It is tough to spot, but the IGN logo is visible in the bottom right.
Computer games can take an awful lot of time and effort to create - years of work for hundreds of people, so can we really begrudge someone cutting a few corners?
In the case of Capcom's Wii version of
Okami, we most certainly can - surely there has to be one person as every game developer and publisher who has the job of checking for errors on the packaging and in the manual? Apparently not.
The much-anticipated Wii port of Capcom's
Okami has been, like most ports, the subject of much scrutiny from Capcom fans who wanted to see the game faithfully re-created on the Wii - but what nobody noticed until
yesterday though was that the cover art for the game came with a IGN watermark still included!
The logo has apparently made it all the way through the games development, only being spotted after release by
NEOgaf members.
Granted, the logo is a little hard to spot as it is a case of a white logo on a white background, but it
is there and was apparently nabbed from
IGN's Okami page.
That or the wolf in question has developed a taste for games reviewer - tell us
what you think while we retreat to a safer location.
But seriously, you'd think they would have their own images of their game?!?
Yeah, exactly. :P
But what i (and lots of other people it seems) don't understand is, why on earth are they even using an image from IGN in the first place
maybe because i dont know what the IGN logo looks like anyway.
http://www.siriusaspects.ca/images/ignlogooops.jpg
The top image is the very same one Bit-Tech used in their news story (With the levels played with a touch), and underneath is a cropped screenshot (of "Grid" on the XBox 360) showing their Watermark on a much darker background.
Still makes me wonder why they are using a screen grab from a internet site