If you have no friends who care enough to invite you to GMail, well...now you don't need them.
Google's GMail has been a great service to many of us. In case you've been living under a rock since 2004, the free email service offers over 2.5Gb of storage and a wealth of actually useful online features. For many of you, I'm preaching to the choir - but for those of you who don't have a single friend in the world, you may still be out in the cold. Well,
antisocials rejoice - GMail no longer requires an invite.
Apparently, the "Invite a friend" service disappeared sometime earlier this month, but most of us are just now catching up on it and saying "Ooh, yeah, that IS missing!" You can now register for an address directly on the main login page, meaning anyone and his brother could now get a 2.5Gb GMail account.
The move illustrates a raised confidence by Google to be able to supply the storage demands that it wants to provide. This has always been a big reason for the invite system, but it appears to be fixed now. What isn't detailed is whether this new open-enrollment system will begin bringing more spam to and from GMail accounts. The invite only allowed you to bring ten friends to the party, so now signing up tonnes of bogus email addresses could be possible. So will finding which ones are already taken.
Is it nice to lose the velvet rope at GMail? Or is there a bit of a potential to let the real riff-raff in inadvertantly now? Tell us your thoughts
in our forums.
94 left apparently.
I don't really know if this is big news or not.
Maybe it'll allow more spamers or something, but the 'invite' system and the ubiquitous 'Beta' that Google uses for everything should both be dropped.
No matter what improvements there can be made, it is still pretty much a finished product.
Now we just need to see if the number of Gmail accounts actually goes up appreciably.
Gmail boxes are 2.8GB by the way, not 2.5GB :)
I already have about 3-4 gmail accounts linked together so i can send and recieve from all of them. Its a great service, and im glad tosee it going public (if it is).
And quack, its 2.817GB (and constantly growing) :)
although i do have like 98 invites left, so really i could make 98 spam accounts ....
-monkey
2.8GB email box? Far as i know, all ISP mail boxes are 10-100Mb
But I guess it is the same with all public webmail client providers (probably all ISP's), I only really use the webmail on our exchange server at work and steer clear of the public ones unless I absolutely have to, am I really missing that much?
<A88>
I am a huge fan of gmail. I only use it for POP downloading (IMAP would be nice!), but I've grown to love how it still keeps a copy in the 'all messages' folder after its downloaded so I can still access my downloaded messages from another computer, not to mention search them.
For what it's worth, the second most basic AT&T DSL internet account offers 11 e-mail addresses, each with 2GB storage. That's the ISP I use and in the 2+ years I've had the account, I've only received 2 spam messages.
-monkey
However, i use outlook so the emails are stored on my computer anyway, and i don't really know how you could even use 1gb of space (let alone 2.8) unless you were constantly sending large files around and not deleting them
Also it seems most email providers still limit you to like 10mb max size for attachments
Not quite. My friend did a test with this cos he has an @googlemail account and it still works if you type @gmail.com when sending email to him