The V-tech flash game mirrors the controversial Super Columbine Massacre RPG made in 1999.
Only days after the tragic event, Ryan Lambourn had begun work on a flash game based on the Virginia Tech shootings in a strikingly distasteful move that mirrored the controversial
Super Columbine Massacre RPG.
Super Columbine Massacre RPG was previously featured as number two in a list of the
worst games of all time. The V-tech flash game has provoked similar reactions of disgust from the public, though some view the game - which is both ridiculously easy and terribly made - as incredibly brave and thought provoking.
However, following an understandably massive outcry against the game, Ryan Lambourn has become even more brazen and callous and has issued a ransom for the games removal.
The following message was posted on his
website;
"ATTENTION ANGRY PEOPLE: I will take this game down from newgrounds if the donation amount reaches $1000 US, i'll take it down from here if it reaches $2000 US, and i (sic) will apologize if it reaches $3000 US."
Obviously this has provoked a massive response also, with comments on the website including;
"If someone donates a plane ticket, i will go knock some sense into him" and other such threats.
At
bit-tech we're all for using computer games as an
artistic medium, but it seems obvious that this 'game' and the following ransom were made without artistic intention or merit and exist solely as a way for the creator to extort money from others.
What's your opinion on the game, can games be used as an art form and will you be donating to silence Ryan Lambourn? Let us know
in the forums.
his website has been taken down btw... probably a bandwidth thing.
O-ya, and the article doesnt seem to link to this thread. Might want to fix that.
You're assuming he has one.
He's obviously trying to write the rules, but that doesn't mean we have to play the game*.
-monkey
*The metephorical game, not the flash game.
leave him be and it'll all go away soon :)
EH?!
Justice is done.
if its the gf bit, i agree :p
Best... idea... evah...
but ignoring him is negating (at least one of) his intentions, thus doing nothing here isn't really nothing... it is something... :o
And dont get me wrong, but everyone that is involved into developing games wants your money nomatter what
Yes... because of course Bit-tech are clearly going to post images from the V-Tech game.
also, doom is now utterly open source, so there's pretty much nothing to steal.
but that interface is nothing like the doom interface. ...
lol!!
<borat>High Five!</borat>
As for googling CVs, it happened to me. I made a stupid Youtube Video once where I faked breaking my finger and at an interview for another journalism job they bought it up and laughed at me after checking my hand over for scars :S
And that is why I always perform in adult movies under a pseudonym
Ah ok, It just didn't look like any screenshot from Super Columbine Massacre I'd ever seen.
As for Doom being open source: yes, it's open source, but that doesn't mean it's a free game! All that's free is the engine, not the content, if you wanted to see the graphics, play the levels, hear the sounds etc. you still have to pay for them. For that matter, both Quake and Quake 2 are totally open source, but you can't stroll on to the id website and download the games for free!
Yeah But freedom of speech... Freedom to be an ass... or Just plain freedom... It sucks how some use it..
big assumpation imho
thats a hefty sentence but a derserved one none-the-less
at the end of the day hes still a prick
high chance hes used afake name
I think he deserves $3000 just for exposing how hypocritical humans can be :)
I got no problem whatsoever with what he's done, in fact, I think it shows guts on his part.
And to all those to calling for his killing, flogging, stoning STFU. We have freedom of speech and ability to express oneself as long as it does not endanger others, even if it something you absolutely disagree on.
Freedom of speech? yes. Ability to express oneself as long as it does not endager? no. Otherwise I could express my desire of pretty things by taking all the stuff from a jeweller, people could express their feelings of naturism in the citys, but somehow pesky things called laws tend to stop us. Although I do like the fact that you've started the cry for freedom of speech by telling people to STFU.
The man has done nothing wrong here, nothign illegal. He is free to do what he has done, and like I said, good on him for having the balls and the gumption to go through with this act.
What I find most interesting is the reactions to this. He's capitolizing on an act of violence, which we all claim to abhor. So what do we do? We advocate committing more violence against this guy. pot kettle black, folks
Not really. He's not creating terror by what he's doing, he's just pissing people off.