Tony Blair has openly critisized Sony for including Manchester Cathedral in Fall of Man for the PS3.
You may have heard about Sony's
problem with the Church of England, which we covered in more detail
earlier today as it seemed like things were a bit hopeless for the Church of England's legal battle.
The controversy has kicked off over the inclusion of Manchester Cathedral in the PS3 first person shooter,
Resistance: Fall of Man, which the Church objects to. The Church has reportedly asked for a large donation and a public apology from Sony, in addition to having the game pulled from the shelves - despite the fact it has been on sale across the world since late last year and has already shipped a million copies.
Yet only a few hours ago a new player entered the field and told everyone what his opinion was. Normally that wouldn't have been very interesting, but in this case it was UK Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
At a weekly question time a member of parliament from Manchester asked the Prime Minister about his thoughts on the matter, especially given the high level of gun crime in Manchester.
Blair commented that Sony needs to be more sensitive and responsible and that large companies, such as Sony, should pause to think about more than just making profits. (
handbags are drawn... - Ed.)
Sony has consistently refused to comment on the issue and has said only that they are liaising directly with the Church of England on the matter.
As usual, we'll be sure to keep you posted on the issue as it continues to evolve, but until then why not drop
in the forums and debate whether or not the government should punish Sony for this. Given that the Church doesn't have a legal leg to stand on though, that might be hard.
I've seen and played countless games with shootouts in churches and (omg) mosques. There should be no big deal over this.
Edit: hahahaha Jamie.
Blair is leaving office soon anyway - whatever legitimacy he had before his announcement went right down the pan as soon as he started um-ing and ah-ing over when he was going to leave. He's leaving, and as such it really doesn't matter if he pisses off one more group of people.
Oh, yeah - typo:
"...which the Church objects too." - should be single 'o'. ;) Second paragraph.
If they're that bothered, can't they release some sort of Firmware update to change the name of 'Manchester' in the game itself?
I haven't played the game, nor have I ever been on a PS3, so I'm not entirely sure how it all 'works'.
Would that be according to your own law degree, your lawyers law degree? or the gamesindustry.biz article you quoted earlier? If it is even they had the sense to use the wording "It is likely there is no basis for a claim"
Anyway so far its looking more like a win win for both sides, Sony's gotten lots of advertising for its game, church has gotten lots of advertising for its anti-gun campaign. And in a week or so it will all be forgotten.
I have yet to work out if it is the Church of England complaining or the local Bishop and cathedral authorities
Tony is really good at opening his mouth and inserting both feet. ;)
Perhaps hes just trying to make sure that his legacy wont be remembered just for breaking up the whole country (note. Scotland's Independence)
It's not like he made a public statement about it- it was merely a question picked during PMQs this week, and an opinion I personally support.
<A88>
Isn't this whole, "politically correct" stance going just a bit too far? Everyone getting so afraid of p1ssing off a group/culture/imaginary belief system..
If someone wrote a crime-thriller novel about some horrible serial killer who only "killed people in churches" and the author used real locations/landmarks as the backdrop -- would that get the same attention and spotlight? Would the PM feel the need to comment?
It's just a *video* game. It's *not* real... Why can't these weak minded people see that...?
(IMHO)
Hardly a scathing attack on Sony, more like the PM diplomatically answering a question at PMQ, he seems, to me, to have taken the middle road.
Edit: Just read <a88>'s reply, a point well made, which I'd like to echo.
It would help if some of you guys posting in the thread took the time to either watch PMQ or read the transcript to understand the statement in it's full context.
^what he said
Get in there Blair! ;)
Sam
All parties should just give it a rest, they're all making themselves look like idiots. Whats done is done, and getting a "large donation", or the game being pulled from the shelves isn't going to change the fact that it's been done, and that changing it, won't actually change it due to the masses of press coverage.
I don't really see how it's any more distasteful than a shootup anywhere else that has ever existed, will ever exist, or exists only in fantasy. And it's certainly less distasteful than a real shootup or bombing in a church. But then, I'm not overly religious, but if I were a Christian, I'd find a church no more a symbol of god that the house I'm sitting in or the tree in my garden.
Yea says the man, who lets a lot of our Arms Brokering laws be dictated by BAE systems and how they want to do business.
End of the day its just a bit of scenery. Its not as if terrorists are going to use resistance to map out the area and train to blast teh church like with MS flight simulator :P
If the church had anything to do with video games industry they would be like the ones Rod & Todd play in The Simpsons.....LOL
at the G8 summit he ordered everyone out the room so he could have a man to man chat with putin, he's trying to do heroic things that people will remember him by and im sorry tony but you'll always be a grade A idiot in my eyes.
this is no different. stand up for the church... get praise.... go out on a high.
So unlike them to ask for money :O