Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg thinks that the Wii is little more than a novelty console.
Microsoft's Aaron Greenberg still isn't a big fan of the Wii apparently and, despite the fact the diminutive console is trouncing the competition in terms of sales, thinks that the little white box is little more than a fad.
In comments made to
Gamasutra, Greenberg talked about why he thinks the future for the Wii is limited, discussing the problems Nintendo may have with customers.
"
You see they're not buying games on it, right? It's like something they break out when people come over, and it's maybe a fun thing, but it's almost like the same people that buy a karaoke machine, you know? They're not really buying it for games, they're just buying it as a novelty," said Greenberg.
According to Greenberg Microsoft and Nintendo are aiming at different audiences and with different aims, so there is less competition than you might expect. Instead, Greenberg thinks that the Xbox 360 is a great complement to the Nintendo Wii, despite it being little more than a fad, apparently..
"
In this generation we're seeing record revenues for the US and globally for the business, and we're seeing more people buying and playing games than ever before, and the Wii is definitely part of that. And as they grow that pie, that benefits us too, because those customers are eventually going to want to graduate to an Xbox 360 experience."
What do you think? Is the Wii good for parties and nothing more? Let us know in
the forums.
The only Wii game I really spent a lot of time with and actually had fun playing alone was The Godfather: Blackhand Edition. Good game.
I also am wondering if nintendo is going to continue the wii style control scheme for the next console. if they continue with that, it will get old, but if they change back to a gamepad, that would be kind of boring for them...
I'm interested in when the next Gameboy is coming...
Remember Nintendo saying that the DS WOULDN'T replace the GBA.. and that it was a 3rd pillar?
I don't think Nintendo remembers.
Yeah, the Wii appeals to a different audience than the 360. A larger one. And why? Because it's good for parties.
Ditto. Had one for months... played Zelda most of the way through though tbh I got bored with it towards the end and never ended up finishing. Brought it out at school a couple times for some team events, and that was the extent of its use. It's long-since been sold, though I wish I'd sold it for more. Oh well, I don't miss it.
I'm not so sure I'd call it a novelty, but it really doesn't lend itself well to more traditional gaming. Which is fine, so long as you know that going in.
I'm still playing the Wii, just bought Tiger Woods 2008 and I'm very impressed. Much more involved and a much bigger challenge than the Wii Sports golf (as you would expect). I would never buy a golf game on a regular console, what's the point of pressing buttons to mimic something so active?
What I don't understand is why Nintendo is standing still on so many games that traditionally would not sell well, but with the different and intuitive controller can work.
Things like - Wii cricket - the mind boggles at the possibilities of this, yet there's still no sign of a game from EA...
A port of the Rocky game from the Xbox 360, but with the Wii controls, come on Nintendo! It would be awesome.
More dedicated sports games, there are too many to mention, but this is the way to go.. get on with it!
When was the last time you played a Golf Game?
EA have been using analogue control in Tiger Woods games since TW2002 on the PS2... and It works better than the Wiimote's overly sensitive controls.
lol
True.. That is a good game, but there's not enough new to make me play through again.. Since I already finished it on the 'Cube.
I now own 10 games for the Wii, the most I ever owned for any console I had (I had almost all of them up to the PS2).
The sports games are nice for the fact that it uses the motion thingie, but when games like TW2008, which is excellent, come out, it makes even more sense to have this type of console.
I can enjoy GH3, Manhunt 2, RE4, etc. exactly as with the other boxes, although I still can't have any DLC, but that will all change with GH:WT.
Mario Kart Is another Gem IMHO, been grinding time away on that game since it came out.
So I say to each is own, and I think that Nintendo as reached a lot of casual players that would never have gone back to consoles game if it weren't for the Wii (myself included).
Yep, or with roommates, but eh.. I sold mine and got a 360.. Happy with that now, even when playing by myself
That was a joke right?
Golf is all about thumb rotation and analog sticks right....Geez..
And as far as the controls being over sensitive, like in real life in takes practice to get better.. O_o
+1
I don't want a game which simulates MY crappiness (although, I am quite good at golf naturally).. If I'm playing a game as a PRO Golfer, I want to be as good as a Pro Golfer.
The fact that most Wii players (in my experience) resort to simple wrist flicks, rather than full gestures, anyway makes your argument flawed.
