DoubleClick's DART program has surcome to virus laced Flash adverts.

DoubleClick's DART program has surcome to virus laced Flash adverts.

If you chose to not run an antivirus because you only visit trusted sites, then you might want to reconsider getting one. The latest security breach on the internet has come from an unsuspecting place as banner adverts on some major websites may contain a virus.

It seems that some nice guy out there has figured out a way to inject a virus into flash-based banner ads and get them into DoubleClick's DART program. Once in rotation, it seems that the malware is either time or site triggered and then begins its assault on personal data on your PC.

You'll know instantly if you've come across one of these infected banners because of the following: first, your web browser will close down and then reopen with a redirect to an antivirus site. A dialog box will then pop up telling you that your computer is infected and that it is scanning your hard drive. Finally, the malware attempts to download software to your computer and then "scans" your hard drive another time.

The malicious ads have been found on major sites such as Canada.com, MLB.com, and Economist.com. You shouldn't need to worry too much about it though as DoubleClick has taken measures now to improve security. The company says that it has found and disabled a hundred ads so far.

"This is an industry-wide challenge. Unfortunately, there are bad actors who misrepresent themselves and purchase advertising as an avenue to distribute malware. This has the potential to affect all businesses and consumers in the online environment," says Sean Harvey, DoubleClick DART senior product manager.

It seems that no matter how safe you are on the web these days, you're eventually going to get hit with a virus or other malicious code.

Do you still not run an antivirus or have you finally decided to pick one up? Leave your suggestions for a great antivirus (free or not) over in the forums.
Newsletter

Register for the bit-tech newsletter to receive the latest news and reviews in your inbox.



Quote airchie 16th November 2007, 14:21
A modified hosts file combined with NoScript pretty much keeps me safe IMO. :)
Quote samkiller42 16th November 2007, 14:27
What about the ad's around bit-tech, can we ba assured they don't contain any nastys?

Sam
Quote Lowsidex2 16th November 2007, 14:27
I LOVE my ad and banner blocker even more now. Even Bit-Tech is annoying with all those animations going off everywhere. But I am careful about where I go and don't run a virus program. It seems most malware just disables them anyway.
Quote Silver51 16th November 2007, 15:16
I know disabling ads and not clicking on them hurts sites like Bit-Tech*, but web advertising is becoming so much more invasive these days. Video ads which slow page loading. Flashing, blinking and audio ads making it difficult to concentrate on page contents. I used to disable web ads in the days of 56k, but these days I do it for a quiet life.

I always felt that there was a threat of malware or something nasty coming from advertising. It wants you to buy something, but I just won't part with my cash if I have a bad feeling about the link.


*Which is disabled if I like the look of the full page art on the font page. Clicked on the Crysis link a couple of days ago.
Quote Hiren 16th November 2007, 15:28
Quote:
Originally Posted by samkiller42
What about the ad's around bit-tech, can we ba assured they don't contain any nastys?

Sam

Yes you can, we test internally before putting stuff live on the site.
Quote The_Pope 16th November 2007, 15:29
We also don't use DoubleClick
Quote DrFreeze 16th November 2007, 15:55
ugh, yet another reason to addblock the living crap out of the internet

(and off course, run linux bwahahahahahahahahaha)
Quote Silver51 16th November 2007, 16:40
Giving it some thought, ads wouldn't be so bad if they were actually useful.

Say, for example, hardware ads on bit which gave you multiple click through options. Personally I have a number of trusted places I'd rather buy hardware from on the internet, but if banner ads gave you more information; multiple resellers, listed prices, p+p, availability etc, it would make them more of a service than a hindrance.
Quote -EVRE- 16th November 2007, 17:11
^^ Silver51^^ makes a good point.

I'm running AVG even tho its not the best... it eats ALOT of cpu horse power.
*Thats why I want a tri core! :b I dont care if its a failed quad core*
Quote Icy EyeG 16th November 2007, 17:25
I can't see this news title nor the comment count on the front page.... Is there anything wrong?
I've tried on IE and FireFox...
Quote RTT 16th November 2007, 17:46
I got this the other day - I was on PC Mag or Download.com or something and a new window opened from nowhere, pretended to do a spyware scan, found OMG BAD SPYWARE and then downloaded an exe to my desktop.

I laughed though, since i was on OS X at the time :D
Quote:
I can't see this news title nor the comment count on the front page.... Is there anything wrong?
I've tried on IE and FireFox...

Don't worry - the site is cached. It will catch up (it has now)
Quote zoom314 16th November 2007, 18:12
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrFreeze
ugh, yet another reason to adblock the living crap out of the internet

(and off course, run linux bwahahahahahahahahaha)

Ditto, Couldn't agree more.
Quote E.E.L. Ambiense 16th November 2007, 18:17
Quote:
Originally Posted by CardJoe
...a virus contained in the banner ads.

So do many of my ex's. :D

Seriously, that sucks though. But not uncommon, I suppose.
Quote pendragon 16th November 2007, 20:38
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pope
We also don't use DoubleClick

omg, thank you! there's enough of their crap on the internet as it is!
Quote Tyinsar 16th November 2007, 22:09
Quote:
Originally Posted by pendragon
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pope
We also don't use DoubleClick
omg, thank you! there's enough of their crap on the internet as it is!
I was about to say the same thing
Quote The_Beast 16th November 2007, 22:29
I don't like ads, 1 in 100 are actually useful
Quote samkiller42 16th November 2007, 22:40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hiren
Yes you can, we test internally before putting stuff live on the site.

Well thats good to know then, cheers for answering.

