bit-tech.net

Windows 7 removes e-mail, photo tools

Windows 7 removes e-mail, photo tools

Windows 7 won't include the Windows Mail, Windows Photo Gallery, or Windows Movie Maker packages from previous versions.

If you despair of the amount of cruft that comes bundled with Windows these days, and would much rather choose your own e-mail and photo editing packages, rejoice: the news is that Windows 7 will be bereft of such extras.

According to an article over on CNet, Microsoft is planning to drop the Windows Photo Gallery, Windows Mail, and Windows Movie Maker extras – last seen in Vista – from its default OS install. Instead, users who want the packages will have to make do with the cloud-based Windows Live versions instead, and even that will only be made available as an optional – free, gladly – download.

The general manager of Windows Live at Microsoft, Brian Hall, told CNet that the aim was to make the system “much cleaner”, and to improve the speed at which the company is able to roll out new operating system releases.

It also, handily, pushes users towards the Windows Live versions of said apps: it's clearly no accident that as Microsoft invests heavily in cloud-based computing and rolls out Windows Live Photo Gallery, Windows Live Mail, and Windows Live Movie Maker the old, 'dead' versions of said applications vanish from Windows. According to Hall, this is to remove the requirement to support two separate versions of programs that perform the same function – which certainly sounds like a good idea from the perspective of bugfixes and security updates.

Speaking as a relative tech-head who chooses his own mail client and photo editor, I applaud Microsoft's decision to pare down the operating system – but I can't help but feel that there may well be some confused users in Windows 7's future, especially if they're upgrading from a prior version.

Do you like the fact that Windows XP and Vista provided you with commonly needed tools straight out of the box, or will you feel happier when your OS is just an OS? Share your thoughts over in the forums.

41 Comments

Discuss in the forums Reply
Paradigm Shifter 24th September 2008, 10:42 Quote
I like the XP 'Windows Picture and Fax Viewer' for a quick look at a picture, but prefer my own applications for e-mail and editing of any type.
Shielder 24th September 2008, 11:01 Quote
How much do you want to bet that the first version will be free, but the "upgraded" version (containing, mostly useless, extras) will be chargable?

I think I'll stick with Linux and the Open Source software I use on Windows thanks.

Andy
perplekks45 24th September 2008, 11:21 Quote
I like the idea of not having all that crap (or not so much crap but I just don't use it) installed. Using FF and TB myself I can only applaud Microsoft for that. Now get rid of IE in the standard install and I'm happy. ;)
Volund 24th September 2008, 11:36 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by aon`aTv.gsus666
Now get rid of IE in the standard install and I'm happy. ;)

that would be absolutely wonderful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shielder
I think I'll stick with Linux and the Open Source software I use on Windows thanks.

yep
steveo_mcg 24th September 2008, 11:37 Quote
I'm also glad they are pareing things down a bit and "the cloud" seems to be the way to go. We all need a browser out the box these days so maybe a utility built into windows to pick the one you want instead of having ie forced on you.

But some tools are also useful to run local, like the picture and fax viewer to quickly flick through photos.
Cthippo 24th September 2008, 11:43 Quote
Definatly a step in the right direction. Now if they can just strip out IE and WMP, I'll be happy.

Who am I kidding, I'll still be a penguin head, but at least I'll hopefully have fewer reasons to curse at the computer when i have to use a MS app.
Skiddywinks 24th September 2008, 11:46 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradigm Shifter
I like the XP 'Windows Picture and Fax Viewer' for a quick look at a picture, but prefer my own applications for e-mail and editing of any type.

I also love the Picture and Fax viewer, but I have to hand it to MS; this is a great step forward. It is easier for them, and now I don't have anything I never use installed on my PC everytime I do a format.
feedayeen 24th September 2008, 11:52 Quote
The fewer extra features that microsoft bundles with it's operating systems the better, even for their own users. A smaller bundle means that fewer people use a single standard for their software, a smaller population of users will lesson the encintive of hackers to create malware that can abuse that software's rights on the computer.

