No netbook chips due from AMD

No netbook chips due from AMD

Hopes of an Atom-beating low-voltage chip to come from AMD appear to be dashed, according to Dessau.

AMD isn't looking to compete in the low-cost 'netbook' market, according to comments by its chief marketing officer this week.

Nigel Dessau has been quoted by eWeek as saying that the company isn't saying “[the netbook market] is not an important segment and we're not saying it's not a growing segment” but admits that “[AMD is] a smaller company and we have to focus on what we do well at this point. We are watching that segment rather than playing in it, but as it matures we'll see where it goes.

While it's unsurprising that AMD is shy about competing head-on with Intel's Atom range and ultra-low-voltage chips from specialists such as Via, it's hard to deny that there is a rapidly growing market for the relatively underpowered ultra-portable low-cost 'netbook' devices – a market that rival Intel, a name that is cropping up in the overwhelming majority of such devices, is riding to success.

Rumours that AMD was due to release an Atom competitor codenamed “Bobcat” would appear to be quashed by these latest comments by Dessau – despite comments by Dirk Meyer, the new CEO of the company, hinting at an ultra-low voltage chip arriving before the end of the year.

Looking at the issue from AMD's perspective, on the one hand I agree with their decision: Intel has such an entrenched foothold in the market, and the difference in developing a high-performance low-cost chip – which AMD has traditionally excelled at – and in developing a medium-performance low-voltage low-cost chip – something AMD doesn't have a lot of experience of, outside the low-performance Geode – is likely to cause the company some headaches when it does decide to enter the market, especially when you take into account the losses the company is making quarter on quarter. However, leaving the market entirely to Intel – with Via picking up a few percent share here and there – doesn't seem like the smartest thing to do either.

Any AMD fans disappointed at the news that the Bobcat appears to be a red herring, or do you think Dessau's comments are nothing more than misdirection to keep its rivals from guessing the company's true intentions? Share your thoughts over in the forums.


Discuss in the forums Reply
mrb_no1 23rd July 2008, 09:40 Quote
his repsonse is fair enough really, they are failing to compete with intel on the mass market processor front so why put resources into a growing market that wont see such fruitful returns as the one they want to focus on, no real surprise there for me.


cjoyce1980 23rd July 2008, 09:54 Quote
they do need another AthlonXP processor
Panos 23rd July 2008, 13:06 Quote
AMD has the XPG technology now. Why they need low power CPU?
How we will play Crysis 2 on external connected 48xx system, having something asthmatic like the Atom? :)
frontline 23rd July 2008, 13:38 Quote
I think it's probably the right decision at the minute, they need to concentrate on the main desktop market and clawing back a bigger share of it.
1ad7 23rd July 2008, 16:30 Quote
they have decided to fight two fights rather than kinda stand up to 50 fights... I think its a great idea, they cant beat intel but maybe they could get a low blow in with a desktop cpu.... lets hope right
DXR_13KE 24th July 2008, 00:48 Quote
concentrate on getting stable first... we cant risk a monopoly...
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.

Discuss in the forums