It's only a realistic experience if you embrace it fully.
Hmm, it would be interesting to see stats on how many Wii's were sold a short while after they were purchased compared to to how many people got "bored" of a 360...
Yes, the 360's have the RRoD issue but for those unlucky persons (me included) I simply had it fixed free of charge. I didn't "sell" my 360 shortly after buying it, like I did my Wii when I realised it was indeed for a lower age group/party/novelty crowd and not what one would normally say are "proper gamers" (don't bother replying to that statement, Timmy, we've had this discussion before ;) )
EDIT: and for the record, I don't hate the Wii -- I merely think of it as a "casual gamer's" machine. Because it's "outselling" the 360 doesn't mean Nint are "kicking M$'s" @rse or that M$ are failing in comparison. The two machines are for two different playing groups and as such being marketed accordingly.
Sure you get less violent single player games and more colourful party games on Wii. I'm not gonna say anything that hasn't been said before. With Wii, you get different kinds of games, and at that, there is no competition. Seriously. As a party game, what is there to compete with Brawl? If Galaxy is an overrated game, then I do not know what is not. I have yet to see any developer to come up with a platformer that is even 2/3 as good.
If you only care about shooters(online/offline), RPGs, and story driven movie/game, why bother even thinking about Wii? If you bought it somehow, you bought a wrong console to begin with. Blame yourself for not doing enough research before your purchase instead of going on endless Wii-bashing.
lolz itz nt 4 serius gamrz prty gaemz suk coz i hav no frendz
Sheesh!
Andy
ok I just said that for the kicks...
What about letting go of your consoles and go out "confraternizing", socialize?
What he doesn't mention is that Ninty make money on every console, whereas MS were (are?? not sure) making a loss and Sony still are. When numbers come into it the Wii urinates on the two more 'hardcore' consoles
I've owned every Nintendo console since the SNES, currently I still own my Gamecube and Wii. I've owned almost every Gameboy, right up to the Gameboy Advance. Then there's the many, MANY games for each console that I've spent hours on end playing, dare I say days, weeks... pushing months perhaps?
What's the last Microsoft game I played? Err, Flightsim 95'? I flew from Sydney to QLD in a Cessna or something and it took 3 hours. I never, ever played the game again. Note: I've never actually pirated a single Nintendo title for any of their consoles... Nintendo and its developers have scored a few grand out of me over the years. :)
NOW, back to Guitar Hero III!!!
isn't a fad something that goes arround for a few weeks or at best a few months? :P
I'm happy enough that Nintendo churns out the type of games they do now. The rest is up to third parties. On the console arena, only three franchises matter to me anyway, Mario, Zelda, Metal Gear. The rest I can get my fix on PC.
Meh, all that aside its just a clear-cut case of different strokes for different folks. The PS3 and the 360 target a similar audience but the Wii is in a completely different niche altogether. Also, since when has "my company's product is better than my competitor's product" really turned in to news? At least Asus vs. Gigabyte had some hot lawsuit action.
Twilight Princess???
but seriously I have a PC why would I want another (louder / hotter / uglier) one under my TV...
well that is a little unfair, but in my view I will never own an xbox purely because of the online community of stoned squeeky rude kids. Can anyone that has played Halo honestly tell me they have ever had an evening of playing online without meeting a bunch of complete gits?
And I can very, very, very honestly tell you that I've had evening's of Halo without meeting a 'bunch of complete gits' (whats a git? sounds like a grit or a nit or something). It's amazing how easy it is to ignore people on Live that would get on your nerves, especially in a game like Halo where the developer realized that there's a need sometimes to shut up the "gits" where it takes all of three button presses to mute them in the pre-game lobby and maybe four button presses to mute them in game. Also you can set your profile to mute everyone who isn't your friend by default, an option takes all of two seconds to set on xbox.com.
I can completely see your point about already having a PC and not wanting an Xbox for that reason, they do have similar target markets and as a result the games that come out are usually shared/ported around but avoiding it solely based on the supposed ignorance of the online community? That's pretty weak my friend.
I beat it like 6 times on the gamecube and i still think its and awesome and diffrent game on the wii but it is still the same game i just like it because of its difficulty
yeah just like ipod, see what i did there?