Besides, this might just be the push that some people need inorder for them to install software properly and safely further increasing tech literacy among the masses (or it will result in many calls from grandmothers about the magic box).
Woodstock 24th September 2008, 11:56 Quote
Can they really get rid of something like IE from the default install, the average user wouldnt be able to just hope on the net then, as they couldnt even download an alternative
Cthippo 24th September 2008, 12:05 Quote
I wouldn't mind them leaving IE in the default install so long as it can be uninstalled.

My big gripe is that even though I never use IE, I have to keep patching it because it creates security issues for the whole system due to the way they welded it to the OS. Hopefully it will be a totally seperate program in Win7 which can be used to download Opera (or FF or Chrome or whatever) and then be uninstalled.

And while I'm dreaming, I'd also like MS to quit supporting any form of DRM
Flibblebot 24th September 2008, 12:21 Quote
I don't think we'll ever see an IE-free version of Windows. As I understand it, it's so deeply tied into the core OS that it would require a complete rewrite from the ground up just to remove it. That's never going to happen.

I do use the photo viewer thingy in Vista & XP though - it's a useful way to browse through photos looking for the one I want without having to fire up Photoshop.
impar 24th September 2008, 12:36 Quote
Greetings!

Good news.

First programs I install are AVG, Comodo, Firefox, Thunderbird, KLite (with Media Player Classic, of course), FastStone Image Viewer and Paint .NET.

Most of the bundled programs Microsoft includes dont get used at all, IE is just used for Windows Update.
GoodBytes 24th September 2008, 12:51 Quote
I like all these tools. They are easy to use, works great for small jobs.
I want them!

Is it REALLY a killer to add a Custom button in Windows Setup where you can add/remove features you want in Windows?!
GoodBytes 24th September 2008, 12:55 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by impar

First programs I install are AVG, Comodo, Firefox, Thunderbird, KLite (with Media Player Classic, of course), FastStone Image Viewer and Paint .NET.
The only think install as basic programs is Firefox, Thunderbird, Vista Codec Pack 64-bit, Jascs PaintShop Pro 7.
I do use A LOT PhotoGallary, as Flibblebot you don't need to wait to startup a monster application just to check pout 1 freaking picture.
Quote:

Most of the bundled programs Microsoft includes don't get used at all
I don't know, Most videos on youtube are done in Windows Movie Maker.
Quote:
IE is just used for Windows Update.
If you use Vista, you will see that Internet Explorer is not only out of the folder system (finally), but even Windows Update is included as part of the OS (no website crap that takes 2 hours to detect the updates and all buggy).

The only time I use Internet Explorer is when I want to run a 64-bit Web browser for those sites that use OS detection to offer you a download. As I want the 64-bit version, I use IE 64-bit.

To add:
Al these tools are fairly light, I mean HDD space is NOT an issue anymore, it doesn't load on the back. PROOF: Windows Vista Business edition doesn't start up faster than the Ultimate edition. As you are are not running these software, it does not eat resources, and Vista take 20min to install, and probably limited to the user optical drive speed. So I REALLY don't see where the "bloatware" is. If it bothers anyone, just delete the start menu shortcut.
yakyb 24th September 2008, 12:57 Quote
yes becuase setup is too complicated!!!


well thats what they think,
they have been pushing to make setup as simple as possible for some time now and by adding in custom install options you complicate things

what they need to implement is a question right at the very start of the process do you want to install windows default or customised.

let us have the choice from the very start anyone who doesnt know to pick default when they are not sure what they are doing has no right to be anywhere near to an OS being installed
Delphium 24th September 2008, 13:05 Quote
Personally id rather have IE kept in windows, think when you do a fresh install, only machine in the house, want to install firfox / drivers for hardware after a fresh build, but wait you cant download anything because no browser, unless you had a firefox install floating around on a usb stick / hard drive etc.

