Perhaps the audio auto-censor technology was developed by Bill after one too many Ballmer outbursts?
If you like your video streams to turn the air blue, you might want to avoid content from Microsoft in the future: the company has received a patent on technology designed to automatically censor words from an audio stream.
According to
Ars Technica, the company has been granted the patent by the US Patents and Trademarks Office and is now free to implement the
system – which uses a predefined blacklist of banned words and a real-time monitoring system which can immediately react and censor the offending word – in its existing products as well as apply it to future technologies.
While it's unlikely we'll see the technology featured as an Xbox Live plugin – although perhaps that's not such a bad idea given some of the people I seem to end up playing
Halo 3 with – the tool would have applications in video and audio streaming services that offer user-generated content over which the site has little or no control. Perhaps in the future YouTube will have an automatic beep machine that enables the easily offended to browse its contents without fear of profanity emanating forth from their sound system. The system could also see use in live TV broadcasting, where employees are often used to hit a literal big red button when profanity is used and the 'live' content is delayed by several seconds to allow them time to react.
The technology could also have a darker side, of course. While the patent talks about using the system to prevent the dissemination of profanity, there would be nothing to stop other words from being entered into the blacklist – or even entire sentences. As the technology works for both pre-recorded and live audio streams, it even opens the gate to a world where our telephone conversations can be monitored and censored in real-time.
Can you see real-world applications for this technology that
don't have you reaching for your tinfoil hat and disused bomb shelter in the mountains? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
13 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyThis sort of technology was bound to arrive eventually regardless of who developed it, concerns about privacy and censorship are valid but at least in the "free world" we shouldn't have to worry much about that. For a while at any rate. I wouldn't put it past China though.
aslong as it censored abusive language as opposed to just the odd f word here and there that youd natuarly use in conversation or frustration. Which im sure it would.
it might help raise peoples perceptions of live. thats if its even intended to ever hit live
:D
I agree, if I can turn it on/off at will, then I'm down with it
Seriously though this could be a good idea in principle but it will cetainly end up censoring far more than you would really want. I'd hate to have to give Vista my Administrator's permission to play every profanity in every song I listen to. I agree with others who say it would be fine so long as there is an on/off switch but since when has microsoft given its users any options?
I agree that this is a step in the wrong direction, but I think there is no way Microsoft could get away initially with making this sort of feature mandatory. It will probably be like UAC, Automatic Updates, Windows Firewall, etc... that not everyone needs or wants on, but they include by default with a turn-off switch. I wouldn't buy any product with this being on all the time with no off-switch, but as long as I always have a turn-off option it doesn't really bother me, just like UAC in Vista.