Microsoft is one step closer to making OOXML the official portable format for office documents.

Microsoft is one step closer to making OOXML the official portable format for office documents.

The International Standards Organisation has voted to approve Microsoft's Office Open XML file format as an official international standard, but critics say that's not good enough.

The new format – a series of XML files contained in a compressed archive – was introduced with Microsoft Office 2007, and sparked fears that a new format would lock users in to Microsoft products and prevent interoperability with other office products.

After a decision by Massachusetts state government to mandate the use of ODF – the OpenDocument Format favoured by OpenOffice.org and other would-be MS Office killers – in 2005, Microsoft chose to hand responsibility for the fledgling format over to a third party company called Ecma International, who submitted the OOXML format to ISO for approval as an international standard.

In theory, that's a good thing: as an official international standard OOXML will see support outside the Microsoft monoculture, and other office suites – including the popular OpenOffice.org open-source package – will be free to add support for opening and saving files created by the new version of Microsoft Office. The move will also prevent the possibility of Microsoft ditching its new format some time in the future and rendering old files incompatible with newer Office versions, as there will always be something that can read an ISO-approved file.

Fans of the rival ODF say that this is another example of Microsoft forcing their pseudo-standards on an unwilling public. Marino Marcich, head of the OpenDocument Format Alliance – so hardly an unbiased observer – said in a statement that “OOXML doesn't play well with the products of other software companies,” and accused Microsoft of a failure to fully document all the intricacies of the format in order to ensure their own Office package has the best OOXML support around. He also claims that parts of the code needed to parse OOXML files are proprietary, leaving companies that adopt the format open to accusations of copyright infringement from the software giant.

Marcich also points out that the current version of Office 2007 uses a version of OOXML which is subtly different from that submitted to ISO. That said, it's expected that Microsoft will release an update to its office suite now that the OOXML format has been officially standardised.

It's not just members of the rival format club who aren't happy with the decision, however. Steve Pepper, a member of Norway's standards body, claims that Microsoft used the bully-boy tactics to cajole the group into voting for the OOXML format. Speaking to the Associated Press in Switerzand, Pepper called the decision “a tragedy for standardisation.”

Microsoft is, of course, upbeat about the whole thing. Tom Robertson, Microsoft's general manager for interoperability and standards, claims that “input from technical experts, customers and governments around the world has greatly improved the Open XML specification,” and that the changes made to gain ISO approval will make the format “even more useful to developers and customers.

Do you support Microsoft's effort to improve interoperability between rival office applications, or is it just another smoke and mirrors session from a perfidious monopoly? Share your thoughts over in the forums.
Newsletter

Register for the bit-tech newsletter to receive the latest news and reviews in your inbox.



Quote chicorasia 3rd April 2008, 12:48
The funny thing is: OpenOffice and NeoOffice (openoffice for OSX) can read and write XML, while MS Office won't read ODF files...

I suppose that now MS can say it doesn't need to bother about adding ODF support to Office, since their proprietary open format (if there's such thing!) is ISO approved!
Quote quack 3rd April 2008, 13:54
This might help... http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=169337
Quote UncertainGod 3rd April 2008, 14:08
I wonder how much it cost them to buy off the uk and other countries delegations?
Quote TRG 3rd April 2008, 15:16
Millions, and Millions, but the money doesn't matter. Congradulations, ECMA, you are the most abusive standards body in the world. I think that Google and IBM need a hug for trying their very best to prevent this, but in the end, Microsoft has a lot more partners than either of them. I am going to try to find a list of those companies which were puppets for MS, so that I know never to recommend their products ever again. I know that HP is on the dark side, as is Novel, but I can't think of any others right now.
Quote johnmustrule 4th April 2008, 06:15
as obviously wrapped in agendas this is, its purely good news for the 99% of computer users who REALLY need simplicity
Quote steveo_mcg 4th April 2008, 09:19
Quite far from purely good news mate. Its good news if you subscribe to the MS upgrade circus apart from that its pretty much bad.
Quote Shielder 4th April 2008, 09:20
Yes, that's why we already have an ISO document standard... ODF.

Why confuse the market by having two competing standards, one of which isn't even documented properly.

Oh, and one of the standards can be used natively on just about any computer you like, from an EeePC all the way up to the most powerful supercomputers available.

Andy
Quote Shielder 4th April 2008, 11:06
Apparently, that Norway "yes" vote went against 80% of the committee members "No" recommendation.

MS democracy in action.

Andy
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



MSI P45 Series Motherboards


Stats: 0.187 seconds