The FASTRA II build uses six GTX295 dual-GPU cards along with a single-GPU GTX275 card to offer 12 teraflops of performance.
You may remember the teeny-tiny supercomputer that the guys over at the
University of Antwerp built using eight GPUs across four Nvidia GeForce 9800GX2 graphics cards - well, the guys have upped their game.
As reported over on
Engadget, FASTRA II features an impressive
thirteen general purpose graphics processing cores for a total performance of twelve teraflops - trillion floating-point operations per second - at a minuscule cost of just €6000 (£5,400).
The
official website explains that the rather impressive build - requiring a special cage to hold the graphics cards which are connected to the motherboard via flexible riser cables - features six Nvidia GTX295 dual-GPU graphics cards along with a GTX275 single-GPU graphics card for a total of thirteen addressable processing cores - not including the system's CPU. In order to satisfy the power demands of all that graphics hardware, FASTRA II uses four individual power supplies all snugly nestled up on a Lian-Li PC-P80 Armorsuit case.
A build as complicated as this is not, naturally, without problems: the team behind FASTRA II needed some custom BIOS code from Asus in order to use all the graphics cards together, and is "
still experiencing software stability issues, probably caused by an incompatibility between the video drivers and the BIOS and Linux modifications we had to use."
The system - which is designed for use in tomography applications - shows a major speed boost over its predecessor, managing 4.08 computer-aided tomography slice reconstructions per second compared to just 1.14 for the original FASTRA. By comparison, a system based around Intel's Core i7 940 CPU running four processing cores at 2.93GHz manages just 0.18 slice reconstructions per second.
All this power comes at a price, of course: under full load, the rig pulls a whopping 1.2KW of power, which is significantly more than the slower desktop based around the Core i7 chip at just 260W peak draw. That said, the FASTRA II system is four times as fast as the university's 512-core AMD Opteron-based cluster - built almost five years ago for supercomputer work - which draws a massive 90KW under load. Indeed, when energy efficiency - measured in slice reconstructions per Watt-hour - is measured, FASTRA II leaves every other solution standing.
If you fancy having a go at building your own supercomputer, the team has produced a list of the
hardware used in FASTRA II.
Does GPGPU represent the future of supercomputing, or is it only a matter of time before the CPU reigns supreme once again? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
31 Comments
Discuss in the forums Replycan i have it
Must show my better half this, she works in Nuclear Medicine...
Does that involve helping poorly electrons regain their spin :D
:D
I'd have thought more comment worthy was the fact that my fiancee might be interested in a custom-built PC with 7 graphics cards running Linux. Tomography attracts all sorts, I guess.
PS. She's mine, get yer own :p
Little confused by that too mate.
Putting the name aside, Its a brilliant idea and concept I must say! And as its for a good cause I hope they have had all the support they need.
Andy
to bad the video cards will only last 6 months at best as GTX295 (Single side versions) are not known for been reliable for folding and they do something cida the same type of load, 9800GX2 cards far more reliable and only 25% less power full (GTX295 is like having 3 9800 video cards) 9800GX2 cards tend to be more stable as well (had mine for year now all still going)
ASTRA is the research group that designed and then built the FASTRA II machine.
+1
You know who to call, when you need a machine to crack your forgotten admin password!
BUT come on! Look at that tiny screen :P
wts networking then they wouldnt even need that lol
it's running linux, we all know using a screen or a GUI on linux is for wimps :D
you beat me too it >:(
But the supercomputing chaps mostly care about double precision performance, and in that role the GTX 295 only achieves 149 GFLOPS, hence the need for Fermi. Also certain tasks run really poorly on a GPU, compared to a CPU.