Just means that when you come to install windows, there would be 2 things you would ensure you have, windows install disc, and a usb stick with latest fire fox on
so that you can then download the latest drivers / codecs etc from various sites.

So would rather keep IE, but WMP can go... and keep MPC :D
GoodBytes 24th September 2008, 13:10 Quote
I think WMP 11 is nice ON PAPER. They are some improvement in usability that could be done, but it's really a HUDGE step better than it's previous version (10). The problem is that it's badly optimized, in the sense that when you scale the window, it's slow (well not as fast as other player/software or MPC). If they make WMP11 more optimized, and remove that online store thingy (Zune store, or Windows, decide Microsoft, not both!), I think it would be pretty good already.
roshan 24th September 2008, 13:35 Quote
I dont see any thing better than vista in windows 7 except directx 11 for gamers.
Phil Rhodes 24th September 2008, 13:55 Quote
If they can make the picture viewer slightly less hopelessly slow, I'm all for it.

> Windows Mail ... last seen in Vista

Wouldn't that also be first seen in Vista?
Hamish 24th September 2008, 14:15 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Rhodes
If they can make the picture viewer slightly less hopelessly slow, I'm all for it.

> Windows Mail ... last seen in Vista

Wouldn't that also be first seen in Vista?
previously known as Outlook Express
same thing really though
Bluephoenix 24th September 2008, 14:21 Quote
keep the photo gallery, its actually useful, the rest I could care less about.
Haramzadeh 24th September 2008, 14:50 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by aon`aTv.gsus666
Now get rid of IE in the standard install and I'm happy. ;)

But then how will I download Firefox or Chrome?? :'(
Delphium 24th September 2008, 14:57 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haramzadeh
But then how will I download Firefox or Chrome?? :'(

My sentiments exactly!
Nikumba 24th September 2008, 15:26 Quote
Why should MS take IE out of the next version of windows?

OSX ships out of the box with Safari
Linux ships out the box with Firefox

So what incentive is there for MS to remove IE?

Kimbie
steveo_mcg 24th September 2008, 15:34 Quote
Its gaping security hole is most peoples major bug bear. OSX and (most) Linux Distros ship with a browser but neither integrate them completely in to the core of the os. Thats on top of the anti-competitiveness that is levelled at them.
perplekks45 24th September 2008, 16:08 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo_mcg
Its gaping security hole is most peoples major bug bear. OSX and (most) Linux Distros bother ship with a browser neither integrate them completely in to the core of the os. Thats on top of the anti-competitiveness that is levelled at them.

Exactly. And maybe there could be an option, just a little check box during installation asking you if you want to install IE or not. If you already have downloaded whatever browser you want to use and stored it on a 2nd partition you're fine, if you don't, just install IE with Windows, download the browser of your choice and then get rid of IE again.

Just a thought...
MiNiMaL_FuSS 24th September 2008, 18:08 Quote
i always use nlite and xplite to strip out all the crap from my XP installs and slipstream the service packs in (although SP3 was a mess)...so getting shot fo the crap outta the box is very welcome
Rich_13 24th September 2008, 18:41 Quote
I think the idea of it all being modular would be great. I mean this for the ordinary user and not just the actual computer experts. When u first install windows / get a new pre-built computer it could have a simple step by step process asking you and detailing things like: "would you like a media player, this is what it does", "an e-mail" application (and what it does)" etc. Then you could easily customise your install to your needs and get rid of the bloat. It might even actually teach the users about some of the functionality of their computers.

I do actually like Windows media player though. Apart from that nearly everything else is done by other good software (Open source where possible).
UncertainGod 24th September 2008, 19:28 Quote
Ok so what about messenger & IE?
leexgx 24th September 2008, 20:14 Quote
the thing is you cant just strip out IE as who would you get online to download an new browser

removeing Windows mail will confuse the hell out of new users, as i use outlook it would not bother me
Skill3d 24th September 2008, 20:46 Quote
i always have a cd or usb key with firefox on it as well as all the other handydandy programs
Mr T 24th September 2008, 20:58 Quote
I say great. I hate all the bundled crap with vista.

