bit-tech.net

BBC Trust finally approves Freesat

BBC Trust finally approves Freesat

The BBC Trust finally approved digital TV for the 25% of the UK who can't get Freeview.

When the UK established rules to move all terrestrial television broadcasts to digital, there was one small glitch -- about 25% of the country is unable to receive digital broadcasts over the "Freeview" program due to poor reception quality. Of course, there has always been the solution of just getting satellite, but as anyone can tell you, Sky is far from free.

To solve this, the BBC and ITV proposed a "Freesat" initiative, meant to help that 25% receive signals as things change over from analogue to digital. Like Freeview, Freesat only requires the one purchase of equipment (in this case a dish and set-top box) with no further subscription. It has the added benefit of a high bandwidth over Freeview, which may also allow HD content in the future.

Freesat was proposed in September 2005. So why are we hearing about it now? Because the BBC Trust has finally approved it, over a year and a half later. Warp speed, capt'n! And now that it's approved, the BBC can finally start working on implementing it. At this speed, by the time the changeover happens in 2012, it may even be working.

The new service comes with some stipulations imposed by the trust, including that ITV will not receive license fees from the BBC's normal funds (thus preventing an increase in license costs on the general population), and that the Beeb will maintain tight control over the content. That way, there is no doubt that the service is continuing its public benefits despite being "managed" by a private company.

Free satellite is actually not a totally new concept, as Sky has had the service for a while beforehand to provide similar benefits (digital channels). However, that service comes with the caveat that you are essentially signing a right to be harassed -- you must accept mailers and calls on a nearly weekly basis asking if you'd like to switch to the subscription services. Needless to say, the BBC's version will be a nice choice for people who'd rather not talk to a sales person once a week during dinner.

Do you have a thought on the new Freesat service? Tell us about it in our forums.

11 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
DougEdey 30th April 2007, 10:42 Quote
Mmmm, sexeh.

But there's no prices on the hardware yet or even estimates.

Will current free to air satellite boxes work or not?
p3n 30th April 2007, 10:45 Quote
ah back when spooks was good :<
Atomic 30th April 2007, 10:45 Quote
What an old spooks picture!
airchie 30th April 2007, 11:08 Quote
So you get the benefits of high-bandwidth sattelite freeview and all the free-to-air channels?

Noice. :)
lanester 30th April 2007, 17:47 Quote
I dunno why DVB is so great. It's mainly to free up the airwaves for more licensing money in my opinion.

Everyone who I've spoke to says reception is poor, and i stuggle to get a good picture, at least with good old analogue, you may get a fuzzy picture and sound. But if a digital signal degrades you get a unwatchable, unlistenable mess. I only live 2miles away from the antenna

Hopefully though the satellite service could sort this current mess out.

Rant over
Flibblebot 30th April 2007, 18:36 Quote
I didn't realise the figure was as high as 25% of the country not being able to get a decent signal. I would have put it much lower, mainly those living in remote rural locations, such as the Scottish Highlands and islands.

I wouldn't have included Suffolk as one of those areas - if you're having trouble getting a decent signal when you're only 2 miles from the transmitter, I'd take a look at your aerial.


In related news, the BBC Trust also gave to go-ahead for an internet-based on-demand video service. License payers will be able to get programmes for free for up to 7 days after the broadcast date, non-license payers (read: Johnny Foreigner) will have to wait, and will also have to pay to watch programmes.
Atomic 1st May 2007, 08:47 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by lanester
Everyone who I've spoke to says reception is poor, and i stuggle to get a good picture, at least with good old analogue, you may get a fuzzy picture and sound. But if a digital signal degrades you get a unwatchable, unlistenable mess. I only live 2miles away from the antenna
Where are you in Suffolk? All my mates from there have fine signal... Norfolk/Suffolk tends to have great reception because its so flat here!

I'm more than 2miles from the broadcasting mast and I get perfect 85% strength signal. Maybe you just have a old/broken aerial?
lanester 1st May 2007, 14:12 Quote
Well more than likely true. I'll have to check my aerial out. I just don't see what's so great about digital that's all.
Atomic 1st May 2007, 14:23 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by lanester
Well more than likely true. I'll have to check my aerial out. I just don't see what's so great about digital that's all.
I would bet its your aerial unless you live in a big dip or surrounded by lots of tall buildings.

The fuss:

normal tv: 5 channels (if you can count a fuzzy channel 5)
digital tv: more than 30 channels + intereactive tv + digital radio stations
lanester 1st May 2007, 23:01 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic
I would bet its your aerial unless you live in a big dip or surrounded by lots of tall buildings.

The fuss:

normal tv: 5 channels (if you can count a fuzzy channel 5)
digital tv: more than 30 channels + intereactive tv + digital radio stations

Still only 5 channels worth watching!
Atomic 2nd May 2007, 09:40 Quote
Depends what type of programs you like... I think e4 & bbc three are great and more4 has some interesting stuff on sometimes.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums