Google Instant saves, the company claims, between two and five seconds per search.
By now you've probably already noticed that there's something different about Google's search page: it's started giving you your results before you've even finished typing.
In a move that builds on the company's experience with auto-suggestions, where partial text matches would be compared to previous searches to guess what you might be searching for, Google has gone to the next level; start typing your query on the Google homepage and you'll instantly start seeing a list of results.
It's a neat idea, and one that demonstrates the power and scalability of Google's platform. We all know that Google searches untold billions of pages
incredibly quickly, but there's knowing it and there's
seeing it happen
in real time right before your eyes.
Dubbed Google Instant, and having been hinted at with a colour-changing logo over the last few days, it's a feature not without its critics. Search engine optimisation pundits, in particular, are concerned that the feature could render their entire business obsolete. Steve Rubel, of Edelman Digital, posted to his
personal blog the opinion that "
what [Google] really did [with Google Instant] is kill SEO" - a sentiment shared by many in the PR and SEO industries.
Google, for its part, is full of confidence that Google Instant will make people's lives better. Based on a saving of 2-5 seconds per search, the company claims that global use of the service could save "
more than 3.5 billion seconds a day - that's 11 hours saved every second."
For those who aren't convinced about the new functionality, there's good news: there's a link to disable Google Instant on each search page, or it can be toggled in your Preferences.
Whether Google Instant proves to be a success, or just a way for the company to show off the power and speed of its search platform remains to be seen.
Have you played with Google Instant, and if so, what's your opinion? Does it really save you time, or are you distracted by the constantly shifting results screen? Share your thoughts over
in the forums.
32 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyAnd the problem with this is???
I have little sympathy for people who make a living gaming the system
Don't you know
Googlethe world owes these people a living....? it worked on .co.uk just now.
I'm not sure I like it enough to forego the use of firefox's search bar ( and by the way it doesn't work with firefox's default homepage.
As for SEO, I've always considered it a tad on the wrong side of shady.
And messing Firefox Awesome Bar!
Good idea mind! Probably shave a few minutes off searching for stuff at work occassionally mind!
Just a knee jerk reaction to Bing me thinks.....
Over the last couple of months Ive been finding it harder to actually find what I want on google. Like looking for benchmarks on something and its not even in the right area or completely ignores keywords like the product name or in that example the word benchmark. It'll take more than a feature that saves me typing a couple of words to use google again. More like a re think of their search algorithm!
Anybody even remotely considering SEO will start with optimising for google and maybe think about other search engines later - if they can be bothered. This "gaming" of the system effectively decreases the quality of the search results and makes google suckier for us all
on the downside, i think i visited google.co.uk when they did the packman thing... then the next time was for the bouncy balls... actually, including just now that makes it twice in a week!
yeh... when it comes to the address bar, it will be handy, although i can't quite see how they're going to implement it.
Would be cool, unless you have a limited connection...
its a little hard to get used to at first as i habitually press enter after a search but i could see the benefits immediately
I understand what they're trying to do, though. And even though it doesn't work in low bandwidtch scenarios (like the majority of the country), it seems to work well on lrger lines.
You are on about black hat tactics. That's nothing to do with SEO.
For what it's worth, this is Matt Cutts' views on Google Instant and SEO:
SEO simply means making your website accessible to search engines.
The people "gaming the system" aren't SEOs. They are spammers, black hatters, and in some cases fraudsters.
SEO /= spam.
If SEO was spam, Google wouldn't happily promote SEO and give loads of free SEO tips out:
http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/www.google.com/en//webmasters/docs/search-engine-optimization-starter-guide.pdf
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35291
etc
;)
But yeah, Google Instant seems an interesting change. I think it's bad from a usability perspective (will 'typical' users who type slowly appreciate the page shifting and transforming all the time?), although I'd imagine Google would tweak things within hours if they noticed people started using other SEs. It's a very interesting idea, one that I love.
Plus good websites with good content needn't worry.
You're right that it will - thankfully - harm the black hatters though :)
Well done Google