Intel has announced the availability of draft rev. 0.9 for USB 3.0 Host Controller Interface specs.  An updated draft (rev. 0.95) is expected in the fourth quarter.

Intel has announced the availability of draft rev. 0.9 for USB 3.0 Host Controller Interface specs. An updated draft (rev. 0.95) is expected in the fourth quarter.

Intel has announced the availability of draft revision 0.9 for USB 3.0 Extensible Host Controller Interface (xHCI) specifications, enabling chipset manufacturers to now include support for the new interface in their next-generation products.

The company says that the xHCI specifications will be available royalty-free to all members of the USB 3.0 Promoter Group along with contributor companies that sign an xHCI contributor agreement.

Support for the new specification appears to cover all the major players, including AMD, Dell, Microsoft, NEC and Nvidia, which is great news following the rumbles we were hearing at Computex in June.

During the show, there were several sources close to the USB 3.0 Promoter Group that were complaining—on terms of anonymity, no less—about Intel's lack of openness on the new standard. The closest we got to an on-the-record comment was from Intel, who said that it was still working on finalising the specification before releasing it to anyone else.

The complaints seemed quite serious at the time and came from more than a just a couple of sources – everything seemed to be pointing towards two separate standards being created. Frankly, the split wouldn't have been a good thing for the industry, because we would've seen what happened with USB 1.0 all over again. This kind of thing screws customers over and adoption of the new standard would be cautious until the incompatibilities are worked out – come back when USB 3.1 is released would have been the best way to put it at the time had this happened.

Intel said it plans to release a revised xHCI specification (version 0.95) in the fourth quarter and will be again released royalty-free via an xHCI adopter's agreement. There's more, including quotes from various industry luminaries in the Intel statement released on its website – curiously though, there's no statement from Nvidia.

Discuss in the forums
Quote devdevil85 14th August 2008, 15:40
So Tim, would you say it's safe to invest in 3.0? or should I stay weary?
Quote kenco_uk 14th August 2008, 16:47
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
So Tim, would you say it's safe to invest in 3.0? or should I stay weary?

I know, it's been a long week, huh?

Is it being rationalised at v1? In other words, is it nearly here or is it likely to drag on like the 802.11n debacle?
Quote Zurechial 14th August 2008, 17:56
Is Apple supporting it, or are we still going to have a Firewire/USB split?
Quote devdevil85 14th August 2008, 18:27
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenco_uk
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
So Tim, would you say it's safe to invest in 3.0? or should I stay weary?

I know, it's been a long week, huh?

Is it being rationalised at v1? In other words, is it nearly here or is it likely to drag on like the 802.11n debacle?
Y'know, should I expect to be 'weary' of the future updates/patches/etc. that it will take before we will actually be able to see USB3.0 is all it's theoretical glory....that's what I meant.....no actually I meant leery (hits self on head)
Quote Tim S 14th August 2008, 18:43
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
So Tim, would you say it's safe to invest in 3.0? or should I stay weary?

I dunno, it looks like the forkers that didn't like what Intel was doing are no longer being forkers if you get me... so that means there should be a fairly unified approach by chipset/host controller manufacturers.
Quote devdevil85 14th August 2008, 19:31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim S
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
So Tim, would you say it's safe to invest in 3.0? or should I stay weary?

I dunno, it looks like the forkers that didn't like what Intel was doing are no longer being forkers if you get me... so that means there should be a fairly unified approach by chipset/host controller manufacturers.
Ok. Good to hear.
Quote kenco_uk 14th August 2008, 23:07
weary

wary

:(
Quote johnmustrule 14th August 2008, 23:29
What happend with USB 1.0 links plz? I'd be nice if the 3.0 spec let you connect muliple smart machines through the connection, like 2 computers or something.
Quote devdevil85 15th August 2008, 16:42
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenco_uk
weary

wary

:(
Thank you kenco for making me feel like an idiot.
Quote kenco_uk 15th August 2008, 16:54
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
Thank you kenco for making me feel like an idiot.

Hopefully taken in jest :)
Quote devdevil85 15th August 2008, 18:19
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenco_uk
Quote:
Originally Posted by devdevil85
Thank you kenco for making me feel like an idiot.

Hopefully taken in jest :)
It was, and now I'm a smarter person because of it. hellz yeah!
Quote rhuitron 16th August 2008, 16:56
I really hope this isn't another N-draft disaster.
Where companies push out a crappy product, just to make the "Edge" money.

I really rather wait longer, pay a little more, than have to completely lose my patience with a draft.
Quote Saivert 18th August 2008, 02:59
Excuse me but the Draft-N routers were better than the G ones. They offer better speeds with compatible equipment (mainly from same manufacturer) so you get what you pay for. Don't come here and say you actually would like the industry to wait many years before they offered better speeds than 802.11g

But with USB 3.0 I think they can wait a bit longer. It's not like people are dissatisfied with USB 2.0 yet.
Quote kenco_uk 18th August 2008, 10:05
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saivert
Excuse me but the Draft-N routers were better than the G ones. They offer better speeds with compatible equipment (mainly from same manufacturer) so you get what you pay for. Don't come here and say you actually would like the industry to wait many years before they offered better speeds than 802.11g

But it's taking so long to ratify it. I'm assuming that any and all draft-n kit will be firmware upgradable to the full N-spec (if it ever changes)?

Draft-N kit is potentially very good, I think when I had a Belkin pre-N network setup at home, I was getting something like 260mbps over the air, which is quite impressive when you use it.

However, the Belkin N1 usb adapter caused major issues for me. For some reason, the mouse would stop responding, necessitating in unplugging and replugging the usb dongle for my Logitech G7 to get it working again (not an issue with the router, I might add, but what's the use of a wireless connection when you have no way of receiving it?) It worked a lot better after a couple of windows updates for the Belkin stick, but was never perfect. Meanwhile a Netgear WG111v2 stick (802.11g) works flawlessly.
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.





Stats: 0.151 seconds