Intel has formally announced that its upcoming line of Nehalem processors will use the Core i7 brand name.

Intel has formally announced that its upcoming line of Nehalem processors will use the Core i7 brand name.

Intel has formally confirmed that its upcoming line of Nehalem processors will fit under the Intel Core branding scheme, following several weeks of speculation about what processors based on the new microarchitecture would be called.

What's interesting though is the choice of suffix Intel will use with the new chips; instead of opting for the natural successor to Core 2, Core 3, Intel will oddly use the "i7" suffix.

The statement issued by Intel says that "this is the first of several new identifiers to come as different products launch over the next year," before going onto point out that the brand logo will be available for high performance desktop PCs. This leads us to believe that the mobile and low-end desktop processors may carry a different suffix—or indeed brand—from the high-end products.

The new logo looks quite a bit different to the older Core 2 design, as the white background behind the Intel logo has disappeared. The new Core i7 logo is made up of several different shades of blue, while there will be a separate black logo reserved for Intel's Extreme Edition processors – all wording on both badges will be in white.

Finally, despite the hint that there may be more brands being unveiled for low-end and mobile processor products, Intel confirmed that processors will still continue to be differentiated by model numbers.

The first Core i7-based products expected to be released in the fourth quarter of this year will be Intel's first native quad-core processors and will signal the comeback for Intel Hyper-Threading Technology following its absence from the original Core microarchitecture. This will enable the chips to handle up to eight software threads on the four physical processing cores.

What do you think of Intel's new branding scheme for Nehalem? Share your thoughts in the forums.
Quote Timmy_the_tortoise 11th August 2008, 13:46
I prefer Nehalem.
Quote Tyrmot 11th August 2008, 14:09
i7? Bit rubbish isn't it?
Quote LeMaltor 11th August 2008, 14:12
As I asked in another thread, where's/what's i1 to i6?
Quote C-Sniper 11th August 2008, 14:18
I like the code names better than the real names. Nehalem just sounds cool.
Quote Redbeaver 11th August 2008, 14:27
i like either way.

but i like the performance the most. if the performance preview is as good as they say, that thing can be called Intel HelloKitty for all I care.......
Quote Dr. Strangelove 11th August 2008, 14:45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redbeaver
i like either way.

but i like the performance the most. if the performance preview is as good as they say, that thing can be called Intel HelloKitty for all I care.......

Ahh but a CPU named HelloKitty would also be cooler than i7 !!
Quote Timmy_the_tortoise 11th August 2008, 14:49
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove
Ahh but a CPU named HelloKitty would also be cooler than i7 !!

However, if it were named Intel Core Turd...
Quote sotu1 11th August 2008, 14:54
i7 suggests to n00bs that this computer works with internet explorer 7, thus expanding MS marketshare of browsers...duh....
Quote salesman 11th August 2008, 15:16
Sounds like intel has exhausted their creativity with this naming scheme, but as someone else mentioned I don't care about the name just the performance. Way to make news intel with your naming scheme.
Quote theevilelephant 11th August 2008, 15:19
Well i make this either the fifth Core product, Conroe, Wolfdale, Kentsfield, Yorkfield, Nahelem,. Or the sixth Conroe, Mobile, Wolfdale, Kentsfield, Yorkfield, Nahelem,. So unless I've missed something i have no idea where they got the i 7 from lol

edit: found another, Yonah.
Quote sjhujh 11th August 2008, 15:26
possibly i7 (i.e. intel 7) for 7th generation chip since the company started? haven't counted how many they have had so maybe wrong...
Quote Orlix 11th August 2008, 15:57
lets see... 4 pentiums plus a series D plus a core 2 duo? Thats 6 so this is intel 7? Bah... and let me guess the name of the mobile ones. m7 or i7mobile...
Quote Timmy_the_tortoise 11th August 2008, 16:00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlix
lets see... 4 pentiums plus a series D plus a core 2 duo? Thats 6 so this is intel 7? Bah... and let me guess the name of the mobile ones. m7 or i7mobile...

What about all the chips before Pentium though?

80386 and so on...
Quote Nexxo 11th August 2008, 16:02
iPeen?

No wait, Apple probably already reserved that one. :)

Perhaps they should just appeal to the target consumer and call it i7-of-9. :D
Quote Tim S 11th August 2008, 16:10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlix
lets see... 4 pentiums plus a series D plus a core 2 duo? Thats 6 so this is intel 7? Bah... and let me guess the name of the mobile ones. m7 or i7mobile...

You're forgetting everything from 8086 onwards... I've gone through various iterations of what it could mean, and the only one I can come up with (at the moment) is that it's the 7th generation architecture if you fit the Core microarchitecture under the P6 umbrella, as they went 'forwards' with Netburst and then returned back to P6 with refinements for Core.
Quote Timmy_the_tortoise 11th August 2008, 16:24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim S
You're forgetting everything from 8086 onwards... I've gone through various iterations of what it could mean, and the only one I can come up with (at the moment) is that it's the 7th generation architecture if you fit the Core microarchitecture under the P6 umbrella, as they went 'forwards' with Netburst and then returned back to P6 with refinements for Core.

