bit-tech.net

Universal sues MySpace

Universal sues MySpace

"If you give a mouse a cookie" - Hot off the Zune deal, Universal wants more...and sues MySpace.

It was only a fortnight ago that we were discussing the deal between Microsoft and production house Universal Music over Zune hardware sales. Well, in typical RIAA form, Universal has put that money right back into the American economy - by filing suit against someone. This time, it's the ever-popular MySpace standing at the defense table.

The announcement came literally hours after MySpace made a press release regarding a new copyright protection campaign. The new update to the site would make its users more aware of copyright violation, and make it easier to remove offending material. The tools were designed partly for the copyright owners directly, so that they could easily report any infractions.

Of course, Universal is sueing MySpace for its past stance on copyright, which was that it is expressly forbidden to post copyrighted content, but up to the user to actually do. To pad damages further, the company says that MySpace not only condoned but facilitated piracy, because the site forced users to convert video and music into a standard format before uploading.

Universal Music expects that each violation should be worth around $150,000 USD.

So there you have it. Give an RIAA member a little money, and they'll go sue someone. At least it's not a dead guy's heirs this time. Got a thought on the suit? Tell us about it in our forums.

22 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
DougEdey 20th November 2006, 16:25 Quote
$150,000?

Next question: How did they work that out?
kenco_uk 20th November 2006, 16:31 Quote
Easier to remove offending content?

So we can see the back of the whining emo kid/goth wannabe myspaces then - sounds good to me.
rupbert 20th November 2006, 16:31 Quote
I was going to post a long rant with a distinct choice of words, however it's not going to change anything so:

So long MySpace :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenco_uk
Easier to remove offending content?
There won't be much content left if that happens.

I don't understand why they are not taking the same approach as with YouTube, instead of killing the service with one large hammer fist, could they not implement some sort of content checking functionality?

Of course, this is assuming they just don't want to kill off any existing models that may interfere with the Zune to be released Marketplace? ;)

rupbert
alastor 20th November 2006, 16:31 Quote
Typical

:(
TheSaladMan 20th November 2006, 16:56 Quote
I would like to welcome my fellow Bit-Tech users to last week!
will. 20th November 2006, 17:02 Quote
oh what a witty remark! Have yourself a beer and pat yourself on the back. I think you should be the one that welcomes everyone that watches TV (instead of reading RSS feeds on their mijiggymiblob 3000) to one month-or-more ago.

asside from that... I don't like myspace, however, I would hate for it to be shut down, that would cause a sudden rush of internet dependant ingrates to suddenly flood the entire internet with pictures of their nipples... Rather than just myspace.
Veles 20th November 2006, 17:25 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by will.
(instead of reading RSS feeds on their mijiggymiblob 3000)

That would be the vroominator 3000

One of the reasons I avoid myspace like the plague is how everyones myspace...space has 3 music and video streams going all at one. So whenever you open a new page you get bombarded with sound.

If it gets rid of this, or even myspace itself, then I won't be missing anything at all.
Buzzons 20th November 2006, 17:28 Quote
you
cant
remove

MySpace


what would all the Emo's do??? its nice to keep them all in one place, it keeps them away from the rest of us :S -- dang! ;p
Bindibadgi 20th November 2006, 17:31 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSaladMan
I would like to welcome my fellow Bit-Tech users to last week!

Or, actually, two days ago according to Digg. Either way it's been the WEEKEND and some of us actually do other things in that time. If you heard it before that then good for you but no need for the snarkyness
overdosedelusion 20th November 2006, 17:55 Quote
oh no :O my girlfriend will be so disheartened that she can't post pictures of herself all over a web page at those stupid "camera in the ceiling" angles..

but seriously, the RIAA is just after more money to improve their own lives whilst destroying other peoples. i dunno how "Tom" is gonna pay for this or even if he is..

how much content exactly is there on myspace O,o.. jesus, theyre truely screwed
will. 20th November 2006, 20:28 Quote
Um, you do realise that tom did not invent myspace, he was merely the human face that they used to distract people from the fact that myspace is one big advert. I believe that myspace was in fact set up by a company formerly famous for spam and spywear.
eddtox 20th November 2006, 20:59 Quote
Greedy scum... My advice? Pirate more and DO NOT BUY THEIR SHT!

