The next release of Microsoft Office - version 14 - will be made available in a native 64-bit edition, according to a beta tester.
Anyone who has made the move to a 64-bit operating system will know of the lack of true 64-bit applications to match – but should take heart in the fact that the next version of Office is likely to come in a 64-bit native edition.
According to the guys over at
Neowin, beta tester Ed Bott has done some snooping in the Office 14 closed beta code and found references to both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Office applications.
Within the
migwiz.xml file, Bott found that each application within the Office suite were listed twice: once as the standard product name, and once again with a “
_x64” suffix. This appears to indicate that fully native 64-bit builds of Access, Excel, OneNote, Outlook, PowerPoint, Project, Publisher, Visio, and Word exist – and should be shipped as an option when Office 14 goes live.
While there's little to benefit an office suite from the switch to 64-bit – unless you're working on some
really big Access databases – the move comes as the majority of PC users make the transition to 64-bit hardware. With both Intel and AMD having shipped 64-bit processors as standard for several generations, software has been slow to catch up to the capabilities. So long as 32-bit applications are the norm, there is no reason to run a 64-bit operating system – despite Windows XP and Windows Vista both being available in 64-bit editions at no extra cost. If Office 14 ships as a 64-bit native package, it will encourage more OEMs to ship a 64-bit Windows build – and encourage more software developers to take advantage of the increased memory space on offer and start developing their own 64-bit applications too.
So far there has been no official word from Microsoft on whether Office 14 will be available – like Windows – in separate 64-bit and 32-bit releases, but the clues Bott unearthed in the XML file certainly seem to pint to a dual-format launch.
Would 64-bit Office tempt you into upgrading your version of Windows, or can't you see a need for a 64-bit OS yet? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
its like 64-bit paint! ROFL!!!
this is fantastic, i want everything to be in 64bit!
My mistake :)
Wouldn't hurt Access either, we have a product for which the back end is stored in three access dbs as it is too big for one. There are a myriad reasons not least becuase not all our clients have access to the web and the ones that do wouldn't necessarily trust any one with their data over the internet (oil industry is slightly paranoid).
I currently run XP32, and it's more than enough for now. But I do have Ubuntu64 in VMWare, so I'll be prepared for a smooth transition. (From Win to Ubuntu, and not from Office12 to Office14!)
(yep, I have to look after an old and cruft Access db at work).
I'd happily move everything over to x64, except half the applications we use aren't available on x64, hell, they only became Vista compatible 6 moths ago.
10am and they're already thinking about the pub!
I'm still not sure about 64bit, its a great idea, just often poorly executed. Give it a few more years and hopefully widespread support/better backwards compatibility will iron these out.
I hope this pushes OEMs towards providing 64-bit OSs, as the state at the moment is really disappointing (though that may only be here in Australia?). Was looking at laptops a couple of months ago, and not a single OEM would provide a 64-bit OS (Linux or Windows) with a machine, even if it did have more than 3GB of RAM. F'king ripoff, especially when some of the high-end Dell laptops can have 6 or 8GB of RAM!
64-bit is not all about accessing more memory though
I would want to see a move over to the new platform sooner rather than later. Easier to just focus on one platform than having to constantly make two versions of every god damn software on earth. And also deal with ignorant developers and publishing houses who just sees 64 bit as "unnecessary, costly and time consuming". If you just dropped 32 bit dead today, there would be no added cost nor would it be more time consuming. Microsoft should have made Windows 7 a 64 bit only operating system. Of course people would have bitched, but then after a year everything would be golden again. Also who the hell runs 4Gig on their system today and still uses 32 bit OS? Madness.