Metallica is hoping that a move to digital distribution will keep them afloat following the end of their contract with Warner Music Group.

Metallica is hoping that a move to digital distribution will keep them afloat following the end of their contract with Warner Music Group.

If you're a fan of Metallica, then you may have reason to rejoice pretty soon: Lars Ulrich appears to be considering a Radiohead-inspired free-for-all digital release.

According to a report on Wired.com, the drummer is quoted as pointing out that their next album will be “our last record under contract with Warner [Music Group], so we're looking at how we can embrace everything.

Ulrich goes on to say that the band has “been observing Radiohead and Trent Reznor and in twenty-seven years or however long it takes for the next record, we'll be looking forward to everything in terms of possibilities with the Internet.”

Ulrich's comments will come as a shock to some, as the drummer is famous for personally delivering a hard-copy printout listing over 335,000 individuals who had been sharing Metallica songs via the Napster file-sharing network to the headquarters of the struggling quasi-legal startup.

Clearly, times have changed since then. With Trent Reznor clearly enjoying the benefits that DRM-free digital distribution has to offer, it has to look promising to a group with a contract due for expiry real-soon-now, even if Thom Yorke has had a harder time of it.

While Ulrich hasn't set anything in concrete, it's clear by the success of the Nine Inch Nails experiment that fans want DRM-free, high-quality digital copies bundled with as many extras as the band can produce – anything less, and Metallica could well face failure in the digital domain.

What's your take: is it smoke and mirrors in an attempt to scare Warner Music Group into extending his contract, or do you agree with Ulrich et al that digital distribution is the way forward? Share your thoughts over in the forums.
Quote Woodstock 29th April 2008, 08:45
gimmie some flac metaillica goodness anyday
Quote xrob 29th April 2008, 08:59
they killed napster, and they suck
Quote Bauul 29th April 2008, 09:32
Wow that's great news, that'll....

LOL, sorry, I can't keep a straight face. The only reason Metallica want to give away their album for free is that, chances are, it'll be so excruitiatingly crap no-one would pay money for it.
Quote yakyb 29th April 2008, 09:39
hell looks like they are try warner music which is only a good thing really
Quote badders 29th April 2008, 09:39
It's. Just. Noise.
Quote chrisuk 29th April 2008, 09:59
Bauul hit the (albeit massive) nail on the head.

Although, who'd even want St. Anger free? And in high quality? I can bang a biscuit tin with a stick and get the same quality and I don't even have to waste any bandwidth to do it.
Quote mmorgue 29th April 2008, 10:12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauul
Wow that's great news, that'll....

LOL, sorry, I can't keep a straight face. The only reason Metallica want to give away their album for free is that, chances are, it'll be so excruitiatingly crap no-one would pay money for it.

LOL! That's exactly what I starting saying.. :D

Yep, if it was the old Metallica, (RTL, MOP, K'EA, etc) then sure -- but they went "pop" a long time ago and Ulrich is just a ***** now. They saw the entire record company business model falling apart and decided to change stance to appear as tho, "they're listening" to the consumers.

Sorry boys, we can see thru it. Nice try tho! :D
Quote Flibblebot 29th April 2008, 10:18
Hypocrites.

'Nuff said.
Quote Shielder 29th April 2008, 11:04
I've got every Metallica album they've released over here, but I never listen to St. Anger. It was very very crap. Once Jason left, they should have just put away the guitars and got the zimmer frames out.

Andy
Quote Zurechial 29th April 2008, 12:13
They should have just put it up on Napster.
Quote nakchak 29th April 2008, 12:28
Hopefully it wont be annother st anger, but i aint hopeful, still the live shows still good

would love it if was distributed via napster, would be comedy
Quote cyrilthefish 29th April 2008, 16:21
Quote:
or do you agree with Ulrich et al that digital distribution is the way forward?
Now if the music industry had twigged onto this fact 10 years ago, i wonder how much better they'd be off by now?

Quote DXR_13KE 29th April 2008, 16:59
i think it is a little to late..... but at least it is a start.
Quote freedom810 29th April 2008, 17:22
Dosent bother me, wherever metallica goes there sure to be huge. I love there music and so do millions of others.
Quote MrMonroe 29th April 2008, 18:07
This would have made me really excited...

If I had heard it maybe nine years ago.

Burn out > fade away
Quote pendragon 29th April 2008, 18:20
i was really disappointed by St. Anger.. I had really enjoyed all their music until then... I've gone onto much bigger and better things since.. however, this is a step in the right direction for them.. even if it does seem like Lars is just pulling a PR stunt.

However, there's plenty of die-hard metallica fans who will rejoice, as Freedom810 points out.
Quote jkeyser14 29th April 2008, 23:29
Screw them, I refuse to listen to their music after what they did to Napster.
Quote Redbeaver 30th April 2008, 09:06
Metallica is god.

they can kill the whole torrent system for all i care and i will still buy their album.

ya call me a fanboi.

except for St. Anger.
Quote Bauul 30th April 2008, 11:33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redbeaver

ya call me a fanboi.

Ok, you're a fanboi. St. Anger was the crap at the bottom of the barrel and the epitomy of a great band so far up their own arses, so removed from reality, so void of any talent left whatsoever they genuinely believed kicking the crap out of a water cooler for an hour constituted music. It wasn't the beginning of the end though, whilst the Black Album was good it was signs of things to come, and Load and Reload were real snoozers.

Put on Ronnie, look me in the eye and try to tell me that "yeah, this is good metal". I dare you.
Quote DeSean 30th April 2008, 11:37
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bauul
Wow that's great news, that'll....

LOL, sorry, I can't keep a straight face. The only reason Metallica want to give away their album for free is that, chances are, it'll be so excruitiatingly crap no-one would pay money for it.


I don't see any mention of them giving it away for free? They will charge the usual price for it any it will probably sell over 3 million copies, just like the worst of their music has done in the past.

You may not like them, and lots of people here clearly don't, but they are still extremely popular, and i'd far rather have them still producing original material than do what so many other older bands are doing with reunion tours etc.

Quote Bauul 30th April 2008, 14:25
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeSean
I don't see any mention of them giving it away for free? They will charge the usual price for it any it will probably sell over 3 million copies, just like the worst of their music has done in the past.

True 3 million people bought it. Did 3 million people like it? Will those 3 million people buy the next one? That's what you need to ask.
Quote Lazarus Dark 1st May 2008, 00:14
Sadly, I have outgrown Metallica. They are a great intro band to metal for people transitioning from pop and rock. But after a couple years you learn that there are far better bands out there.

And with the Napster thing, this just sounds completely hippocritical, even if Lars has seen the light, so to speak.

I didn't buy St Anger and I kinda doubt the new one will be worth buying either.
Quote The_Beast 3rd May 2008, 02:28
I hope it's good


not that St. Anger sh*t
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.





Stats: 0.129 seconds