Sam
Quote duc 16th November 2007, 23:00
I don't mind the ads on Bit-tech as its not intrusive and doesn't freeze-up waiting for a response from an ad-server, ie Hexus.
Quote jakenbake 16th November 2007, 23:23
it could be worse. they could do those underlined keyword things that pop up when you scroll over them. most annoying thing EVER.
Quote Andy Mc 17th November 2007, 00:10
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakenbake
it could be worse. they could do those underlined keyword things that pop up when you scroll over them. most annoying thing EVER.

I F*****G _HATE_ those adverts more than you can imagine, I find them more annoying than pop-ups.
Quote cpemma 17th November 2007, 00:46
Maybe an opportune time to point out that Kasperky are selling all home user products half-price until Xmas... ;)
Quote zoom314 17th November 2007, 01:22
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpemma
Maybe an opportune time to point out that Kasperky are selling all home user products half-price until Xmas... ;)

I guess that's nice, But avast gives theirs away for Free. :D
Quote Ghys 17th November 2007, 06:42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Mc
I F*****G _HATE_ those adverts more than you can imagine, I find them more annoying than pop-ups.

there is an effective way to disable those very annoying adds ... I did it a couple months ago and now that I formated I am about to do it again. I'll edit this post once I got it working
Quote gillett 17th November 2007, 06:48
Firefox+adblock=good times
Quote Ghys 17th November 2007, 06:52
yep exactly i just had to remember what to block with it

turns out I blocked every script related to intellitxt and it worked perfectly :D (tested on joblo.com)
Quote Zut 17th November 2007, 16:48
Yeah adblock is the easiest way to avoid this! I don't block anything at bit-tech or some other favorite sites of mine, but I feel no guilt in blocking most of the crap on the web.
Quote woodshop 18th November 2007, 06:37
I want to know who's bright idea it was to get Flash this much access to the PC's that the browser running the flash is running on.. Am i wrong in thinking that makes flash just as bad a risk as Active X is/was?
Quote completemadness 18th November 2007, 12:27
I don think its quite as bad, but it certainly isn't great .....

I think a lot of the problem with ActiveX was the fact that IE is so integrated into the operating system, if you take control of IE you have a lot of control over the computer itself (A big problem with IIS servers too), i don't think flash is quite as bad as that
Quote Tulatin 18th November 2007, 12:59
Ah Doubleclick; First purveyor of tracker cookies, now pusher of malware ads (though unintentional). Isn't something like that material for a company killing class-action?
Quote evilgreenie 18th November 2007, 17:09
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Pope
We also don't use DoubleClick

Yeah but the method relied on injecting malware ads into the DoubleClick network through a dodgy third-party ad reseller/aggregator, and most ad networks use these somewhere along the line, so they are all potentially vulnerable.

I'm surprised the advertisers are not up in arms about this - a few more of these sort of scares and we'll all be Firefox+AdBlock+NoScript..
Quote completemadness 18th November 2007, 19:53
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilgreenie
Yeah but the method relied on injecting malware ads into the DoubleClick network through a dodgy third-party ad reseller/aggregator, and most ad networks use these somewhere along the line, so they are all potentially vulnerable.

I'm surprised the advertisers are not up in arms about this - a few more of these sort of scares and we'll all be Firefox+AdBlock+NoScript..
Most people (i believe) are still just on IE, and i bet alot arent even on IE7 ....

Its gonna take alot more then that to move people to FF+AB+NS
Quote macroman 19th November 2007, 12:28
Web users not using anti-virus? Surely not? :|

There is no excuse given that excellent anti-virus products are now available for free. Such as Avast.;)
Quote Bauul 19th November 2007, 15:01
Personally I use AVG, which uses a whopping 20 Kb of memory to continously run in the background. Far cry from Norton's many tens of megabytes. I'm amazed people in this day and age still don't have Virus Scanning software, with the years and years of press surrounding viruses people can't still be that ignorant, can they?
Quote E.E.L. Ambiense 19th November 2007, 16:46
You'd be amazed.
Quote crazybob 19th November 2007, 17:18
Quote:
Originally Posted by -EVRE-
I'm running AVG even tho its not the best... it eats ALOT of cpu horse power.
*Thats why I want a tri core! :b I dont care if its a failed quad core*
Erm, you might want to look into that. The reason I use AVG despite having a legal, non-expiring copy of McAfee through my university is that AVG doesn't slow my computer down. It's completely unintrusive and uses barely any system resources at all - I can't tell the difference in speed between AVG and no antivirus at all. So if you think AVG is using too much CPU, you need to either upgrade past 500 MHz or look at cleaning your system up to figure out why it's taking such a hit.

Back on topic, I see this as an excellent development. I block most ads, but I've heard that some sites are getting mad about that, and a few have even gone to the point of blocking Firefox users just in case. Now, though, I can claim that my ad blocker is just an additional layer of virus defense, rather than something to make my browsing more pleasant at the expense of people running pay-per-view ads (rather than pay-per-click, as I rarely click even when ads aren't blocked).
Quote Arkanrais 21st November 2007, 17:53
for f***'s sake, my comp has been dead for the pat 5 days because of this thing. I used BitDefender and registry mechanic to try find out why this message kept popping up every 30 seconds on my taskbar. BitDefender found a couple of things but they werent what I was after, but for some reason, the registry mechanic decided to delete some windows components or something and now my comp wont boot from my main HDD. Goddamn thing must have infected my pc when I went to download.com
Log in

You are not logged in, please login with your forum account below. If you don't already have an account please register to start contributing.



Palit HD4850 Series


Misco Ultimate Upgrades
Stats: 0.159 seconds