Vista SP1 has been fast tracked for release in the second half of this year because of "high impact issues" with the OS.
The latest round of leaked emails from Microsoft has revealed that the software giant has put Windows Vista Service Pack 1 on fast track.
According to APC Magazine, the email puts a call out for
"customers and partners (to) actively test and provide feedback on Windows Vista SP1 to help us prepare for its release in the second half of CY07 (calendar year 2007)."
The leaked memo outlined the company's primary focus for the service pack:
"regressions from Windows Vista and Windows XP, security, deployment blockers and other high impact issues as are the primary focus for the Service Pack."
The final part of that statement may be enough to put many off upgrading to Vista before SP1 is released. Ouch.
Beta testers that reply to Microsoft's call out will be required to actively deploy and test Vista SP1 in production environments at each major milestone release. Testers will be required to provide extensive feedback to the software giant, as the company wants to ensure that SP1 is rock solid.
Will you be upgrading to Vista before SP1, or are you already running the OS? Let us know
in the forums.
No doubt Vista is "safer, faster, nicer, better", but seriously, why bother?
And yes, it's somewhat problematic, and I certainly haven't seen any killer reason for upgrading. It will be a while before some basic kinks are worked out, though a lot of that depends upon hardware and software producers.
But I'm loving it, and there is no way I could go back. After nearly 6 years of XP I'm finding the change really refreshing.
I like Vista and I'll be sticking without regardless of what happens with SP1.
*This either does or does not imply that I may or may not be possibly running a (il)ligitimate copy of a certain OS
The biggest issues have been driver related, but better drivers are arriving weekly.
Running x64 means that I can't use many common utilities because they don't have signed drivers; again, that will be sorted over time. E.g. I spoke to the author of speedfan, and he's saving up for the right kind of certificate to get the x64 version of speedfan working.
Then there is the issue of familiarity; some things are done differently, but it's largely intuitive.
I haven't got my head around UAC. It's very much a PITA at the moment.
Guess I'll have to see how it goes.