Id rather it didn't have....

DVD Maker
Mail
Media Centre
Meeting Space
Movie Maker
Calendar
Contacts
Etc

:)
UncertainGod 24th September 2008, 21:01 Quote
When you fire up the installer is should give you the option of deciding if you want IE, messenger or any of the other crap installed. And at the very least IE should be fully removable.
overdosedelusion 24th September 2008, 21:46 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr T
I say great. I hate all the bundled crap with vista.

Id rather it didn't have....

DVD Maker
Mail
Media Centre
Meeting Space
Movie Maker
Calendar
Contacts
Etc

:)

Vista Basic ;)

I can't do without mail though, I much prefer it over web-based mail, and I don't have to bother with thunderpants either. :)
baron02 24th September 2008, 22:40 Quote
It good idea that they gonna strip out picture viewer and windows live mail etc but what about those that do generally use them, Are they make you buy them as a Extra like they do with marketplace
Ramble 24th September 2008, 22:59 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr T
I say great. I hate all the bundled crap with vista.

Id rather it didn't have....

DVD Maker
Mail
Media Centre
Meeting Space
Movie Maker
Calendar
Contacts
Etc

:)

Then you need vLite.
GoodBytes 24th September 2008, 23:09 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo_mcg
Its gaping security hole is most peoples major bug bear. OSX and (most) Linux Distros ship with a browser but neither integrate them completely in to the core of the os. Thats on top of the anti-competitiveness that is levelled at them.

False fact! Sorry, but Vista doesn't have IE included in the core.
Quote:
Then you need vLite.
The problem with vLite is that doesn't do a good job. Every time I tried it, the OS NEVER worked as fine as if I did it with the real disk. This applies for nLite for XP, as well.
Cthippo 25th September 2008, 04:38 Quote
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodBytes
False fact! Sorry, but Vista doesn't have IE included in the core.

So you're saying you can just uninstall IE in Vista without any problems? :|
GoodBytes 25th September 2008, 06:46 Quote
Based on the information provided by Microsoft I have to say technically speaking yes, but you can't remove it. As, if you have a malware that remove the only user web browser IE, then the user lost access to the internet (from the average user perspective, as you have no more web browser (I know I know, but remember the average user doesn't know anything). So Microsoft won't allow it. And if Microsoft lies, then I can't say anything. Provided that they don't lie, then yes.

If I type "C:\" in IE, I get a dialog box saying "A website wants to open web content using this program on your computer [...] Windows Explorer by Microsoft Windows", and a folder opens if you allow it.

If I type an URL in the address bar of a folder, my default web browser (firefox) opens with the link I type.
In addition, IE additional Toolbars can't be visible on the normal folder as they could in XP and older Windows.
Nothing from IE can affect your folders browsing. So either they did a perfect job at separating both or removed Internet Explorer from Windows Explorer.
ClearCaseMan 26th September 2008, 17:45 Quote
A OS should be just that AN OS. period. let me choose the apps I want to use. if they made it where it was only the OS with just what you needed for the OS it would not be such bloatware IMHO.
Saivert 26th September 2008, 18:11 Quote
Internet Explorer 8.0 will be bundled with Windows 7 which is a tremendous step forward. I have it installed now and actually slipstreamed it into my custom Vista install image (using pkgmgr from Windows AIK).
Internet Explorer is a part of Windows now and I don't see it going anywhere. In Vista it's true that the integration with Explorer (file browser) was finally broken, but that is because Vista comes with an entirely new Explorer. Microsoft still uses their MSHTML rendering engine and Browser ActiveX control in several applications and third-party applications also use it. Internet Explorer isn't just a browser, it's a technology. Would you say they remove technology from their OS that they depend on? And don't say you wouldn't mind if Mozilla's technologies were everywhere someday. If you're going to discuss this at least be impartial.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Discuss in the forums

More About...