-ed out
mikeuk2004 20th November 2006, 21:53 Quote
Yay, I think they should burn it down.
Lazarus Dark 20th November 2006, 22:23 Quote
hmmm... hollywood sues a user generated content site... slow news day? (i kid)

Everyone knows these lawsuits are just greedy attempts to steal money. The fact is the internet, or even a single site as large as myspace, is impossible to police. no site of such size should be expected to be aware of a million pages that get changed ten thousand times a day, theres not enough manpower available to monitor every change to every webpage immediately as they are changed. If copyright is being infringed, the copyright holder should contact the site and ask it to be removed. if it is not removed then they should ask for an injunction or whatever to have the site shut down. but all this asking 150,000 per violation is stupid and it should be thrown out of court and they should be fined for wasting the courts time on frivolous lawsuits.

btw, in most all cases where no profit is made, I have trouble with mpaa/riaa/whoever saying money is owed them for copyright infringement. If they had their way, we would all pay for everysingle time we even remembered a song, much less actually played it on our computer. If I'm not selling pirated material for profit there are few circumstances where I think any legal action should be taken. something like a myspace page is more like an advertisement displaying someones personality and some copyright material may be necessary in order to convey a persons thoughts or feelings. Kind of like those collages they had us do in school where they required kids to use copyright images from magazines to convey something.
Charles1 20th November 2006, 23:28 Quote
I second that! Keep emo kids in one spot last thing I need them doing is flooding south coast plaza or Fashion Island with their ugly napy looks LOL. Will see what happens to myspace. But I do have to say if it reduces the videos I see when I see my friends it be good.
Bindibadgi 21st November 2006, 01:02 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddtox
Greedy scum... My advice? Pirate more and DO NOT BUY THEIR SHT!

-ed out

No, just use other means to support your bands:

DONT buy online music, buy CDs/DVDs.
Go to gigs and buy merchandise.
overdosedelusion 21st November 2006, 10:05 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Dark
If they had their way, we would all pay for everysingle time we even remembered a song, much less actually played it on our computer.

reminds me of the somewhat forgotten employment of the "if what you play on your instrument is recognisable, you owe us" policy that MPA implemented in public areas. I'ts as though they're trying to completely dry the world out of all that is fun and creative. And turning music from an art form into a buisness opportunity where millions can be had at the expense of people who appreciate music. If i want to play some pink floyd on my guitar, it shouldnt be my head on a plate.. not that i can get any tabs anymore :(

suppose i farted to the rhythm of a Metallica song, would i be in debt
Quote:
Originally Posted by will.
Um, you do realise that tom did not invent myspace, he was merely the human face that they used to distract people from the fact that myspace is one big advert. I believe that myspace was in fact set up by a company formerly famous for spam and spywear.

actually i hadnt . but this is probably due to actually visiting that site about 5 times in my life (and only to check out bands) and assumed it was similar to a profile site i used to use "facewhore" recently dubbed "profilenation" which was payed for and run by one man. So heh, learn something new each day i guess :D even if it does sound like a master conspiracy plan
DougEdey 21st November 2006, 10:14 Quote
If people listened to TWiT this week, they will know that there is a store in the US which when you buy a disc will upload the contents to your IPOD and send you the Disc and the iPod.

They are now being sued.
eddtox 21st November 2006, 16:36 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougEdey
If people listened to TWiT this week, they will know that there is a store in the US which when you buy a disc will upload the contents to your IPOD and send you the Disc and the iPod.

They are now being sued.

Am I the only one not surprised by this? I think I am going to patent breathing so that everybody has to pay me royalties for living!

-ed out
rupbert 21st November 2006, 16:42 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougEdey
If people listened to TWiT this week, they will know that there is a store in the US which when you buy a disc will upload the contents to your IPOD and send you the Disc and the iPod.

They are now being sued.

What's illegal about that? Is it because the store will have a copy remaining on the machine they ripped the disc on?

:?

*Great podcast btw
DXR_13KE 21st November 2006, 18:01 Quote
this is all about money and RIAA's big hungry monster belly.
Darkangel 22nd November 2006, 15:07 Quote
How I see it is if your rich you can go to a high street shop and buy a cd you want.... im poor and therefor bought but first cd off amazon only a couple of days ago (im 21yrs old) the rest I listen to from other kind ppl on this internet thing. Music is only sound and I cant get it into my head why I should pay such large amounts of money for it.
I'll buy theyre merch and Ill pay to see them play live... but something that theyve recorded and sold... then personaly I think what they sold for money isnt theres anymore.. If someone shares it with the world using their computer then they should be proud, not money grabbing. Think of the bands that have become successful thru online distribution - NO - think of every band out there.. I havnt got the money to buy all their material so why should I be denied their music?

Thats just my weird take on things
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums