bit-tech.net

Digimark creates "active" watermark

Digimark creates "active" watermark

Digimark's latest patent would actively scan your site for watermarked images and notify their owners.

Ars Technica has proposed an interesting theory - what if content flowed freely with no DRM, but you were automatically billed for each use? Though such a world may be a bit far-fetched, the automatic content system isn't. Digimark has recently patented an active scanning technology to detect watermarks.

For those unfamiliar with the technology, a watermark is an embedded (often invisible) bit of code or imagery that either authenticates or shows ownership of a particular piece of content. Digimark is one of the two leading companies in the field, and is incredibly popular with photographers. Macrovision is the other company, and is very popular when watermarking movies or video.

The new system will troll through the depths of the internet, looking for images that are marked with a particular watermark. The service makes note of the location and sends a notice to the content's copyright holder that his or her content is up on display. The owner may then approve the use of it or get in touch with the person who has infringed on the copyright.

This "active" system is far from a new concept, but it took until the YouTube and MySpace copyright debacles before the US Patent and Trademark Office would approve it. Digimark says that its goal is not to prevent the content from being displayed, but instead compensate the owner with ad revenue for each viewing instance. Such a model could eventually allow the completely free flow of copyrighted content, just that viewers would pay for that privelage by the content sharing real estate with advertisements.

Bruce Davis, the CEO of Digimark, had this to say:
"Much of the repurposed content on YouTube, for example, contains copyrighted entertainment. If social networking sites implemented software to check each stream, they could identify copyrighted subject matter, create a report, negotiate compensation for the value chain and sell targeted advertising for related goods and services. There is no need to impede consumers. In fact, the specific identification of the content could guide provision of related goods, services and community designed to maximize the consumer’s enjoyment of the entertainment experience."

Do you have a thought on the new concept? Let us know about it in our forums.

7 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
David_Fitzy 1st March 2007, 11:09 Quote
AT last a sensible suggestion
Dr. Strangelove 1st March 2007, 12:27 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by David_Fitzy
AT last a sensible suggestion
This idea is so sensible that I'm sure Hollywood will burn it, stomp on it and spread the ashes to the four corners of the world, god forbid good ideas if they are connected to their profits. I'm sure they can find something wrong with it... :(
Zut 1st March 2007, 12:53 Quote
This still doesn't do it for me. They have the technology, and they've shown that they can get the laws made, so why don't they go after the REAL pirates?

In many ways physical media is superior to DRM protected digital media (and media that would have this pay-per-use crap), since you can lend it to friends, play it on any device (that will take it), watch it as often as you like. We ought to be free to do what we want, once we've bought the damn thing.

The line between personal use and piracy may not be 100% clear, but if the big companies want to go on some kind of pseudo lost sales value, then its the big pirates that they should go after and leave us alone.
sinizterguy 1st March 2007, 13:10 Quote
This makes sense as far as its explained in the article.
Phil Rhodes 1st March 2007, 16:51 Quote
I'm not sure it's even necessary to have the watermarking technology for this to work. The reason people like this is that it's fair and reasonable - the reason current DRM (and this is still DRM, folks) is unpopular is that it's arrogant and unilateral.

Come up with a fair system and it will do well. Try to screw us, and...
randosome 1st March 2007, 19:12 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove
This idea is so sensible that I'm sure Hollywood will burn it, stomp on it and spread the ashes to the four corners of the world, god forbid good ideas if they are connected to their profits. I'm sure they can find something wrong with it... :(
how long until the RIAA set up an automated system to scan watermarks, get your IP, find your location and send the Legal papers to you in the post - all in a matter of seconds with no user interaction - Awesome
zhangmaster12 2nd March 2007, 01:45 Quote
thats a cute cat
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums