Activision has announced that Call of Duty 4 will have a modern setting and will be developed by creators Infinity Ward.
Activision has now confirmed the rumours that a new
Call of Duty game is in the works over at Infinity Ward.
The existence of a new
Call of Duty game isn't exactly surprising, but we're glad to see that it is Infinity Ward who'll be developing the title and not Treyarch who has been responsible for the series' less-good console titles.
What is surprising though is the suffix to the game's name;
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare isn't just a name and Activision is set to confirm that the action will take place in a modern setting rather than the World War II battlefields with which the game has become synonymous.
Rumours now suggest that the game will allow the player to serve with the US Army, US Marine Corps. and the British SAS in a battle against Middle Eastern terrorists.
Stereotype shattering stuff then.
Activision plans to unveil more concrete details, including platforms and gameplay tidbits, over the weekend in the US. A trailer is set to air during the NFL Draft on ESPN on Saturday, while international fans will probably be watching it on YouTube soon afterwards.
Looking forward to the series' new fictional setting, or wishing they'd tried World War I instead? Drop
by the forums and let us know your thoughts.
Love COD3 on the 360. Imo one of the best online multiplayer experiences. Nice to see they're leave WWII era as it's getting a little tired.
I'd be surprised if they would attract the majority of the regular Cod1/2 community to cod4 now that it's a totally different game
i guess all we can do is wait & see
COD's effects, visuals (non era related),sound and storyline more than anything made it such a success IMHO. When playing COD you were immersed in such a well scripted environment which stimulated the senses (no jokes please).
Moving on from the WWII era is just natural progression. Provided they maintain the same model, I cannot see how it could fail. We all discussed how it was our ability to relate to the WWII era which made the game such a hit, well Middle Eastern terrorism is even more relevant for OUR generation.
I dont think it will be like BF, since there is an unengaging feel about the BF series. Sure they are fun to play but I have never been gripped by the series the same as COD.
Just think of the goodies that DX10 will enhance
(Provided that there is the odd German to bash in the next game I'm sure we will all be very happy with the revamp......joking )
edit: or better.
AFIAK this is PC only. I read an article a ways back claiming it was, and saying that all odd numbered COD games will now be console while even will be PC only, but I don't know if thats changed or I'm even remembering it right. Anyway, I'm sure it'll be for the PC either way.
the sun doesn't shine!!!!!
was one of the big reasons I got my wii :)
I just hope this doesn't prove to be bad move. I personally would have loved to see a WWI game and think trench warfare would have been excellent.
The whole keeping your arm almost straight for an hour hurts.
About time a game of such is coded and released by some decent dev's.
I have been put off of playing BF2 due to all of EA's bugs and poor support.
(anyone recall first decade??! May god have mercy on EA's souls, as i certainly dont!)
I hate playing FPS on consoles. I hope they bring both to the PC market, I cant understand why they wouldnt do that.
Yeah same, after playing the first and second i became very bored. Maybe they will do something with the control system as well. I always found it to be very wooden and unresponsive!
I think a WWI era game would be good but it 13 levels of trench warfare would be repetitive. It would need to be more open otherwise it would become boring rather quickly.
So what I'm aiming here is that I don't think the skins and the theme do as much of a difference as does the overall gameplay. Even though I find it, at some level, being abuse for the Call of Duty-name, I still think it might be a good thing to move on to the modern times.
We shall see how this turns out. (sorry about the wall of text, I hope someone reads it through and finds something that makes sense.) (too much caffeine... must.. get.. more).
Ok, not really. But however, I am glad to see the CoD series moving away from WWII. I mean, it was probably one of the most important events in human history, but how many video games need to be made about it? I have a great respect for the people who fought in that war and died in that war, and every time some clone WWII shooter it sensationalizes the war and pushes the reality of the situation more into fantasy.
One of the things about the CoD series that was so great was that it was non-fictional. When playing the game you get a special respect for the situation because you know that the game that you are playing is recreating battles that actually happened. Its one of the few things that gave CoD its epic feeling. Now, in completely fictional settings, it's just gonna be another western-forces-destroy-generic-terrorists shooter. Now, with Infinity Ward creating it, I will give it the benefit of the doubt and hold judgment until the reviews come out.
Funny thing, I was digging through a closet looking for an old keyboard yesterday and I came across my grandfathers K-Bar. He was a "frogman" in the pacific theater during the war. Basically a frogman was the precursor to Navy Special Forces known as S.E.A.L.S. I've known we had this for a while, but it managed to pop up yesterday at a random time. Basically his main job during the war was recon/scout. He would swim out to islands and create maps and formulate intel in preparation for landings.
Anyway, getting to the point here, I was examining the knife and found several small notches etched in along the hand guard on the knife. I don't think I need to point out what those etches mean. But holding that object and knowing where it's been, what it was used for is...kind of surreal. Like...I can't even comprehend what it must have been like.
I don't know, I guess I'm just a WWII nerd.
Just by producing a WW1 title, with the reality of what it was like for soldiers in those battles, I think there's the scope for more than just a few adrenaline-filled moments.
On the other hand, maybe there's a balance to be struck? The over-all experience might be lost on something like the stalemate of the trenches, but do remember that there was much more to WW1 than just trench warfare.
Plenty of chances to go back in time for CoD5 though, I guess :D
Don't worry you're not the only one that would react that way...