|
|
Airlines introduce pron filter to WiFi
Author: Gareth HalfacreePublished: 14th October 2008
It's not just Skype that's getting the boot: American Airlines has announced plans to block porn from its in-flight WiFi service.
It was always the case that in-flight voice over IP (VoIP) services such as Skype would be blocked – if only because they would negatively impact the revenue gained from the extremely expensive in-flight 'phones most airlines offer – but according to news over on the Wired blog the airlines are planning to block pornographic content, too.
The first airline to officially implement filtering specifically to counter the apparent epidemic of porn-perusing passengers is American Airlines, which has stated it is to “implement technology to filter pornographic content over it's [sic] Gogo in-flight Internet service.” It is thought that the decision has come about, at least in part, due to objections from cabin crew who didn't wish to have to act as the in-flight morality police should someone start getting their daily dose of grot at 30,000 feet.
Indeed, Corey Caldwell of the Association of Flight Attendants has said that members of his group are “on board to provide security and safety for passengers, not to monitor their Internet usage. We're glad the airlines have responded to our concerns and to those of passengers.”
One particular incident that is being used to justify the requirement for blocking occurred in March of this year when a woman from Texas filed suit against American Airlines after the company failed to prevent a man from moving into a seat next to her whilst she slept and began “staring at her as he masturbated.” While obviously distressing – and an example of the fact that some people really do have no working sense of shame – it's worth mentioning that Internet pornography was in no way involved in the case: indeed, the incident would have happened regardless of whether in-flight WiFi was offered or not.
In the end, it's all about the scope: so long as the blocking only goes after the true pornography sites, I can't see too many complaints – after all, who wants to look at that sort of thing while surrounded by strangers and with absolutely no privacy? Should the blocking extend to other realms, however – such as, of the top of my head, airline complaint sites, competing carriers flight information, YouTube, torrent sites, or simply websites with Arabic text? – then I think some serious questions need to be raised about how much control an ISP has over the Internet feed it provides its customers, no matter how transitory.
Are you pleased that your delicate sensibilities are being protected in-flight, or should airlines offer an unmodified Internet feed or else not bother in the first place? Share your thoughts over in the forums.
Related
Comments (15)- Site Links:
- About
- Email Editor
- Newsletter
- Privacy
- RSS
- Score Guide
- Our Other Websites:
- Auto Express
- Channel Pro
- Computer Buyer
- Computer Shopper
- Den of Geek
All content © bit-tech.net 2000-2010
© Copyright Dennis Publishing Limited licensed by Felden
Don't they have Air Marshals to deal with this sort of stuff?
British Airways removed the scene with Richard Branson and all Virgin Airlines advertising from the the inflight version of Casino Royale. If they do it with movies they will do it with internet.
I see much more problems with blocking Skype to be honost. But even then, it's their fking plane, they are allowed to offer whatever service they would like to offer.
On a sidenote:
*cough*
Sounds like this guy needs the hot-coffee mod: boiling water dumped in his crotch :)
I would never even have thought ppl would do such things..