do you? And no, you don't have any right to put it on more than one machine......all that has changed is that the technologies now exist to enforce what has been in EULAs for a long long long time.
I just hope those of you who refuse to buy a game because of DRM eventually pull your heads out of your own behinds, start thinking about the people your really hurting (those who slave away day after day creating these games) and just pull off your campaign hats. Games are meant to be fun, and RA3 certainly will be, buy it, install it, play it and have fun - safe in the knowledge your supporting an industry that....lets face it, needs all the help it can get.
Perhaps EA thinks otherwise. Seems like that's the reason why I've been enjoying classics like Might & Magic 7 instead of Crysis or Bioshock this year :D
Until we get bored of supporting the activation servers at which point it will never, ever give anyone any enjoyment ever again.
I've no intention of playing a game with these types of drm. Note thats playing not buying, i wont pirate it and I wont buy it. There are plenty of games which i'm willing to pay for these are not amongst them so it is a genuinely lost sale unlike the percived piracy threat.
On a similar note i noticed bioshock had the activation requirement removed. Does any one know if you install a new retail copy does it still install SecurROM?
The online authentications require servers that I have no way of knowing if will be online in the future.
Limited activations are just intolerable.
Full DRM details:
Another EA game to avoid.:(
So what's the point of it then?
Given this statement, it seems they are saying that they are including DRM to annoy the people that actually did purchase the game - this annoys me.
They only removed the limited activations part. Now its unlimited. While servers last.
You say it yourself though - it won't stop piracy, (if you look at spore is was available 5 days before release with the DRM removed/cracked) so what exactly is the point of limiting installs?
edit: someone beat me to asking the question I shouldn't skim read :X
Its really strange how people react when it comes to computer related issues. If we replace "computer game" with "car" and "DRM" with "car alarm" the the scenario changes.
Ex: If you buy a brand new car its comes with an alarm, which is great so none steals it! But there is one little hitch, you can only get in and out of your car 4 times a day, after that you have to call the manufacturer. If your just using the car to and home from work its fine but what if you use the car IN work and have to get in and out 10 times per day?
Im aware that there are differences and I'm only using that example to show the principal. If you buy a game (which you absolutely should) you should be able to reinstall it as many times as you want, end of story. While their still on it why not lease the game to customers instead of selling it? Seems like that fits their model better.
Dear EA
As one of your valued customers who have supported you over the years I would strongly disagree with the choice to support DRM protection on Red Alert 3.
I do not want the to be dictated or forced into this situation or you will loose a customer in this regard. I have more than 30 EA PC games and have never pirated any EA PC games in my whole life, and quite frankly if I see DRM software on a game again I will just not purchase it at all.
The last game that I purchased with DRM was Bioshock last year October and I had so many issues with getting it to work that I still have not played it even though I paid for it.
I live in South Africa and did not have the luxury to call your oversees support line.
I will now state reasons supporting my dislike of DRM software:
1) It installs a rootkit software that could be exploited by EA or SecurRom or any other individual to gain access, or steal personal information.
2) Reinstalling he game becomes a hassle because of the 3 limit install, I for instance reloaded my PC 4 times over the last two weeks. Reasons: New motherboard and 2x raid failure. So if I installed RA3 over this period it would be voided and I have to buy a new game?
3) You are creating a complicated system to punish the honest buyers, the bloody hackers will crack it anyway the week after it launches, get in touch with reality!
4) You are asking me to basically rent the software instead of giving me ownership.
5) Why do this with successful franchises? You have already seen the good sales on these games, so there is no threat of failing. The cheap assed individual who steals will always steal and by forcing DRM you are not going to create a new sale! BE REALISTIC!
Understand this, if DRM (SecurRom) is included you WILL loose this customer, who have been a proud a owner of every single C&C franchise game through the years.
I have hosted and organized tournaments for C&C games, and have supported the franchise vigorously over the years.
Quite frankly the demise of PC gaming will be this DRM infection and not piracy!
Regards
Nico (Nictron) Fourie
I hated having to ring MS every time I reinstalled XP, I'm gonna hate it even more when I have to call some overseas support line just to play a game!
The one question I have is this:-
What benefit do EA get from adding this DRM to their game??
Bingo!
Speaking as someone who has cracked SecuROM (for educational research), it's really not that difficult to do and the reward is that of convenience. Just patching and then playing is far better than the DRM hoops EA make you jump through.
Until EA learn this, the ongoing cat and mouse game will continue which inevitably always hurts their paying customers.
From what I can tell they don't get any benefit at all. It's kinda like those anti-piracy things they put on DVDs and make you sit thru without being able to skip or fast forward before you get to the main DVD menu. All things like this do is inconvenience and/or annoy the people who've actually gone out and bought a legitimate copy of a game or movie. It's ironic that, in certain cases, it's less hassle to download a cracked version of a game and use that rather than try and make a legitimate copy, with it's oh so important DRM, work.
none but they have to try and stop piracy, maybe this method isnt particularly effective but they have to try. Hopefully some time soon, someone will come up with a better way of doing things.
Fine now.
Fine next week.
Fine for quite a while, in fact.
But how long are you content to rent your temporary licence to play this thing?
You've never tried calling Sony's software department to get an activation code for Sound Forge, have you? It was originally released by Sonic Foundry, who were then bought up by Sony; calling the latter party results in a "Huh, what? Oh, we don't support that anymore", as if I'm going to just roll over and buy a new version. So far, yelling at them a lot has worked out. I'm not sure how long that status quo will last.
hmmm don't agree with this one bit. I have several machines with different operating systems at different locations, do I have to buy a game per-machine? everyone has internet connection or can get to internet connection at some point. Why can't registration and activation of the game be performed online at installation be enough? It's my EA account (with password) it's my activation code that came with the game and if they are that worried about it they can send me an automated new activation code to my email address linked to the EA account?!?!?! I mean why should I waste my time on the phone?
By the way Spore is awesome, worth every penny, but has anyone else found it wont auto-run on Vista 64? in fact you can't even explorer the disc it just comes up with "would you like me to format your blank disc"
I had to use InfraCD to browse the CD and select the autorun.exe?!?!!?
once bitten, twice shy...
can see this happening alot, people just won't and shouldn't have to put up with this cr@p
peace
i never buy games that will not start if demon tools or other disk loading tools are on the pc (Securom is anoying on that one if the option has been turnd on as not all Securom protected games are the same some Securom games are just there to make sure the disk is in the drive, but as long as i can NoCd the game like c&c 3 T wars i buy them)
What about Crysis Warhead?
Any news regarding the DRM?
You can't fight disrespect for property with disrespect for property! That's called a war. And is EA in war with us?
If it fails to work THEN I might give a ****, but until then? Not gonna happen.
Especially considering I haven't needed to put the CD in for Spore, aside from to install it.
yeah, what about crysis warhead? i'm concerned as well, any news?
I just accomplished to install and play Crysis in Vista with the router turned off.
My Vista never had Crysis installed before and without internet connection how did Crysis activated itself?
Or, were you refering to the Crysis bought via EA Store/EA Download Manager?
Because that sure is a mess:
http://www.crymod.com/thread.php?threadid=34805
http://torrentfreak.com/spore-most-pirated-game-ever-thanks-to-drm-080913/