Seagate CEO Bill Watkins doesn't think that the humble hard drive has much to worry about from SSDs.
Rumours that solid-state drives are failing all over the place may have turned out to be
unfounded, but Seagate still isn't convinced the technology is the right choice for today.
Despite the fact that Seagate is launching just as many SSD models as the next big harddrive manufacturer, CEO Bill Watkins seems to think that the devices are just too expensive for the data they hold. In an interview with
CNN Watkins admitted that “
realistically, I just don't see the flash notebook selling.”
Just in case the consumers see things differently, the well-heeled executive has another trick up his Saville Row sleeve though: he's fairly certain that Seagate is going to be able to bury rival SSD manufacturers in enough legal wrangling that his company will emerge on-top should the market take off. It seems that Watkins is convinced that pretty much every SSD maker out there – he drops names like Samsung and Intel with ease – might just owe his company big-time bucks due to certain patents Seagate holds on the interfacing of storage devices with host computers.
It's not uncommon for large companies to have vast swathes of patents – in the US, at least – that are almost completely without merit. Due to the way the patent process works in the US, it's possible to get almost any patent granted – no matter how obvious your breakthrough. What matters is whether the claims will hold up in court. While it's useful for Seagate to worry its enemies by making reference to an army of lawyers sat on cast-iron patents, it remains to be seen whether the company would risk having their patents invalidated should they bring them before a court.
One thing is for sure: Intel and Samsung are unlikely to take this lying down. The SSD market – whether it's as big as Samsung hope or as small as Seagate thinks – looks set to be the next battleground for the storage giants.
Do you agree with Watkins' take on the SSD market, or do you think he's completely missed the point? Share your thoughts over in
the forums.
17 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyCouldn't give a toss about capacity - 32GB is more than enough for work + a bit of fun. Sure, on a per GB price basis it's more expensive but it will certain fall into "affordable if you want it" soon enough
Fantastic attitude.
Wonderful. Very helpful.
God almighty...
The MTBF for SSDs is very high. Plus you do not have to worry about dropping it while it is on and breaking it (I did that with an external once).
As soon as the transfer speeds and capacity increase more people will start buying and the price will plummet. It is already happening. Anyone who does not see that is an idiot.
BTW I love Seagate, I think they make excellent drives. But Watkins is either dumber than a box of rocks or is looking for some sort of effect by saying that.
You mean, having the words "seagate" and "SSD" on the headlines of every tech site? :D
From what I have seen, Seagate drives are among the most reliable and least noisy (varies between models). Hitachi, however... don't get me started on that one...
I run Seagate and WD in all the computers i have chosen drives for myself.
Seagate needs to be hit with a stick, or a trout
RE reliability - no company is more or less reliable than any other. Different models of drives may be particularly robust and others could be terribly unreliable. Every manufacturer out there has had a generation of drives that were complete lemons, Seagate included.
HAhahahaa
True. Definitely true. I can only speak from personal experience in saying that every Maxtor I've ever gotten died a quick death for really no apparent reason. And the replacements. Other brands I've tended to have a better track-record with.
as for me, give me hard-state mag-ram and then we're talking
[QUOTE=Smilodon]
Hitachi are the only brand that haven't failed me yet. WDs crapped out on me twice and were the most expensive. Seagate drive failed, Samsung one works but slowly for no apparent reason. Personal experience means basically bugger all because anyone can have bad luck.
I have worked with lots of computers, and can say that the current drives from Hitachi seems to be utter crap. Maxtor was also crap, but they don't exist any more, so... (Bought by Seagate IIRC)
I've used oodles of maxtor drives and have had just one fail (out of dozens). Even the ones that were from the "crap" series were fine. Had a couple of IBMs fail years ago, but never lost an HGST drive. Samsung and Fujitsu have also been completely solid in my experience. Seagate has the worst track record with me, both with desktop and enterprise drives. Go figure.
Maxtor was indeed bought by Seagate. Some of the most amusing advice I've ever seen on a forum was something along the lines of "Maxtor drives are crap, buy this Seagate drive instead" with a link to a "Seagate" drive that was actually a rebranded Maxtor
Bingo.
I've had/experienced at least one drive from all the major manufacturers from most of their lines over the years, and the only one that died was a Maxtor DM9 - 3 years after its warranty was up. That includes IBM 75GXP's and allsorts of "unreliable" and otherwise crappy drives.
HGST's are my current favourite because they're pretty fast, fairly quiet and a bit cheaper than most brands.