The vulnerability in the Windows Presentation Foundation plugin opens Firefox up to attack - and has been centrally blocked.
The Mozilla Foundation took the controversial step this weekend of blocking certain Microsoft plugins - at least one of which contains an exploitable vulnerability - from installing and executing in its Firefox web browser.
As reported over on
PC Magazine, the Foundation has chosen to prevent Microsoft's Windows Presentation Foundation plugin from operating within the Firefox browser after Microsoft announced vulnerability MS09-054 in the plugin - a vulnerability which opens up an exploitable hole in the browser.
Perhaps the biggest issue - and the reason why the Foundation has chosen to block the plugin outright - is that, in common with the .Net Framework Assistant add-on - it installs in Firefox automatically as part of the .Net Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 update, with no user interaction or warning. Uninstalling the plugin or add-on is also somewhat difficult.
This sneaky behaviour may have contributed to the choice to block not only the vulnerable Windows Presentation Foundation plugin, but also the .Net Framework Assistant add-on - a move which has now been reversed with confirmation that the Framework Assistant add-on is not vulnerable.
However, the blocking of the Windows Presentation Foundation plugin remains in effect - causing at least one Microsoft employee to post the warning that "
when business users can't use their core business functionality - they uninstall stuff [like Firefox]" to Twitter.
Perhaps the biggest issue with Firefox using its central blacklisting feature against such a large company's software is that, according to vice president of engineering Mike Shaver, the Foundation is unable to distinguish "
patched from unpatched, so we're blocking it [the plugin] while we sort that out."
Since then Shaver has
posted that work continues on allowing corporate users - or those on Firefox 3.5, at least - the option of overriding the block as the Foundation "
[works] to keep our users safe and comfortable with all the tools at our disposal."
Are you pleased to see that the Foundation takes the safety of its users seriously enough to risk the ire of Microsoft, or was it a bad call to block such a major plugin - despite the risk? Should Microsoft get its sweaty mitts off your Firefox browser and stop installing plugins and add-ons without your permission? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
I trust Mozilla as a future. I don't trust IE.
I wonder if MS relaizes how close they are to being forced by the EU to do A LOT of things with MS win code that they would never do on their own.
This is just the opening the EU wants, so keep up the good work MS!!
Yours in MS Win gone by 2020,
Star*Dagger
i just installed firefox and mine is not blocked (mine is 1.1 net plugin windows 7) press the find update button and then restart firefox once it says there is no update mite turn it back on (you can then disable the plugin if you want it off as it will turn back on)
This is just another reason for businesses to remove vulnerable third party products from their networks and stick with the work horse trusted Microsoft. The ONLY player in the corporate world!
The vulnerability lies in a plugin that MS created. So I fail to see your point.
As long as IE has ActiveX, I will NEVER use it as my main browser. ActiveX is one great big vulnerability.
This topic was about the alledged vulnerability in the plugin for firefox. Simple solution DON'T USE FIREFOX
Firefox on my Ubuntu installs is completely unaffected by this vulnerability. Funny that.
:|
IE is possibly the Worst. Browser. Ever.
Your sweeping comment about ubuntu is also unwarranted. Why would it be completely useless?
The sweeping statement about Windows is just as bad.
Why don't we get some rationale here and not just an entire OS based on one application?
You trolls mess your systems up with all that crap from Mozilla, Google, Opera blah, blah, blah. I happily use Windows 7 Ultimate with IE8, Bing, Windows Live Messenger, Microsoft Office, Windows Media Player and I have no need whatsoever to use any other crappy glitchy adware program that everyone else climbs over themselves to shout "But mine is bigger than yours"
Just wait and you will hear a few shout it next.
It's called choice ladies and just because you use it, it doesn't mean it's the best or better than what I use for what I want to use it for.
proprietary sucks.. course to the end user- the bonus of running IE is he gets to see everything, as sites badly written just for IE will be displayed correctly :D doesn't mean it's any better.. just means the web guy sucks
far as exploits, firefox is open source