Oh gnoes! The internet killed the television star!
According to the results of a recent online survey conducted by IBM,
television sets are losing ground to the internet when it comes to personal leisure time. 19 percent of all respondents stated that they spent six hours or more per day on the internet versus nine percent of respondents spending the same amount of time in front of the television. 66 percent responded that they spent one to four hours in front of the television versus 60 percent on the internet.
"
Consumers are demonstrating their desire for both wired and wireless access to content: an average of 81 percent of consumers surveyed globally indicated they've watched or want to watch PC video, and an average of 42 percent indicated they've watched or want to watch mobile video," said Bill Battino, Communications Sector managing partner of IBM Global Business Services.
The survey constituted more then 2,400 households across the globe from mid-April through mid-June and covered the usage and adoption of new multimedia devices and media and entertainment consumption on PCs, mobile phones, portable media players and more.
For the television, it seems that DVRs and on demand services are the big drawing points for consumers. 24 percent of all US respondents reported owning a DVR with 33 percent saying they now watched more TV since purchasing a DVR then before owning one.
Social networking and online video sites are a couple of the ways that people are now spending their time online. 36 percent of Australians, 26 percent of Americans, 20 percent of UKers and 9 percent of Japanese respondents reported that they contributed to a social networking site. Seven percent of US respondents and nine percent of UK and Australian respondents reported that they contributed to user generated content sites. Of all of those who contributed, an average of 58 percent said they did so for recognition from peers and to feel part of the community rather then make money.
IBM has made the full results of the survey
available over on their site.
How many of you guys have ditched your TV in favour of watching your media on your computer? Tell us what parts of the survey you fall into in the comments section below or
over in the forums.
21 Comments
Discuss in the forums ReplyAnyways, TV is dead to me. I don't own one (though my family has several) and even if I did, it wouldn't be hooked up to actual broadcasting either via cable, satellite, or OTA transmissions. 95% of it is crap, and the other 5% is available on iTunes, Bit-torrent, the publisher's website, or some other source.
I have to wonder how accurate they are tbh, how big is the sample size ? and how random is the sample ?
What about those of use who have a TV (well HTPC) and computer so we can do both ?
If a show like Top Gear is on then I generally record it rather than download it since I get it higher quality and faster that way, plus it's legal.
Give us some options people.
They should be bring back The Big Breakfast... sigh... I used to wake up to watch that.. some times.
I can get all my content from the interpipes of the web now.
BBC news 24 is online, this is for the morning tea and breakfast before work.
Popular american tv shows that at the time of speaking arnt aired here, all through bittorrent.
Tried joost, its crap.
Tried 4od its also crap(kservice that is) but its still better than BBC's, download are quicker.
sopcast for certain sporting events.
I am really not one of these "OMG it has to be super high HD quality" I would be happy watching programs on a mobile phone. I have Friends seasons in a nice box set, but I dont watch them from the DVD anymore. I have them all digital at about 120 meg each episode. and its just better to click a random episode.
I guess youtube isnt too bad either, sometimes you can find some great documentaries on google video too. like 2 hours long if you wanted.
Sample size is slightly over 2,400 households spread out across the globe. It says it right in the article.
Anyway, if that's it, that is a really really poor sample, 2400 people for a global sample ? you have to be kidding
I'm amazed how many have PVRs. That figure makes me think that this test group wasn't as "broad" as they make it out to be.
1) Constant TV watching causes alot of downloading and then AOL jsut limit me to 256k from 8mb and then its imposible to watch TV as it does not stream.
2) The quality of the TV is so poor. VCD is better.
3) If you go buy Channel 4, then they charge you per program which sucks. Im not going to pay that as if I paif to watch then id get Sky.
5) How can I sit and watch TV and surf on my Laptop?? I dont like to watch TV in Small windows.
My TV stays