SiSoftware Sandra Lite XII.2008.SP1 (13.12) Website: Sisoftware
Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT, CnQ Enabled)
Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz)
8722.2
8306.8
8303.0
8293.8
8292.3
8139.2
8088.7
7594.5
7107.7
6975.3
6949.8
6900.3
6587.2
6531.2
6519.5
5534.2
5527.3
4261.3
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s
Athlon X2 6400+ (2x3.2GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
Athlon X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 1.0GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo E8500 (2x3.16GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E8400 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Phenom X4 9850 (4x2.5GHz, 2.0GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo E6850 (2x3.0GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Duo E8200 (2x2.66GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Phenom X4 9750 (4x2.4GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo E6550 (2x2.33GHz, 1,333MHz FSB)
Core 2 Quad Q6700 (4x2.67GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
Phenom X4 9550 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo Q6600 (4x2.40GHz, 1,066MHz FSB)
Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Core 2 Duo E4500 (2x2.20GHz, 800MHz FSB)
Phenom X4 9600 (4x2.3GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9500 (4x2.2GHz, 1.8GHz HTT)
Phenom X4 9350e (4x2.0GHz, 1.8GHz HTT, CnQ Enabled)
64
66
80
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
88
89
89
93
96
96
98
103
nanoseconds (lower is better)
Sisoft Sandra measures the performance on all cores unlike Everest's single core, and so the performance is appreciably better - even more than the efficient X2s. However the 9350e takes a large latency hit which is unusual to see on AMD CPUs, and the general memory performance here isn't exactly great due to its low clock speed. The other 65W CPU - the 9150e - will perform even worse because of its 1.8GHz core clock and 1.6GHz northbridge clock, compared to the 9350e's 2.0GHz and 1.8GHz respective frequencies.
1 - AMD Phenom X4 9350e
2 - Overclocking/Underclocking the Phenom X4 9350e
3 - Test Setup
4 - Lavalys Everest Memory Performance
5 - SiSoft Sandra Memory Performance
6 - Crysis
7 - World in Conflict
8 - PCMark Vantage x64
9 - Image Editing and File Compression
10 - DivX and x264 encoding
11 - Sony Vegas and Maxon Cinebench 10 x64
12 - Power Consumption
13 - HTPC Power Consumption
14 - Is an Energy Efficient quad-core worth it?
19 Comments