According to Wikipedia, Netburst was the 7th Generation Microarchitecture.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The P6 microarchitecture is the sixth generation Intel x86 microprocessor architecture, released in 1995. It was succeeded by the NetBurst microarchitecture in 2000

There really is no logic to this new nomenclature...
Quote wuyanxu 11th August 2008, 16:32
what is the point of Core and Core2 if they don't intend to contiue it?

i7..... stupid name, just like GTX series graphics card and p35 (where's p25 and p15? )
Quote Tim S 11th August 2008, 16:40
The way I looked at it was as follows:

- 16-bit x86 (8086 -> 80286)
- 386 series
- 486 series
- Pentium 'classic'
- P6/Pentium M/Yonah/Core
- Netburst

There was also a bunch of additional processors released in the 80s and 90s (including the iAPX 432, 80960, 80860, etc) and there was also the Itanic microarchitecture, but none of them are x86 compatible.

Even with this, I don't think I'm right... it just happened to be something I spent my lunchtime trying to understand. And that was as close as I got.
Quote Furymouse 11th August 2008, 16:58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim S
The way I looked at it was as follows:

- 16-bit x86 (8086 -> 80286)
- 386 series
- 486 series
- Pentium 'classic'
- P6/Pentium M/Yonah/Core
- Netburst

There was also a bunch of additional processors released in the 80s and 90s (including the iAPX 432, 80960, 80860, etc) and there was also the Itanic microarchitecture, but none of them are x86 compatible.

Even with this, I don't think I'm right... it just happened to be something I spent my lunchtime trying to understand. And that was as close as I got.

I hope you were having chips while thinking about that. :) The irony alone is delicious.

Does it really matter what it means though? A names a name. Except maybe the Intel Core Toaster.
Quote Nexxo 11th August 2008, 17:00
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furymouse
Except maybe the Intel Core Toaster.
That would have been the old P4's, right?
Quote samkiller42 11th August 2008, 17:01
I like the new logo design, as for the name 'i7' well, it's not very catchy is it, i mean, core 2 duo/quad could roll of the tounge quiet nicely, but this simply doesn't.

Sam
Quote chicorasia 11th August 2008, 17:27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy_the_tortoise
I prefer Nehalem.

From Wikipedia:
The Tillamook are a Native American tribe from Oregon of the Salish linguistic group. The name Tillamook is a Chinook term meaning "people of Nekelim (or Nehalem)" and is also spelt Calamox, Gillamooks and Killamook

I suppose intel wouldn't risk being sued by the remnants of said tribe. Besides, I'd imagine they can't patent the name Nehalem, just as they couldn't patent 80386, 80486 and 80586 - american IP law forbids the patenting of sequences of nunmbers - which is why it was named Pentium.
Quote Phil Rhodes 11th August 2008, 18:36
Well, that's a counterintuitive, fundamentally meaningless and sense-free piece of corpo-gibberish that can only be thought up by an outfit the size of Intel.
Quote Drachnem 11th August 2008, 20:21
Start saving $$$ lol.
Quote OleJ 11th August 2008, 22:08
Isn't the i7 a highway in the states or something?
Quote Joeymac 11th August 2008, 23:05
No one likes new names.... in a couple of months it'll all be forgotten and all will treat the name like it's perfectly normal. The standard example for this type of thing.... the wii. Intel probably could have called this the 'Core Wonder Pump'. In fact they should have.

So seriously, who gives a flying duck?
Quote ParaHelix.org 12th August 2008, 00:08
I don't care if it's called "Intel AMD core" aslong as it gives osme decent performance. Actually, please, never say Intel and AMD in same sentance like I did, I'm sorry. *CandyMan scrapes me from his hook*
Quote Neogumbercules 12th August 2008, 05:52
It could be called the Intel Child Killer and I wouldn't care. As long as it performs well and lives up to it's claims, I'd buy it.
Quote outlawaol 12th August 2008, 07:05
What about the Intel Adolf Hitler nazi core? Come on Intel, stir up the waters already! ;)

But seriously... who cares? It could be named Mud on my shoe and I wouldnt care. It would have been interesting to see a more clever name to taunt AMD, but as you can see they dont care much about AMD as a threat anymore. Heh...
Quote Ghys 12th August 2008, 07:42
I'll go against the popular trend and say (admit?) that I actually like it

It sounds better in french than english

"ee xept" sounds better than "HI seven"
Quote Xir 12th August 2008, 08:57
after trying to explain to my dad the differences between:
Computer core "core"
Computer core "core duo"
Computer core "core two" (yes it's called two, no int's not a dual core)
Computer core "core two duo"
Computer core "Pentium dual core" (Yes it says core but isn't a core core or a core two core but a pentium M core...twice *sigh*)

I'd be happy if they just name the things something different every generation.
Quote WildThing 12th August 2008, 11:45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrmot
i7? Bit rubbish isn't it?

+1
Quote DXR_13KE 12th August 2008, 12:57
and another company adopting the i in their nomenclature.... i bet there is a porn site called iF***.

edit: or iPorn
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.





Stats: 0.119 seconds